Summer 2017 Transfer Speculation
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
- 1.8K All Categories
- 1 Site Stuff
- 31 Admin (FAQs, rules, queries etc.)
- The Boleyn Arms
- 49 General Chatter
- 8 Member info & Family Album
- 3 Radio Llama (music videos)
- 540 Fun & Games
- 167 BA Predictor Threads
- 49 Word Games
- 4 Quizzes
- 2 Pun Threads
- 352 Magic Minutes
- 3 Other Fun & Games
- 140 Current West Ham
- 213 Men's First Team
- 4 Women's Team
- 13 PL2 & Academy
- 34 Management & Board
- 16 Stadium & Training Ground
- 32 West Ham Miscellaneous
- West Ham Matches
- 460 Match Threads
- 129 MOTM
- 12 West Ham Nostalgia
- 37 Former Players and Staff
- 5 Past Games & Glories
- 43 Transfers
- 51 Transfer Speculation
- 88 Completed Transfers
- 57 Internationals
- 50 Men's Internationals
- 5 Women's Internationals
- 2 Youth Internationals
- 136 Football Chatter
- 43 Football Chatter
- 284 Other Teams & Matches
- 27 Other Players & Staff
Comments
Cripes......
revealed/wildly-guessed-at/Fixed it for Hugh ;ok
Ok, so Bats is almost certainly out of the equation then.
25m for West Hams best player in the Jan window
Granted a lot of different factors on why Payet was sold at a lower price. But its pretty damn bad reading lol.
But not until we've got our striker situation sorted.
Is he starter? Do we fit in him in with MN and CK or is it 1 from the 3 to be on the bench.
I've thought on occasions it would be good to give CK a bit of a free role, let him terrorise whoever he sees fit during a game because his got the best engine.
MN PO
CK
RW ST LW
Something like that.
Plus Lukaku has been among the top Premier League strikers for the last five seasons, Payet was only here for a season and a bit.
and perhaps a new goalkeeper.
Another one off the list
Can't see it myself.
Which means C&H is just stirring the proverbial to turn people against the manager ;hmm
So much negativity around the club and we're nowhere near our heavy defeat to Man U yet.
It could be interpreted as Bilic was OK with it in principle... but not the final deal? Maybe once Sully negotiated the agreement acceptable to the player and City, he put it to the manager for a final approval and Bilic said no, not on those terms? Perhaps because the amount City want would mean there was less left in our budget to buy the quality of striker Bilic wanted (ie 'proven') so wasn't willing to give the ;ok to the Iheanacho deal. He didn't want to rely on that player as our 'main' new striker buy?
31st August = Diego Costs (loan to Jan 18) = party time
#ITK
But they'd better be confident of securing some of their other targets because we can only imagine the fall out if we have a repeat of last summer.
1. Twit puts unsubstantiated information out.
2. Said player signs for another club or Twit puts out a second unsubstantiated story saying club are no longer interested.
3. Morons abuse the club/owners/manager for not signing player.
And then repeat.
As normal me... ;wahoo ;angry ;weep
I find it difficult to believe that Bilic would veto Iheanacho
But then again, I find it difficult to believe that
VetoVito Corleone would be able to spell Iheanacho.So where are we again?
I want Iheanacho!!
I want a sexy manager too!!
#Bats too painful to type about ;weep
Following on from last Jan, where Bilic was 'happy with his squad and it was his call to go with the forwards we had'.
I for one, am happy that we are keeping fairly quiet as I see little upside in constantly talking to the press about intentions and wishes.
Come the end of the window, if in fact we have not added meaningfully to the squad and let a number of players leave, then the lack of action will certainly lead to a plethora of words, and rightly so
until then however........... I am going to stick to my original assertion that Giroud would be a great signing, so there ;wink