If it's Allen and Sander Berge, for example, then I'm ok with him coming in. In our situation, it wouldn't be a bad thing to have an experienced Wilshere/Noble alternative in the pool of midfield options, but we need some more strength and steel in the middle of the park.
Hamstew, I agree that 40pts is usually about the cut off point that determines survival or relegation, but not always, and if we carry on playing like we are at the moment, we will be dragged into a relegation fight for survival.
Sander Berge is the type of signing that could really be a coup and a hidden gem, or it could be a player from a minor league (all due respect) that doesnt make the step up
Personally I'd be all for it, fits the mould of progressive signings mid table clubs need to make but I'd be well surprised if his value isnt closer to £20mil than the £10m we apparently bid
Think it's more of a summer move for us to go for, although more parties will be interested I'm sure
I don’t think we will be paying an 8 figure sum for any player in this window In spite of all the wild rumours flying around everywhere
I wondered about this, so I took a look into it.
Since January 2010, we have signed 29 players in the winter transfer window. This is at an average of of £1.6m per head. Our top five most expensive January signings last decade were:
£10.8m - Robert Snodgrass - 2017 £9.18m - Jordan Hugill - 2018 £8.28m - Jose Fonte - 2017 £4.32m - Sam Byram - 2015 £2.61m - Gary O'Neil - 2011
Only a further 4 signings cost more than £1m.
In the past four winter windows we have made more money than we have spent.
2018/19 - £450k profit 2017/18 - £24.27m profit 2016/17 - £7.29m profit 2015/16 - £730k profit 2014/15 - £1.71m loss 2013/14 - £630k loss 2012/13 - £270k loss 2011/12 - £3.04m loss 2010/11 - £2.99m loss 2009/10 - £2.34m loss
My interpretation of all of this is that the club invest in the summer, and don't tend to keep a pot back for a rainy day (January). Even when we have recouped money - 2017/18 and 2016/17 - we haven't invested it.
2017/18 is particularly interested as it was Moyes' window with us. Ayew, Sakho & Fonte went out for a combined £34.53m. We brought in Hugill for £9.18m, Evra on a free, and spent £1.08m on Joao Mario's loan.
This window, the daves are only likely to address the burning platforms. Arguably the only things which might fall into that category are Roberto and the threat of relegation. IMO the the daves will already be happy that the latter will not happen. So it is only the Roberto situation they will definitely resolve I think. They might not even bother looking for a r/b if they think Johnson is close to a return and can deputise there. In theory even Reid could - he’s done it before. Pretty much all significant transfer activity then will shift to the summer IMO
From what I've read, it seems as though Middlesbrough want £4m for Darren Randolph, Stoke want £8m for Joe Allen, and Genk want £18m for Sander Berge. I think it's unlikely that we would spend £30m this month, particularly after spending record sums in the summer.
The only way I can see those deals happening is if we sell someone, and the only person I have seen rumoured with big money interest is Issa Diop.
I could potentially see us cashing in on Diop for £40m or so and investing in those players, but honestly I think it's more likely that we sign Randolph and then maybe bring in a loan or a free from elsewhere.
Sander Berge was heavily linked to Liverpool prior to the Jan window opening. Whilst it always seems we have several targets in the same position and low ball bid (then move on), if we genuinely want a decent potential def. mid. we need to step up. That said, if a team like Liverpool come calling there's not much we can do (outside of hoping a player sees a better chance of 1st team football with us). Short version = get on it!
Hey! I can ask for myself (or steal) if I want to :whistle:
I would have to take into account on any given season how well or poorly we were doing in the league and factor in how prices have been inflated to get a more rounded view.
This would severely cut into my time and resources plus limit my involvement in matters pertaining to Liverpool
Chap off Sky says Chelsea are very hopeful of signing a PL CB this window. The guy would not confirm who as he has been ‘sworn to secrecy’ but said it is a rival PL club, he is young & promising, would cost at least £50m, & all agents involved are very confident the deal will be done.
I doubt Leics would contemplate selling Soyuncu given their league position and so soon after flogging Maguire. The only alternative to Diop I can think of would be Ake. Theyve been linked with a buy back price for him and I think there's a time limit on it.
I'd have thought they'd be prioritizing forwards (Rudiger/Christensen/Tomori/Zouma/Azp can all play CB)
If it is Diop, maybe they'll attempt to part ex with Batshuayi :weep: (I have to go there at least once every TF window)
The Guardian (unusually slightly more reliable than other newspapers) says that the Gedson Fernandes deal has stalled, we wanted an 18-month loan deal with an option to buy but it seems that Everton, Man U, Lyon and AC Milan are also interested so Benfica might he hoping for a better offer.
