Summer 2017 Transfer Speculation

1333436383994

Comments

  • It will be a cracking bit of business if it comes off.
  • edited May 2017
    Really? I'm not completely convinced. Do we need any more 'for the future' forwards. ;hmm
  • says city have the right to buy him back after 2 years ,not sure I like the sound of that ,just a 2 year loan if that's true
  • 4 Pl goals this season.

  • MrsGrey said:

    Really? I'm not completely convinced. Do we need any more 'for the future' forwards. ;hmm

    Yep I agree. We should not be shelling £20m on anyone unless they are ready to play in the first team right away
  • In the unlikely event this came off, I'd be pretty sure that he would be considered as a starter.
  • Clicked on the site and got a note saying the transfer has been held up in some red tape, but if I could just give my bank details, that would clear it up and the announcement could be made tomorrow.


    So there will be no announcement tomorrow - sorry about that
  • I would love Iheanacho to sign. IMO he is ready now for the Prem.
  • I've got an idea that Nigerian site is the same one that announced that we were signing Musa...
  • Everton are not expected to take up the option to sign Enner Valencia permanently, having brought in the 27-year-old Ecuador winger on a season-long loan from West Ham in August. (Liverpool Echo)
  • Watford midfielder Dion Pereira, 18, is wanted by West Ham and Newcastle.(London Evening Standard)
  • Valencia did nt do enough at Everton to get a transfer reckon he will go to Spain or back to Mexico ;barrera
  • Valencia is on his way back according to the Liverpool Echo

  • I heard he saw Calleri play and decided he wanted to come back and fight for his place.

    What a battle that would be!
  • If Zabaleta is one of the three players to take us to the next level, does that mean the other 2 are going to be strikers, as most of ours can't stay fit long enough to make a valid contribution to the team moving upwards?
  • So I've been out all day and now find out that we haven't signed Iheanacho ;hmm

    Can't be right, surely
  • It's almost like the papers and bloggers make stuff up.

    Which is, obviously, just impossible.
  • West Ham are prepared to meet the £140,000-per-week wage demands of Everton's England midfielder Ross Barkley, 23. (Star)
  • edited May 2017
    Hart
    Zabaleta - Reid - Ogbonna - Cresswell
    Obiang - Kouyate
    Antonio - Barkley - Lanzini
    Iheanacho

    Amazing XI we're going to have ;lol
  • Being linked with Pickford in a Sun 'Exclusive'.

    £17m with Adrian going the other way.
  • MCH

    I would be reasonably confident we would not be prepared to do any such thing, and that we would not contemplate paying £50m for a player with one year left on their deal.
  • Sky are reporting that Lyon have offered 12 million Euros for Javier Hernandez, would he be a better option than Kelechi, especially if we might have to sell him back in 2 years?
  • Fortune

    He's certainly the more 'proven' of the two.

    I wouldn't pay too much attention to that 'buy back' thing - I don't think that website is particularly reliable or accurate.

    Think, overall, I'd prefer Iheanacho - but what about both?

    (Memo to self: find 'yeah right' smiley.)
  • http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/05/25/why-west-ham-should-avoid-a-move-for-juventus-mario-madzukic/

    Fails to mention the most compelling reason: he's just signed a new contract at Juve...
  • grey, We could certainly do with 2 decent "fit" strikers. You could put forward a case to sell all our current ones and start with a new set. ;ok
  • I'd rather keep ;ac

    I think if we had another main, fit first choice striker, it would ease the pressure on his old bones and muscles. There's no question that when fit he is still a very good player.
  • edited May 2017
    On balance, Grey, my preference would be to move AC on. I don't think he can fulfill the role of a back up because when needed there's every chance he'll be crocked. He just seems to get injured randomly and this isn't necessarily caused by a heavy workload. If Sakho also leaves, I would say we probably need two strikers
  • Iheanacho would be a great signing IMO as he scores all kinds of goals and has the perfect physique for the PL. Also, he's already done it here.

    Whether he's available or not I have no idea. I would have thought Man City would want to keep him.
  • grey, the problem with AC is on his day he can be unplayable but as baracks indicated his availability can only really be measured in days and not months.
This discussion has been closed.