also ejected in east stand ,corner with STB stand,punch ups in that area and my stand the STB upper,apparently a five year old was given a load of expletives after moaning that they couldn`t see followed by the dad taking his own retribution To be honest i couldn`t concentrate fully on the match due to the incidents in the seats,when their fourth went in upped and left.........today left a rather bad taste in my mouth,hope it improves.
It looks to me like the stewards are targeting areas where some stand and some sit, leaving alone those areas (BML TBL ChavCorner) where everyone stands.
Suz,totally agree about targeting areas.Also on the way out fans were surrounding police and almost begging them to get in there and sort it out,they called the stewards heavy handed muppets.A policewoman replied that they can monitor outside but the stadium owners haven`t requested the match day presence of the old bill inside,presumably due to the fact that it`s not taxpayer funded,jesus,just wait till the spuds and chelsea get here.
Well I won't be taking my boy in fact I doubt I will attend any games until this is sorted out. That's assuming it can be. Starting to regret getting my membership.
I`m actually starting to regret this move,i was so in favour of it,but so far the negatives far out way the positives, watching the decline in my sons enthusiasm from the Juve Friendly to today a case in point
If this carries on I'm not going anymore I couldn't make it today but I'm not going to a game where you spend more time looking at fights breaking out and our fans at each other's throats no thanks such a shame this is happening but if I don't feel safe no way am I going to that stadium.
We are currently undertaking an immediate full review with all stakeholders. This includes police, stadium landlord and operator LS185, who are responsible for appointing and managing stewards and security, to ensure we eradicate such incidents moving forward.
Our policy ...remains one of zero tolerance and we will work with the police and other stakeholders to identify the individuals involved. ... they will be banned from attending any West Ham United fixture for life
Reports that some WHU fans were allowed to exit through the Watford areas as well.
I can only think that the lack of policing around / inside is down in part to cost for the stadium operators, they seem to think they can get away with the cheaper steward option. There will be carnage if they don't sort this out before a big game.
The stewards are trying to do a job that they're not set up to do properly. Not taking the majority of ex UP WHU stewards appears to be a big mistake and assigning the ones that did go to the wrong areas is another problem.
Hopefully the club get it sorted but Brady better not utter another word on this being the best migration to a world class stadium, it looks like and absolute shambles TBH
Regarding the banning of fans, I don't know if it's true or not, but someone appears to think they have some information.
Turns out it was well over 30 fans who've been banned for up to 2 years, for various "offences" including Foul and Abusive language as well as Racial language. Again I don't know for sure, but it could be that was a result of conflicts with the stewards when they were being asked/told to sit down and then subsequently ejected.
There could be more on the way and letters were going out from the club.
Statement from the club: We can report that following the match against AFC Bournemouth, the Club revoked the Season Tickets of a number of individuals who not only engaged in persistent standing throughout the match but were also abusive to West Ham supporters who were asking them to sit down. The offenders have been banned from the Stadium for the rest of the season.
it also looks like fans are standing in areas where they didn't used to ;hmm
Would be interesting to know where they were located at UP, my money is an old "accepted" standing area
I sit in the west upper over looking the retractable seating of the BML, fans stand now, fans stood at UP. As far as I can tell from mates in there no attempt has been made to get them to sit down. This is the same in the retractable seating of the TBL / away end.
Chav corner stood at UP, what I think is the the equivalent in the OS also seams to be a standing area. Some attempts have been made to get them to sit but not yesterday as far as I could tell. There is a clear line though where the standing stops and the sitting starts and in the main seams to have sorted itself out.
The one area I am not sure of is directly in front of me which is the bottom corner of the east stand, at UP this would have been the end of the chicken run where it met the BML. They sat down at UP park but it was one of the areas yesterday where fans were removed as some stood whilst other sat.
Poor journalism this morning on Sunday Supplement. Ollie Holt stating that it's a shame when teams move to new stadiums and can't fill them. He said the covers on the seats were to hide the empty seats.
There has been so much in the press about the fact there are 66,000 seats in the OS and we want to get permission to fill it but whilst there is standing and fighting we will not get permission for higher attendances. It gets to me that people still want to see that we will never fill it.
I've long since given up being cross or suprised by what Holt has to say. He's mates with Neil Warnock and spent a lot of his time peddling miss-information about the Tevez affair.
