Slaven Bilic named as West Ham Manager (09.06.15)

1707173757692

Comments

  • edited October 2017

    It wasn't effective ?

    We won lol

    Lucky that whatever problem we had in between defense and attack, Swansea had up front.

    We weren't effective, we survived.
  • Agree. Just because we won doesn’t mean there was anything inherently effective in the way we played.

    We were poor in every part of the pitch and we won because we put in a decent cross and Sakho made a decent run in the last minute. It wasn’t tactical supremacy.

    The exact same thing could have happened the other way around, with Swansea scoring and winning, and nothing in the way we approached the game would have been deemed effective. I don’t think the result is enough to condone how badly we played in every area of the pitch.
  • edited October 2017

    It wasn't effective ?

    We won lol

    Lucky that whatever problem we had in between defense and attack, Swansea had up front.

    We weren't effective, we survived.
    I've never got the argument around "lucky it wasn't so and so".....

    It was Swansea they hadn't conceded away no two games are the same, you can only beat who is in front of you

    I don't think anyone is saying it was a good performance and the manager certainly wasn't post match but it was a good 3 points. We hung in there and had the moment of quality when it mattered and made it count. Most of the players did their jobs, especially when it came to keeping them out

  • It wasn't effective ?

    We won lol

    Lucky that whatever problem we had in between defense and attack, Swansea had up front.

    We weren't effective, we survived.
    I've never got the argument around "lucky it wasn't so and so".....

    It was Swansea they hadn't conceded away no two games are the same, you can only beat who is in front of you
    That's not what I said at all.

    I said we were lucky because as much as they were able to win the ball off us and move it forward, they couldn't actually get it into a dangerous position.

    The defenders were reasonably effective but the team wasn't. We survived by chance rather than design.
  • edited October 2017
    ninja.. wrong thread...
  • edited October 2017
    You might need some practice, not sure ninjas announce their presence ;hmm

    image
  • edited October 2017
    We won because we kept a clean sheet and didn't concede a late goal. In fact we scored a late winner. Evidence that we kept on trying to the end.

    Many people have previously bemoaned our inability to do the former (what do they do in training don't they practice defending etc) or bewailed our propensity to do the latter. Or have been quick to say that conceding a late goal results from a readiness to crumble and absence of fight and passion.

    I think that those who have moaned about those things and the perceived weaknesses seem to have short memories.
    Yes it was a poor performance. Will there be others? Almost certainly. Will there be better ones? Yes. Will the best manager in the world change that? No.

    Reasons to be cheerful, part I.
  • edited October 2017
    I think the worry is that under Bilic we become a side that gets a few batterings, then when we need points, we go on a run of 4/5 games and grind out 1-0 (or ugly) wins and a few draws, playing abysmally, it moves us up the table by a few places, we then go on another bad run, before grinding out further vital points playing poorly, and this cycle just repeats. Result is that we always do enough to survive and so does Bilic, but we sit there thinking "is this the best we can expect to see".

    This pattern has been in evidence since the start of last season. This season seems to suggest a similar pattern:

    Man Utd 4-0 West Ham
    Southampton 3-2 West Ham
    Newcastle 3-0 West Ham

    West Ham 2-0 Huddersfield
    WBA 0-0 West Ham
    West Ham 2-3 Spurs
    West Ham 1-0 Swansea

    A group of three defeats followed by a group of unconvincing, but improved, results.

    I don't want the season to continue this pattern. It means we'll get a few terrible defeats, and when we do win, it will feel bittersweet, more the former than the latter. I don't think we've played well in one game this season. Ok, we were reasonable in the Cup, but that was against sides below our level. Is the side real quality? No. We have the same midfield as three years ago. Noble and Kouyate have been together since 2014. Carroll is still relied upon to determine the course of a season, same as in 2012. We still have a short-term RB just like we did with Joey O'Brien under Sam. But the side is surely better than what it's currently showing.

