Yet the amount of money Southampton make on transfer profits is staggering - they lose the players, they lose top managers yet still maintain a foothold in the top half of the Prem
I think that's a complicated game to play MIA because it interferes with the game itself and decisions on the field - e.g. Is he encouraged to pass or shoot when clean through and does he/could he/should he take penalties etc.
If this is true I think our 40m figure is perfectly appropriate as there must be some compensation to taking all the risk and then having to allow him to leave. Were we to get 40m we would be able to enter the market with a full pocket when seeking a replacement. If they want 30m then lets say they have to buy him back for 15m if we wish in case he Zsa Zsas.
Comments
Liverpool aren't great at transfers, are they...
http://owngoalnigeria.com/2017/06/05/revealed-the-amount-west-ham-are-proposing-to-man-city-as-buy-back-fee-for-iheanacho/
Better the deal is kept as simple as possible IMO
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/40170131
I am wondering that it may end up being Man Utd...
Another name for the list of strikers we are linked to
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Modeste_(footballer,_born_1975)
Can't say I'm that convinced myself...
Wrong dude
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Modeste_(footballer,_born_1988)