On Paqueta, it was 8 days ago that he responded to a tweet that suggested he wanted to leave with "Fake News". Obviously I can believe that he would be interesting in joining Man City, but he doesn't seem to be agitating for a move, IMO.
So it's looking like another transitional season then. Rice, Scamacca, Lanzini, Paqueta and Cresswell all gone or looking likely to leave. At least five new faces coming in to replace them.
Maguire has a point to prove I guess, let’s hope he can do what Lingard managed to in his loan spell, prove the doubters wrong… So if he is to be our captain and if we play a back 4 , who’s his regular partner barring injuries, Zouma or Aguerd?…
This is on SSN re Paqueta, if true doesn’t bode well …… “However, it's understood Paqueta's head has been turned by the interest of the treble winners.”
I'll be gutted if we sell Paqueta. He took a while to settle in but really started to shine towards the ends of the season and boss games. He's one of the few players in the team capable of magic and exciting to watch.
It's not true that he doesn't suit the team. He's strong and a good tackler. He can do most things well and he's finally up to speed.
City just do not need him and we do not need to sell him.
I'll be gutted if we sell Paqueta. He took a while to settle in but really started to shine towards the ends of the season and boss games. He's one of the few players in the team capable of magic and exciting to watch.
It's not true that he doesn't suit the team. He's strong and a good tackler. He can do most things well and he's finally up to speed.
City just do not need him and we do not need to sell him.
Potentially KDBs long-term replacement. KDB shares similar physical qualities and is happy to do the dirty work, like Paqueta has for us. If Pep wants to rest him, he doesn't have a natural replacement in the squad, so I can see Paqueta getting plenty of minutes and being 7 years younger, could be viewed as KDBs eventual successor.
Thing with City is they can let the smaller clubs like us take the risk on these types of players, knowing that they can pick them off 12 months late if they prove themselves capable in the PL.
The reality is we're a stepping-stone club and always will be unless we get some oil money.
Sounds like JWP is on his way... i think id take Fofana over Gallagher if thats the case.
Do you think we'd buy a third midfielder though? Alvarez, JWP and another? With Soucek still around.
It does feel like we need a ball carrying midfielder but don't know where the space is for that.
We definitely need a third, IMO. Alvarez sitting, JWP knocking the ball around like prime Noble and an energetic ball carrier to get the ball forward on the ground.
McTominay, Fofana and Gallagher are probably best suited to that role. Soucek benched, IMO.
We then need some more pace upfront, either through the middle or wide left.
I'll be gutted if we sell Paqueta. He took a while to settle in but really started to shine towards the ends of the season and boss games. He's one of the few players in the team capable of magic and exciting to watch.
It's not true that he doesn't suit the team. He's strong and a good tackler. He can do most things well and he's finally up to speed.
City just do not need him and we do not need to sell him.
Potentially KDBs long-term replacement. KDB shares similar physical qualities and is happy to do the dirty work, like Paqueta has for us. If Pep wants to rest him, he doesn't have a natural replacement in the squad, so I can see Paqueta getting plenty of minutes and being 7 years younger, could be viewed as KDBs eventual successor.
Thing with City is they can let the smaller clubs like us take the risk on these types of players, knowing that they can pick them off 12 months late if they prove themselves capable in the PL.
The reality is we're a stepping-stone club and always will be unless we get some oil money.
Sounds like JWP is on his way... i think id take Fofana over Gallagher if thats the case.
Do you think we'd buy a third midfielder though? Alvarez, JWP and another? With Soucek still around.
It does feel like we need a ball carrying midfielder but don't know where the space is for that.
I dont think we can afford not to. We need a ball carrying midfielder and legs in the middle... especially as counter attacking football is our style. Its no good playing counter attacking football, if we dont have anyone carrying the ball forward. I also agree with OCS that we need more pace upfront. I dont think we're quick enough going forward.
I’m going to stick my neck out and say Paqueta won’t leave. City baulked at our Rice asking price, they won’t pay over the odds for players. I think if we stick to our guns they won’t pay the money, and then he can leave next summer if there’s a release clause.
I'll be gutted if we sell Paqueta. He took a while to settle in but really started to shine towards the ends of the season and boss games. He's one of the few players in the team capable of magic and exciting to watch.
It's not true that he doesn't suit the team. He's strong and a good tackler. He can do most things well and he's finally up to speed.
City just do not need him and we do not need to sell him.
Potentially KDBs long-term replacement. KDB shares similar physical qualities and is happy to do the dirty work, like Paqueta has for us. If Pep wants to rest him, he doesn't have a natural replacement in the squad, so I can see Paqueta getting plenty of minutes and being 7 years younger, could be viewed as KDBs eventual successor.
Thing with City is they can let the smaller clubs like us take the risk on these types of players, knowing that they can pick them off 12 months late if they prove themselves capable in the PL.
The reality is we're a stepping-stone club and always will be unless we get some oil money.
Comments
https://www.hammers.news/club-news/fake-news-west-ham-star-lucas-paqueta-responds-directly-to-journalists-accusation/
Not ideal, but nothing ever is at West Ham.
We'll always have Prague.
So if he is to be our captain and if we play a back 4 , who’s his regular partner barring injuries, Zouma or Aguerd?…
This is on SSN re Paqueta, if true doesn’t bode well ……
“However, it's understood Paqueta's head has been turned by the interest of the treble winners.”
Bowen JWP Gallagher
Would not be surprised to see this if Paqueta goes.
I admit to being jealous though.
It's not true that he doesn't suit the team. He's strong and a good tackler. He can do most things well and he's finally up to speed.
City just do not need him and we do not need to sell him.
It does feel like we need a ball carrying midfielder but don't know where the space is for that.
Thing with City is they can let the smaller clubs like us take the risk on these types of players, knowing that they can pick them off 12 months late if they prove themselves capable in the PL.
The reality is we're a stepping-stone club and always will be unless we get some oil money.
McTominay, Fofana and Gallagher are probably best suited to that role. Soucek benched, IMO.
We then need some more pace upfront, either through the middle or wide left.
And a left back.
A lot to do in 22 days...