    In Bilic's first season, we had an identity. I know many say "it was just the Payet show". It wasn't. We were a good counter-attacking side, with adventurous full-backs, led by Payet and Antonio, who could knock the ball about well and then lob Andy on when he was fit and get the ball wide. We went through the pitch quickly, but nor through launching it, through forward thinking passes. The defence kept clean sheets, albeit was also leaky, Lanzini kept hold of the ball. The balance was good.

    We've now become an ultra defensive and cautious side, who whenever we open up a bit more, we get beaten. Bilic needs to find some system and solution to get the best out of players. That doesn't necessarily mean getting all the best players on the pitch in their best positions. If he has to leave players unhappy, so be it. If he goes with Masuaku at LW and leaves out Ayew and Arnautovic for a few weeks; £6m vs £45m of signings, so be it. If he drops Hernandez or Carroll in favour of the other, so be it. If he plays Kouyate at CB instead of his preferred CM, so be it. If he sticks Antonio at RWB as opposed to RW, so be it. We need to pick a balanced squad. At the moment it isn't. The only part that looks balanced is the back five, and that has shown in the last few weeks. Zabaleta - Fonte - Reid - Cresswell or Zabaleta - Fonte - Reid - Ogbonna - Cresswell is a well complimented back four/five, with Hart behind them. But he needs to pick a more fluid midfield and forward line and make some big calls.

    All IMO.
  • If you don't want to see that (which I get) then perhaps the owners or whoever need to spent more than £14m net in a summer window, and we need no more injuries between now and the end of the season

    Otherwise it could be more of the same and basically what we've always done
  • Oh I was jolly pleased with..

    ..the clean sheet (contextualise that with a blunt Swansea strike force).
    ..never giving up and that they kept on going that to the end (contextualise that with not conceding 1 goal which has this season has lead to the flood gates opening).
  • Payet was a very large part of it imo.

    The guy was a top 4 talent.

    Bilic just had to pick him, he then did things that had nothing to do with coaching...
  • Payet played out of his skin to get into the French squad. We miss his goals & assists.
  • Vorse agreed about Payet, when he played we always had a chance no matter if we made individual mistakes

    However you can't just say that Payet coached himself, if so why wasn't he top four the previous 10 years?

    Payet saw through some of the stuff at the club and unfortunately created a personal situation which meant he had to go back
  • I think Payet was with us and on the wave we were riding and then saw who we signed in the summer and quite rightly said hold on if that's you giving it a real go then I am off. How he went about it however was unforgivable and the club and Slav deserved much better. I can't quite help feel we missed a massive opportunity that summer which may not come again for a while and that we needed show a bit more ambition with our signings.
  • We haven't been poor all season....

    We were poor at NUFC and imploded at MUFC where many get battered, yesterday wasn't pretty but it was effective

    Man U - got battered
    Newcastle - got battered
    Southampton - spirited performance going down to 10
    Huddersfield - poor game but maybe scrapped through the win
    West Brom - as usual one of the worst games of the season
    Spurs - got played off the park until the sending off. (basically needed Spurs to do something stupid to be bothered to do something in the game ourselves)
    Swansea - poor again.

  • West Brom: Completely battered them and were unlucky not to get the win. They pretty much parked the bus.
  • How's Payet getting on now, with his top 4 talent?

  • edited October 2017
    MrsGrey said:

    How's Payet getting on now, with his top 4 talent?

    Marseille are 3rd, W5 D1 L2, 3pts behind Monaco and 6pts behind PSG, 2nd in the Europa League Group and they made Payet captain.

    The Mirror says that Bilic will be given until the end of the season to prove he deserves a new contract which fits with S&G's profile
  • We haven't been poor all season....