As alternatives they offer Joe Allen (again), Sander Berge (again) and a new name, Marseille’s Morgan Sanson although with Marseille currently 2nd and chasing a Champions League spot I'm not sure why he'd be interested in coming here.
Randolph's transfer has also stalled because of the thigh injury that has kept him out since the end of November.
Finally they mention that we could try to loan Nathaniel Clyne until the end of the season and as he's not even been on the bench once this season he must be desperate to leave Anfield. Sad when you think that in 2016-17 he played more Premier League minutes than any other Liverpool player.
Sanson was linked in the summer, so not a new name for us, and not surprising the rumour as resurfaced. Reported to be valued at £30m, there's absolutely no way we're spending that this month, let alone on one player.
It's rumoured that we're trying to get both Fernandes and Gabigol on an inital loan with an option to buy. I assume Gabigol would be a six month loan and then he'll be our marquee signing in the summer, and and Fernandes would be an 18-month loan and then he'll be the big name in summer 2021. But I expect neither to happen.
Piatek was linked yesterday, but reports this morning are that Villa have bid £24m for him, which again we can't/won't compete with.
Clyne is coming off the back of a major injury and hasn't played competitive football since; it'd be a big risk but given that Liverpool are likely to allow him to leave on loan, I can see this one happening.
Comments
survival or relegation, but not always, and if we carry on playing like we are
at the moment, we will be dragged into a relegation fight for survival.
Personally I'd be all for it, fits the mould of progressive signings mid table clubs need to make but I'd be well surprised if his value isnt closer to £20mil than the £10m we apparently bid
Think it's more of a summer move for us to go for, although more parties will be interested I'm sure
Since January 2010, we have signed 29 players in the winter transfer window. This is at an average of of £1.6m per head. Our top five most expensive January signings last decade were:
£10.8m - Robert Snodgrass - 2017
£9.18m - Jordan Hugill - 2018
£8.28m - Jose Fonte - 2017
£4.32m - Sam Byram - 2015
£2.61m - Gary O'Neil - 2011
Only a further 4 signings cost more than £1m.
In the past four winter windows we have made more money than we have spent.
2018/19 - £450k profit
2017/18 - £24.27m profit
2016/17 - £7.29m profit
2015/16 - £730k profit
2014/15 - £1.71m loss
2013/14 - £630k loss
2012/13 - £270k loss
2011/12 - £3.04m loss
2010/11 - £2.99m loss
2009/10 - £2.34m loss
My interpretation of all of this is that the club invest in the summer, and don't tend to keep a pot back for a rainy day (January). Even when we have recouped money - 2017/18 and 2016/17 - we haven't invested it.
2017/18 is particularly interested as it was Moyes' window with us. Ayew, Sakho & Fonte went out for a combined £34.53m. We brought in Hugill for £9.18m, Evra on a free, and spent £1.08m on Joao Mario's loan.
So the message is pretty clear around the big money rumours surrounding Gabigol, Berge and Piatek...
The only way I can see those deals happening is if we sell someone, and the only person I have seen rumoured with big money interest is Issa Diop.
I could potentially see us cashing in on Diop for £40m or so and investing in those players, but honestly I think it's more likely that we sign Randolph and then maybe bring in a loan or a free from elsewhere.
I would have to take into account on any given season how well or poorly we were doing in the league and factor in how prices have been inflated to get a more rounded view.
This would severely cut into my time and resources plus limit my involvement in matters pertaining to Liverpool
Diop?
Either way I dont really believe the rumour
I'd have thought they'd be prioritizing forwards (Rudiger/Christensen/Tomori/Zouma/Azp can all play CB)
If it is Diop, maybe they'll attempt to part ex with Batshuayi :weep: (I have to go there at least once every TF window)
As alternatives they offer Joe Allen (again), Sander Berge (again) and a new name, Marseille’s Morgan Sanson although with Marseille currently 2nd and chasing a Champions League spot I'm not sure why he'd be interested in coming here.
Randolph's transfer has also stalled because of the thigh injury that has kept him out since the end of November.
Finally they mention that we could try to loan Nathaniel Clyne until the end of the season and as he's not even been on the bench once this season he must be desperate to leave Anfield. Sad when you think that in 2016-17 he played more Premier League minutes than any other Liverpool player.
It's rumoured that we're trying to get both Fernandes and Gabigol on an inital loan with an option to buy. I assume Gabigol would be a six month loan and then he'll be our marquee signing in the summer, and and Fernandes would be an 18-month loan and then he'll be the big name in summer 2021. But I expect neither to happen.
Piatek was linked yesterday, but reports this morning are that Villa have bid £24m for him, which again we can't/won't compete with.
Clyne is coming off the back of a major injury and hasn't played competitive football since; it'd be a big risk but given that Liverpool are likely to allow him to leave on loan, I can see this one happening.