Ne old iron I know 3 people that wanted to stay in! And approx 70 wanted out Me and a lots mates done postal vote in pen Polls issued pencils ,,, for voting !!!!! Justsaying
;clap
Polling stations always have pencils, have done since I first voted in 1979. If they used pens they'd all be nicked by lunchtime...
“It was taking an American-style media approach. What Goddard Gunster [US political campaign strategy firm that Banks hired] said early on was ‘facts don’t work’ and that’s it. The remain campaign featured fact, fact, fact, fact, fact. It just doesn’t work. You have got to connect with people emotionally. It’s the Trump success.”
“The Conservatives are now trying to rewrite the campaign that immigration wasn’t important, but boy was immigration important. The first thing we did was poll everybody and we found that if immigration wasn’t the issue, the issue was schools or education, proxies for immigration. It was the number one issue by a country mile.”
Arron Banks. Funder of Leave.EU (the UKIP campaign)
Say he spent £11 million of his own money funding the campaign. Which was centred on immigration. And had no truck with truth.
Brave New World. ;doh
Whichever side of the fence you are on, doesn't that make you sad/angry/despairing (delete as appropriate)?
FTSE 100 finished today above pre brexit levels ;whistle The funniest quote I've seen is that the brexit has affected some peoples mental health Oh do me a favour
And the FTSE 250, which consists of companies more focused on the UK economy than those in the FTSE 100, has not recouped its post-Brexit losses. Despite a 3.2% rise on Wednesday it is still down 7.6% since the result of the vote.
If we really exit the EU but want to stay part of the single market, immigration (the main selling point for Leave) will not change but the economy will be far worse.
We will always have access to the single market, the question is whether there is a cost we have to pay. If we have to pay a cost, then the natural balance to that will be that the single market countries will have to pay a cost for access to the UK market ... just saying ;whistle
The key word in this quote is "speculators" - speculation the currency of the media and those who prefer to bet for a living, compared to those who work for a living, either in creating/manufacturing or in the service industry. Basically bets were placed, they (generally) lost and are trying to recover their positions through short term actions. Hopefully they will lose more and learn the error of their ways.
Everything would not be rosy whichever option was selected last week. The difference will be in whether we have control over our own affairs or leave it to either unelected eurocrats in Europe, or an elected European Government which may or may not reflect the common view of the British people. I am happy with my choice.
NE, I think being held to ransom by the markets, free loaders and speculators is more indicative of whats wrong with the World than blaming 17 million out voters. Perhaps we should pay less attention to the markets and more attention to real people with real views.
We will always have access to the single market, the question is whether there is a cost we have to pay. If we have to pay a cost, then the natural balance to that will be that the single market countries will have to pay a cost for access to the UK market ... just saying ;whistle
There most certainly will be a cost to pay, if we take Norway as an example of a country not in the EU but with full access to the single market then we'll end up paying exactly the same as we are now with the same free movement of labour but with no say in the decision making.
Everything would not be rosy whichever option was selected last week. The difference will be in whether we have control over our own affairs or leave it to either unelected eurocrats in Europe, or an elected European Government which may or may not reflect the common view of the British people. I am happy with my choice.
For 'unelected eurocrats in Europe' read the Civil Service and for 'or an elected European Government which may or may not reflect the common view of the British people' read the current UK government.
I had promised myself not to get involved anymore. But one other thing that really grates is a huge finger is being pointed at a small number of boneheads pushing there racist bile. Whilst the same set of people pointing this finger think nothing of shouting, screeching and verbally abusing Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage, abuse is abuse is abuse. Sorry, just one other thing; If you want to gauge the lack of respect politicians have for the voting public, just watch five minutes of these morons in The House of Commons after David Cameron spoke for the first time after Brexit the other day, the contempt, mockery and ridicule for the decision from both sides of The House was truly shocking. These people tell us how to behave, what`s right and acceptable behaviour? I honestly think that if the politicians do choose to ignore the referendum result then we are storing up a heap of trouble that will make a little market volatility look pretty insignificant.
Madcap - we live in a global economy, especially the UK where the banking and financial sector account for a huge chunk of our economy. If the 2008 crash taught us anything it is that nations have little control over the markets and as a country with an economy heavily dependent on financial services we are going to suffer when the market is volatile.
If we don't want the UK economy to be so susceptible to market fluctuations then we need greater regulation of the financial sector (like Germany for example) but that is certainly not what those leading the Brexit campaign (UKIP, the Johnson/Gove wing of the Tories) want, if anything they want less regulation
MadCap, while I think everyone agrees that plenty of people who voted out aren't racist, it irritates me that people also try to downplay it. Maybe people you spoke to didn't vote for that reason but there are plenty of others who clearly say they did. The media coverage has long been heavily linked to fear about immigration, it was a heavy theme in the campaign (and even the general election with the Labour mug) and what is happening now in terms of racist/xenophobic abuse shows who has been emboldened.
