The UK is Out - New PM - and whither now for Article 50
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
- 1.5K All Categories
- 1 Site Stuff
- 31 Admin (FAQs, rules, queries etc.)
- The Boleyn Arms
- 35 General Chatter
- 7 Member info & Family Album
- 3 Radio Llama (music videos)
- 416 Fun & Games
- 111 BA Predictor Threads
- 34 Word Games
- 4 Quizzes
- 2 Pun Threads
- 300 Magic Minutes
- 3 Other Fun & Games
- 117 Current West Ham
- 200 Men's First Team
- 3 Women's Team
- 12 PL2 & Academy
- 32 Management & Board
- 15 Stadium & Training Ground
- 27 West Ham Miscellaneous
- West Ham Matches
- 403 Match Threads
- 72 MOTM
- 9 West Ham Nostalgia
- 35 Former Players and Staff
- 4 Past Games & Glories
- 37 Transfers
- 46 Transfer Speculation
- 87 Completed Transfers
- 55 Internationals
- 48 Men's Internationals
- 5 Women's Internationals
- 2 Youth Internationals
- 121 Football Chatter
- 43 Football Chatter
- 270 Other Teams & Matches
- 26 Other Players & Staff
Comments
Have you?
( ;sofa and waits for #statbomb )
Yep, sounds totally fair and equitable to me.
Well, no, not me, at least.
I said it should never have been put to the people.
If we are allowing qualified people to come here and fill in our shortfalls for jobs, perfect they will work hard pay tax and be entitled to what they should be.
If however they are unskilled have no job, don't speak the language have no money if there own etc etc
Why on earth should we have them here
That's democracy ;wink
--
I don't know what you are saying, but it actually wasn't what I said in my earlier post. ;ok
66% of those people who voted Conservative at the last election admitted that they did so on the promise of a EU referendum.
You stated I asked you what that was based on.
If they work + pay tax and would be 'entitled to all things' as a UK citizen would, why will they need to prove they have money to be self-sufficient?
And if, after a couple of years, they lose their job? They will be entitled to benefits, having paid taxes in the normal way, wouldn't you agree?
And, another flaw in your cunning plan - it is often the unskilled and dirty jobs where there is a shortfall.
Where did I say in my post that those statements were lies.?
We won't know for at least two years what will happen with trade so that is at least a half-truth.
I doubt if Cameron would have got a better deal on immigration as free movement is one of the EUs main priorities.
I have my strong beliefs as do you so I don't think we will come to any middle ground on this subject.
Mike
I have duel citizenship for Australia I had to transfer 20k to an Aussie bank account before I arrived.
Also had three medical a over the period of three years it took me to get it.
Had to have a job to go to and the employer letter proving it
Criminal record check
Amongst a whole host of other things
Is that a cunning plan
No it's not it's getting the right people in for the best interests of the country
#alf
Like the Aussie PM said yesterday
If anyone that has moved to Aussie does not respect there values and way of like your free to go we don't want you here
Quality
You accused Remainers of sour grapes and challenged them to point out where they said BEFORE the vote that they were anti the referendum process.
So some did.
You referred to lies and half lies. I conflated that with a post just before it where the question was asked what lies the 'Remain' side told.
https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2016/06/27/nick-barber-tom-hickman-and-jeff-king-pulling-the-article-50-trigger-parliaments-indispensable-role/