I'd prefer incheanho over bats.Just pay the 25 mill and get it over with(wish it was that easy ;biggrin)anyway iv'e just read that leicester are odds on favourites to sign him.
According to L'Equipe Lacazette is on his way to Arsenal with Giroud told he can leave. Apparently he's not keen on a move back to France so we are - allegedly - his preferred destination.
According to L'Equipe Lacazette is on his way to Arsenal with Giroud told he can leave. Apparently he's not keen on a move back to France so we are - allegedly - his preferred destination.
See the problem is if the buy back fee is pretty close to the purchase fee, we could end up at an overall loss by the time we've paid his wages, agents fees etc. So we would be taking all the risks of ownership and enjoy none of the financial benefits if he is a success. Doesn't sound like a compelling deal (if the rumoured but back thing is true). In some ways it'd be worse than a loan.
Erm, we flirted with relegation last season. We have a chance to get a quality (hopefully) signing in.
We should not be worrying about what price we will get if Man City decide to buy him back. Our options are limited in terms of good strikers we can actually get (even though we're linked with every player in the universe).
I'd be very happy if we buy him, he has a very good season and Man City decide to buy him back in a year or two, and we make a £5m gross profit.
Rumours are Leicester are now favourites to sign him. Getting ready for the excuses, it may only be June but we appear to be following a similar path on transfers to previous windows. ;weep
I am basing it on the transfer business that certain other clubs, who are supposed to be in our bracket, the likes of Leicester and Everton, have completed so far.
What baffles me slightly is the suggestion that we'll match any offer for Giroud ;hmm
I mean, if we want him, why not make an offer for him now? It just suggests to me that he's on the back burner whilst we wait for decisions to be made elsewhere, i.e. Iheanacho or Bats, which given the debacle with Bacca last season, is a very risky game to play.
I can understand a sell on clause for Iheanacho but I doubt City will buy him back anyway. A club that size financially is able to go after players better than him. If Pep for example thought he fitted in he wouldn't be selling him and would be telling him he's in his plans.
I'm most likely being impatient but I feel frustrated that no Bats or Iheanacho good news is forthcoming
Comments
;hmm
We should not be worrying about what price we will get if Man City decide to buy him back. Our options are limited in terms of good strikers we can actually get (even though we're linked with every player in the universe).
I'd be very happy if we buy him, he has a very good season and Man City decide to buy him back in a year or two, and we make a £5m gross profit.
We need quality players in and that's extremely hard to do. We have an opportunity, so let's seize it.
I come in peace. ;ok
I am basing it on the transfer business that certain other clubs, who are supposed to be in our bracket, the likes of Leicester and Everton, have completed so far.
;sofa
I mean, if we want him, why not make an offer for him now? It just suggests to me that he's on the back burner whilst we wait for decisions to be made elsewhere, i.e. Iheanacho or Bats, which given the debacle with Bacca last season, is a very risky game to play.
I'm most likely being impatient but I feel frustrated that no Bats or Iheanacho good news is forthcoming
And the club is keeping quiet which we all wanted..
Chill the sun is shining the beer is cold and we have weeks to go....
https://bracethehammer.sbnation.com/transfer-news/2017/6/17/15823844/exwhuemployee-transfer-update
Mostly from Ex, Mrs G. I know it's not official, but he's mentioned it a few times