I also have tried not to get too involved because I don't think there's much use trying to blame people who voted a certain way or to predict whether the economy will/won't collapse instead of discussing what exit route will suit the whole country.
But it grates me when people try to minimise the role of racism in this thing, including the Labourites who think this is all about their little Westminster world. Everyone's little discussions about what will or won't happen to the economy, single market etc. are all theoretical. In reality, racism has increased.
What about the 16 million Remain voters? Are they not real people with real views?
That's not what he said according to the way I read his post ;ok
Exactly, not my point at all, my point is shouldn`t we be listening to people rather than peering over our shoulders at markets. That point would stand whoever had won. If the result was reversed then we would be staying in The EU, but surely 16 million indicating that they would like to leave would perhaps ring alarm bells with the politicians that despite buoyant markets and the Remainers celebrating with bunting and street parties, not all was rosy amongst the general populus. The vote was extremely close which is why in the spirit of conciliation and cooperation the next government should be a coalition. IMO. However, given that the outers won (by a small margin admittedly) the focus of the government should be securing the best future for Britain, but with Brexit as its primary goal.
ASLEF, couldn`t agree more regarding the financial sector and the global economy. Britain is over reliant on this sector to its detriment. If a World economy can be held to ransom on the whims and fancies of a few super rich gamblers then there is something fundamentally wrong. Perhaps we should take this opportunity, in the long term, to start making things again. We wouldn`t then need to hold our breath if Mr Super Rich Gambler gets out of the bed the wrong side. Naive and idealistic possibly, but something needs to change.
Outcast, I agree with everything you say. The actions of these boneheads should be condemned in the strongest terms by both sides, particularly Nigel Farage. Believe me, I wouldn`t normally ally myself with the likes of Farage, Johnson, Gove etc etc. and I think both Remainers and Outers are split across the normal political divides. And believe me I wasn`t trying to downplay the seriousness of it, it`s just that to some Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage appear to be fair game.
MadCap, the problem is that in he global economy, others elsewhere in the world can make things much more cheaply than we can ...
So why do we make anything at all. Defeatist attitude IMO. And talking directly to manufacturers/importers the impression I get is that the cost gap is shrinking. Hence the reason I said "in the long term".
Comments
“The Conservatives are now trying to rewrite the campaign that immigration wasn’t important, but boy was immigration important. The first thing we did was poll everybody and we found that if immigration wasn’t the issue, the issue was schools or education, proxies for immigration. It was the number one issue by a country mile.”
Arron Banks.
Funder of Leave.EU (the UKIP campaign)
Say he spent £11 million of his own money funding the campaign.
Which was centred on immigration. And had no truck with truth.
Brave New World.
;doh
Whichever side of the fence you are on, doesn't that make you sad/angry/despairing (delete as appropriate)?
They are direct quotes from here http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/leave-donor-plans-new-party-to-replace-ukip-without-farage
The funniest quote I've seen is that the brexit has affected some peoples mental health
Oh do me a favour
Hopefully I'll have enough to finish the WALL before Donald gets in
;wahoo
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/28/global-markets-rally-a-dead-cat-bounce.html
If we really exit the EU but want to stay part of the single market, immigration (the main selling point for Leave) will not change but the economy will be far worse.
Just saying
;whistle
(Not that I fully understand all that WTO stuff.)
Everything would not be rosy whichever option was selected last week. The difference will be in whether we have control over our own affairs or leave it to either unelected eurocrats in Europe, or an elected European Government which may or may not reflect the common view of the British people. I am happy with my choice.
So nothing changes really does it?
What about the 16 million Remain voters? Are they not real people with real views?
If we don't want the UK economy to be so susceptible to market fluctuations then we need greater regulation of the financial sector (like Germany for example) but that is certainly not what those leading the Brexit campaign (UKIP, the Johnson/Gove wing of the Tories) want, if anything they want less regulation
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/everything-will-be-on-the-table-in-brexit-talks-says-french-minister
Scary reading:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/28/uk-lacks-expertise-for-trade-talks-with-europe-says-top-civil-servant
I also have tried not to get too involved because I don't think there's much use trying to blame people who voted a certain way or to predict whether the economy will/won't collapse instead of discussing what exit route will suit the whole country.
But it grates me when people try to minimise the role of racism in this thing, including the Labourites who think this is all about their little Westminster world. Everyone's little discussions about what will or won't happen to the economy, single market etc. are all theoretical. In reality, racism has increased.
Ignorance helps the argument I suppose.