I think both of those things are good news. Coventry needs a loan, and if he shines he could potentially come through into the squad next season. Grady needs first team football more than we need a squad player, IMO.
Only now Fernandez as 'wonderkid' on Football manager and the odd transfer rumour
Being only 20 there is a risk he doesnt hit his potential but and 18 month loan with and option to buy seem like a coup to me (especially if funds are tight)
Addresses a problem, can play CM, adds a lot of athleticism and flair....although is probably a bit too lightweight (from what little I know) to have an immediate effect in a midfield 2
In my head we would be getting a better version of Edimilson Fernandes who was also a versatile midfielder who lacked a bit of strength
Well, no - the article you link to dates from after he left. So I don't think you can use it to argue that at the time of the signing it was considered a coup.
Unless you think that Damien Charles Lucas's opinion that 'Fernandes was one of the more impressive signings of the pre-Pellegrini, Mario Husillos era' counts as 'a few radio pundits'?
Personally, I don't. But we all have our own benchmarks, I suppose.
I don’t recollect Edmilson being seen to be a coup back then?
I am actually really really hoping we try and sign jarod Bowen. I just think he would do fantastically for us. Even if it meant us loaning him back to them for a while.
Apologies I should have written two different threads - 1) to clarify where and who had rated the Edimilson signing & 2) to show he had put in a decent performance since we allowed him to leave and could we have held onto him. I admit it was only one but he might be showing promise at Mainz but if he isn’t I can guarantee someone will quickly tell me.
I'd like Bowen too, but I think Hull know they're sitting on a £15-20m player, so won't accept us trying to low-ball them. We won't pay what it takes to get him, but I fully expect someone to.
Shame, because I think this could be another Robertson/Maddison situation.
Fernandez sounds much more likely, if only because it's mooted to be an 18 month loan; i.e. nominal transfer fee.
Prospect signings...need players on the pitch to do the work now not ones that might become hot property. Leave those signings for the summer where you know what league you are in.
Obviously not in the know but ideally when transferring out a promising youngster on the cusp of a first team place, it would certainly make sense to have a sell on clause.
At that age no-one really knows how a player will develop, if he crashes and burns, so be it but in the cases where they genuinely develop and attract a serious fee is it reasonable to assume that his prior club would have had a hand in that development.
According to a guardian article I read, we made a bid of £12m for Maddison when Moyes was last here. A few days later Hugill arrived. It didn’t come as a surprise at all to me that he ended up thriving in the Prem (to then be worth a fortune). That’s why I want us to pay what it takes for Bowen
Comments
Being only 20 there is a risk he doesnt hit his potential but and 18 month loan with and option to buy seem like a coup to me (especially if funds are tight)
Addresses a problem, can play CM, adds a lot of athleticism and flair....although is probably a bit too lightweight (from what little I know) to have an immediate effect in a midfield 2
In my head we would be getting a better version of Edimilson Fernandes who was also a versatile midfielder who lacked a bit of strength
I only mention this as he was really rated around Europe at the time but we let him go, he is not the first either to do so.
So maybe you are mis-remembering?
He was 20, and was signed for the development squad, wasn't he?
https://www.hammers.news/club-news/outstanding-edimilson-fernandes-shows-manuel-pellegrini-what-he-is-missing-after-transfer-clanger/
Unless you think that Damien Charles Lucas's opinion that 'Fernandes was one of the more impressive signings of the pre-Pellegrini, Mario Husillos era' counts as 'a few radio pundits'?
Personally, I don't. But we all have our own benchmarks, I suppose.
Have seen Gedson been linked with £40mil moves over the last 18 months
I am actually really really hoping we try and sign jarod Bowen. I just think he would do fantastically for us. Even if it meant us loaning him back to them for a while.
Shame, because I think this could be another Robertson/Maddison situation.
Fernandez sounds much more likely, if only because it's mooted to be an 18 month loan; i.e. nominal transfer fee.
Doubt if he'd be getting that sort of match time if he'd stayed here.
But we made a £3mil profit (£8mil total) on a player who never quite took his chance and would probably of struggled to develop at us
Shame we didnt put either a buy back clause or sell-on clause of he goes later for big money
At that age no-one really knows how a player will develop, if he crashes and burns, so be it but in the cases where they genuinely develop and attract a serious fee is it reasonable to assume that his prior club would have had a hand in that development.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/50970222
Fredericks and Johnson both injured so Zaba is our only option.
Injured more often that not?
And compare with other players.
If we had time.