Suz - couldn't agree more - I'm also one of the 'silent majority' of 45,000 or so that are not silent, do sing and shout and enjoy our selves. Contrary to suggestion from some, we are actually Hammers (not closet Chav's or Gooners) and are now able to sit with our friends, kids and grandkids and we are the future of West Ham, the club we love and support. ;ok
Grey - sadly it would seem that in football 'journalism and punditry' the aim is no longer to inform but to twist and manipulate the truth to support whatever agenda they, or their paymasters, wish to pursue.
Lot of the trouble seems to be near away fans. A few more stewards, a larger gap between home and away and that will go a long way to solving. After surrendering a 2-0 lead fans never going to take being baited at 2-3 very well, not that it's an excuse. Also need a family area and a real look at a safe standing area.
I go and I love it. I miss the old place but there are so many positives.
A sensible and simple solution to the away fan problem is to only allow that section behind the goal to away fans. If there are empty seats, so be it. They can open up some more at the top and keep the 54,000.
Just had this message from a mate who was there yesterday....".there were 3 fellas in lower tier yesterday right in front of us, wouldn't sit down, just 3 in whole section, had their backs to the game the whole time, singing to & taunting the stewards.....they let em get away with it til just before half time, then they went in & kicked em out, but somehow the stewards were the bad guys, the whole of the Bobby lower were screaming and abusing them. Why were they even there? it certainly wasn't to see the game"
The away fans are already complaining that they only get 2800 of the stipulated 3000 tickets as the design is such that segregation is not straight forward. If they make a larger gap there will be either ST holders shifted out or a further reduction in the away allocation which would probably be refused by the Premier League.
For every policeman in attendance within the stadium there is a cost which our landlords do not appear, at this stage, want to bear. What the club should do is take it to our landlord and tell them they are not fulfilling the lease in providing a safe and secure environment.
Of course all the idiots should be sitting, end of.
Comments
Stand up if you love West Ham started up but very few joined in and very few did.
So North East corner lower fans were ejected I'm assuming because of complaints? Yet BML, STBL and away fans were allowed to stand with no problems?
Is it just me or is it just as simple as a ticket swap system ?
It looks to me like the stewards are targeting areas where some stand and some sit, leaving alone those areas (BML TBL ChavCorner) where everyone stands.
They need to sort it.
Keep ejecting the disruptive fans, and give their season tickets to someone on the waiting list ;ok
Reports that some WHU fans were allowed to exit through the Watford areas as well.
I can only think that the lack of policing around / inside is down in part to cost for the stadium operators, they seem to think they can get away with the cheaper steward option. There will be carnage if they don't sort this out before a big game.
The stewards are trying to do a job that they're not set up to do properly. Not taking the majority of ex UP WHU stewards appears to be a big mistake and assigning the ones that did go to the wrong areas is another problem.
Hopefully the club get it sorted but Brady better not utter another word on this being the best migration to a world class stadium, it looks like and absolute shambles TBH
We can report that following the match against AFC Bournemouth, the Club revoked the Season Tickets of a number of individuals who not only engaged in persistent standing throughout the match but were also abusive to West Ham supporters who were asking them to sit down. The offenders have been banned from the Stadium for the rest of the season.
I sit in the west upper over looking the retractable seating of the BML, fans stand now, fans stood at UP. As far as I can tell from mates in there no attempt has been made to get them to sit down. This is the same in the retractable seating of the TBL / away end.
Chav corner stood at UP, what I think is the the equivalent in the OS also seams to be a standing area. Some attempts have been made to get them to sit but not yesterday as far as I could tell. There is a clear line though where the standing stops and the sitting starts and in the main seams to have sorted itself out.
The one area I am not sure of is directly in front of me which is the bottom corner of the east stand, at UP this would have been the end of the chicken run where it met the BML. They sat down at UP park but it was one of the areas yesterday where fans were removed as some stood whilst other sat.
There has been so much in the press about the fact there are 66,000 seats in the OS and we want to get permission to fill it but whilst there is standing and fighting we will not get permission for higher attendances. It gets to me that people still want to see that we will never fill it.
Please don't be put off going by a few morons.
My block (203 turnstile A) is full of fans all behaving well and having a fine old time. As are the blocks on either side.
A sensible and simple solution to the away fan problem is to only allow that section behind the goal to away fans. If there are empty seats, so be it. They can open up some more at the top and keep the 54,000.
(She sits in the section I mentioned earlier).
For every policeman in attendance within the stadium there is a cost which our landlords do not appear, at this stage, want to bear. What the club should do is take it to our landlord and tell them they are not fulfilling the lease in providing a safe and secure environment.
Of course all the idiots should be sitting, end of.