as a loan deal it makes sense, but for 1.5m plus his wages equating to around 3m for potentially 17 games he can play seems pretty poor value. Especially with no option to purchase. All seems a Win Win for Man U who can chuck us a player to try and reform then make a decent sale later potentially and for us his opportunities might be limited due to the players he would need to push out the team to get in.
as a loan deal it makes sense, but for 1.5m plus his wages equating to around 3m for potentially 17 games he can play seems pretty poor value. Especially with no option to purchase. All seems a Win Win for Man U who can chuck us a player to try and reform then make a decent sale later potentially and for us his opportunities might be limited due to the players he would need to push out the team to get in.
I did some maths earlier, and if all the reports I’ve seen are true then we have spent more for the next five months on Benrahma than on Lingard
He’s now in his prime, he was due to be a free agent in the summer but they extended his deal by 12 months. Presumably to get a fee for him.
There is no way they will be handing him a new long term contract based on his recent playing time &, if they do, he would be stupid to accept it based on his recent lack of appearances. It all points to him being sold in the summer, unless he does something pretty special here. This is not a 21 year old. United offering a 28/29 year old who does not play a new contract is not going to happen.
Look at this as a trial period for us. If he impresses us, we may sign him permanently in the summer.
as a loan deal it makes sense, but for 1.5m plus his wages equating to around 3m for potentially 17 games he can play seems pretty poor value. Especially with no option to purchase. All seems a Win Win for Man U who can chuck us a player to try and reform then make a decent sale later potentially and for us his opportunities might be limited due to the players he would need to push out the team to get in.
I did some maths earlier, and if all the reports I’ve seen are true then we have spent more for the next five months on Benrahma than on Lingard
Probably, but the difference is we get to keep Benrahma! At the end of the season we get nothing more from Lingard.
"It's important that a player and manager have a good relationship. He's got really good morals, he gets his team working hard and I've had a chat with him already and there are no guarantees - it's down to me to put the work in and put the graft in, to get into the team and play well week-in, week-out."
Moyes said: "I've seen him play as a young boy, when he was still a wide player on the right, and I've seen him play off the left. He's played for England as a number 10, he's played for England as a number eight, and I actually think if we needed him as a false nine, he could do that as well.
This signing also frees up Bowen (one of the most regularly subbed players) to play up top too, if we need cover for Antonio or Antonio needs to come off. Saves us using Yarmolenko who is a different sort of player. Bowen can go up top, Lingard to the right. Not ideal, but probably in Moyes thinking.
Not sure where this leaves Lanzini. I'd imagine he's behind Lingard and Benrahma in the No10 role, behind Lingard and Benrahma on the left wing and behind Lingard and Fornals as back-up CM.
Or, if he does well, enjoys being London based, gets on well with his new team mates he could say I like it here can we make this permanent. If Man U are busy looking at other targets in the summer it may suit them to let him go.
Well me personally can’t see him getting much game time I’m happy with the first 11 so can only see sub role for him at best he’s not played a lot of football so also needs to get match fit, and OGS says he as a future at Man Utd so if we do sign him it be to an over inflated figure
He will get game time. The only certainties in that side are Ogbonna, Coufal, Cresswell, SouDec, Antonio & Bowen. Fornals & Benrahma will be rotated & there is a risk Antonio will not make it until May with no further injuries. He will get a chance & it is down to him to take it.
Comments
Still not convinced by the finances / no option to buy contract.
He’s now in his prime, he was due to be a free agent in the summer but they extended his deal by 12 months. Presumably to get a fee for him.
There is no way they will be handing him a new long term contract based on his recent playing time &, if they do, he would be stupid to accept it based on his recent lack of appearances. It all points to him being sold in the summer, unless he does something pretty special here. This is not a 21 year old. United offering a 28/29 year old who does not play a new contract is not going to happen.
Look at this as a trial period for us. If he impresses us, we may sign him permanently in the summer.
Hope this works.
"It's important that a player and manager have a good relationship. He's got really good morals, he gets his team working hard and I've had a chat with him already and there are no guarantees - it's down to me to put the work in and put the graft in, to get into the team and play well week-in, week-out."
Moyes said: "I've seen him play as a young boy, when he was still a wide player on the right, and I've seen him play off the left. He's played for England as a number 10, he's played for England as a number eight, and I actually think if we needed him as a false nine, he could do that as well.
False 9
I’m in
Out the door in the summer?
Not to mention the threat of COVID.