I would take a chance on Jack Wilshere. I think we need a player who can play CM and break up the field and make something happen. He's available and would improve us. Obviously the fitness is a concern but I think he had quite a consistent season with Bournemouth and they ended up 9th.
Herb - it's not my pick. It's linked players plus Wilshere. ;ok
Andy Carroll, forgetting injuries, can be one of the most dangerous and threatening lone strikers in Europe. On his day he is unplayable. The only reason we are even in the market for a striker is because he is unreliable fitness wise.
So to replace him with Iheanacho, a guy with barely any minutes to his name, a few goals when being supplied by Silva, de Bruyne, Sterling, Toure, Aguero etc, and to say that guy is going to be our consistent lone striker in the PL and we will rely on him as our main man to get the goals for us to push into the top half...
If anyone thinks that S&G are going to sell Snodgrass for anything less than the £10.2m they paid for him four months ago then they've been living under a rock for the last seven years. They'll want at least what they paid for him but as he was grossly overpriced they won't get it.
Ditto with Valencia who they value at £11m, having cut his price from the original £14m they wanted from Everton.
With his injury history Sakho is currently about as marketable as Carroll, no one wants to risk spending money on either of them
I agree 20 m would be good but I do feel with sakho theres still hope if only we could get his head sorted out would like to give him another season injure free. of course if he does not want to be with us then try and get rid
Lukerz, good shout with Wilshere. I don't know if i am alone but i am a bit concerned at the lack of our English players (i know most clubs are in the same boat as well but it still grinds my gears)
Begovic signs for Bournemouth for £10m. Absolute snip.
Twist ;ok rumours suggesting Wilshere is available for £10m. I know many will question his fitness, but as long as he's our only 'injury risk' signing, I would take a gamble. He is the sort of calibre of player we would love to have, but obviously we can only dream of getting when there is ? over something. In this case his reliability, but no doubting his quality.
Would still love us to secure Defoe. Still hasn't officially signed for Bournemouth. Maybe there is still hope. Him and another forward would be perfect.
Carroll should be retained because he is a quality forward on his day, despite his injury record, yet Wilshere should not be signed due to his injury record, despite his quality on his day.
Works both ways.
Carroll will remain at West Ham until his contract expires.
Difference with Wilshere is he's just had a solid season. 27 league appearances for Bournemouth. Carroll hasn't. 18 league appearances.
It would be a slight risk, but if you could get a 25 year old for around £10m from Arsenal, would it not be worth considering, even though he seems to miss every other season?
I like a Begovic, but I don't think he's in a different class to our current GKs.
Leaving aside that Slav has said he's not interested n signing one, t would be too much of a like-for-like swap for me.
I want signings that are going to improve the 1st choice XI and push someone from that group down the pecking order. I don't believe Begovic does, nor Demarai Gray (sp?).
While I am ;hmm about AC, the one thing I know is - we didn't sign him knowing he would have so many injuries. With Wilshere, it would be precisely the opposite, and so it would be folly for a club in our situation to sign him, imo. We don't need to take that risk. Leave him for a newly-promoted club.
The lack of fanfare and celebration surrounding Adrian's contract extension IMO indicates we are going to try and get another keeper in and move him on in the process
Comments
Adrian/Randolph
Zabaleta/Byram - Reid/Collins - Ogbonna/Fonte - Cresswell/Masuaku
Noble/Obiang - Kouyate/Wilshere
Antonio/Feghouli - Lanzini/Ayew - Gray/Tadic
Iheanacho/Carroll
Andy Carroll, forgetting injuries, can be one of the most dangerous and threatening lone strikers in Europe. On his day he is unplayable. The only reason we are even in the market for a striker is because he is unreliable fitness wise.
So to replace him with Iheanacho, a guy with barely any minutes to his name, a few goals when being supplied by Silva, de Bruyne, Sterling, Toure, Aguero etc, and to say that guy is going to be our consistent lone striker in the PL and we will rely on him as our main man to get the goals for us to push into the top half...
Madness IMO and at £24m!
Then if possible try to move on, Snodgrass / Valencia / Sakho to recoup some money. Could be a good 20m on those 3.
Ditto with Valencia who they value at £11m, having cut his price from the original £14m they wanted from Everton.
With his injury history Sakho is currently about as marketable as Carroll, no one wants to risk spending money on either of them
and I reckon we can get 7m for Valencia and 5m for Sakho
So I reckon 20m is fair for those three.
He is too light for the prem...
SHOW ME THE MONEY!
Twist ;ok rumours suggesting Wilshere is available for £10m. I know many will question his fitness, but as long as he's our only 'injury risk' signing, I would take a gamble. He is the sort of calibre of player we would love to have, but obviously we can only dream of getting when there is ? over something. In this case his reliability, but no doubting his quality.
Would still love us to secure Defoe. Still hasn't officially signed for Bournemouth. Maybe there is still hope. Him and another forward would be perfect.
Carroll needs to go because he's injury prone, but we should get Wilshere? Really?
Since the 9/10 season, Wilshere has missed 145 games and been injured for 945 days.
Since the 8/9 season, Carrol has missed 137 games and been injured for 1056 days.
Wilshere:
Carrol
Carroll should be retained because he is a quality forward on his day, despite his injury record, yet Wilshere should not be signed due to his injury record, despite his quality on his day.
Works both ways.
Carroll will remain at West Ham until his contract expires.
Difference with Wilshere is he's just had a solid season. 27 league appearances for Bournemouth. Carroll hasn't. 18 league appearances.
It would be a slight risk, but if you could get a 25 year old for around £10m from Arsenal, would it not be worth considering, even though he seems to miss every other season?
Leaving aside that Slav has said he's not interested n signing one, t would be too much of a like-for-like swap for me.
I want signings that are going to improve the 1st choice XI and push someone from that group down the pecking order. I don't believe Begovic does, nor Demarai Gray (sp?).
While I am ;hmm about AC, the one thing I know is - we didn't sign him knowing he would have so many injuries. With Wilshere, it would be precisely the opposite, and so it would be folly for a club in our situation to sign him, imo. We don't need to take that risk. Leave him for a newly-promoted club.
Begovic is a great signing by Bournemouth. Shocked Everton didn't come in for him, their keepers are terrible.
When we signed ;ac there was no history of repeated injuries.
Wilshere has a history of injuries, and a long-standing issue with his ankle.
We've got Andy on the books, and I doubt we could get shot of him for much, so yeah, I say keep him and sign another starting CF.
I also say don't siign a known injury-prone player in a position where we are not desperate for players.
I don't see that as a contradiction.
Twist I do agree about the lack of English / British playerS, though