    We were poor at NUFC and imploded at MUFC where many get battered, yesterday wasn't pretty but it was effective

    Man U - got battered
    Newcastle - got battered
    Southampton - spirited performance going down to 10
    Huddersfield - poor game but maybe scrapped through the win
    West Brom - as usual one of the worst games of the season
    Spurs - got played off the park until the sending off. (basically needed Spurs to do something stupid to be bothered to do something in the game ourselves)
    Swansea - poor again.

    You've kind of proved my point, I already mentioned NUFC and MUFC games....

    Saints, Huddersfield and Spurs performances were acceptable enough, WBA didn't even want to win at home, you can't level that type of attitude at us, no matter how much you think we should change the manager.

    For the first 25 against Spurs we were fine, the injury and change didn't help us
  • MrsGrey said:

    How's Payet getting on now, with his top 4 talent?

    Exactly......hovering about 3rd

    In France
  • But he wanted to play in France.
  • I don't think it's fair to suggest Payet just did it by himself. He has openly said that Bilic was a father figure to him, which tells me that he must have had a bit more involvement in things than just saying "off you go lad".

    Payet made a big difference to us, but a lot of people had individually outstanding seasons that year.
  • I am questioning if Bilic makes players better in particular the forward players.

    Payet as such would be a argument for yes he can, but then I think that he was just a rare top 4 talent, a Di Canio type who you just played and let him get on with it.

    When I look at our attackers in general I haven't seen it.

    Antonio has stepped forward but it was like Bilic stumbled over him and was forced to play him due to injuries.

    We had forward players come and go, we have players currently on the books who are standing still or going backwards.

    ;hmm
  • well he has to regular bench one of our record transfers every game it seems so something isn't right recruitment or management.
  • edited October 2017
    When Liverpool lost Suarez it took them a good couple of years to recover.

    Everton look lost without their best player.

    We only lost Payet in January. It takes time.

    A team get used to a certain outlet to get goals and finding a new way isn’t easy,

    Personally I think Bilic will have a good season and then walk, thanks to our owners and fans.
  • I can't quite help feel we missed a massive opportunity that summer which may not come again for a while and that we needed show a bit more ambition with our signings.


    Not the first time and doubt it will be the last - it is a habit we have had with all our owners back to the sixties. As soon as they need to put their hands in their pockets to a large degree to improve the team and move us on a big step they shy away, only difference is that in the past we used to sell our best players to line their pockets.
  • I do think the owners have limitations on their ability or willingness to spend but I what we have spent is also not bad, not great by a long stretch, but not bad. The problem for me is the way it's been spent, last season was all about squad rather than first team and this season I just think we could maybe have spent a bit more and better. Arto is a luxury signing where as we needed a defensive midfielder, he was also a bit over priced in my view. Last season also Snodgrass ? Ayew? There lacks in my view a connected transfer policy in which we think about how they will fit together and what formation we want before buying. So yes I would have liked more spent ( but don't we always) but if what we spent was spent more coherently we could still have a more balanced team.
  • For me, last summer's transfer window showed the power of the laws of attraction. Because it was West Ham, people (bloggers, journalists, fans, etc.) discounted the possibility of bigger names moving to the club. Once the rumours started flying, it was a self-fulfilling prophecy ("Who do you want to move to?" "Not West Ham, anyway!"), and once the first "name" turned us down, it was the beginning of the end.
  • MrsGrey said:

    How's Payet getting on now, with his top 4 talent?

    Exactly......hovering about 3rd

    In France
    So as high as they can expect to be when you consider the teams above them?

    West Ham are due to a few failings that are well documented where?

    I think I know where I would rather be if you are looking for some ambition. Didn't like the way he went about things but I believe he was right to go back to Marseille. ;ok
  • You are aware that they were both internationals? Hindsight is a lovely thing but it's a fact that when Zaza came he had just played in the Euros. When Payet came he was out in the cold, nowhere near the French national team.

    I've said it often enough, it is always easy blasting someone for not spending enough, after all it isn't your own money. Same with team selection. It isn't your job on the line.
This discussion has been closed.