Summer 2017 Transfer Speculation (continued)
This discussion has been closed.
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
- 1.8K All Categories
- 1 Site Stuff
- 31 Admin (FAQs, rules, queries etc.)
- The Boleyn Arms
- 46 General Chatter
- 8 Member info & Family Album
- 3 Radio Llama (music videos)
- 523 Fun & Games
- 160 BA Predictor Threads
- 48 Word Games
- 4 Quizzes
- 2 Pun Threads
- 343 Magic Minutes
- 3 Other Fun & Games
- 139 Current West Ham
- 213 Men's First Team
- 4 Women's Team
- 13 PL2 & Academy
- 34 Management & Board
- 16 Stadium & Training Ground
- 31 West Ham Miscellaneous
- West Ham Matches
- 452 Match Threads
- 121 MOTM
- 12 West Ham Nostalgia
- 37 Former Players and Staff
- 5 Past Games & Glories
- 42 Transfers
- 50 Transfer Speculation
- 88 Completed Transfers
- 57 Internationals
- 50 Men's Internationals
- 5 Women's Internationals
- 2 Youth Internationals
- 133 Football Chatter
- 43 Football Chatter
- 281 Other Teams & Matches
- 27 Other Players & Staff
Comments
And lacking morale fibres
And lacking the will to win
And
That ado donkay that ado
Too little time now to get a new manager in and secure his targets before the window closes, so, if they are thinking seriously about getting rid of Bilic, I think they'll keep that cash to make available to a new managr in January or next summer.
It's kinda chicken and egg though, because if they don't spend the cash on Carvalho then it's much more likely they'll replace Bilic; if they'd have signed him pre-season there might not even be talk of Bilic going.
Psg signing neymar for £200mil and getting Mbappe on loan to buy for £166mil
City spent over £200mil
United £150mil
Liveprool have spent £40mil but have had a bid accepted fro Keita and maybe Lear
Whereas we have spent £40mil (recouping £30mil of it) yet can't seem to push some moves across
Just wish we could go back a couple years and change so that the Abu Dhabi group bought us instead of city
It's not that we won't pay the money it's the way the deal is structured that SL are being difficult about and if we don't have enough to pay at the initial signing then we've probably not got enough cash on hand
He in the last few seasons has become very injury prone...
If we believe SB when he said we would replace anyone who leaves, we must be looking at a wide player to replace Snodgrass. With Feghouli also being sold, we are very light on the wings (particularly risky when you consider Arnie's temperament and Antonio's muscle-testing style of play), and I think it's fair to say Fernandes is not the answer out wide.
Ayew and Arnie broke the club transfer record.
We agreed a fee for Bacca last year, but he wouldn't join us.
Our comparative transfer spend has been posted on a number of occasions, but you ignore that.
I don't see the point.
Are we a bigger club than Leicester? Define "bigger". Have we ever won the Premier league?
But in terms of where we are at the moment, I can see see Leicester being a more attractive proposition.
You were the one stating we were a bigger club than them because our fan base is bigger, and using that 'fact' to criticise our comparative dealings in the transfer window.
Clearly your criticism if strongly felt, but as it is resting on only an assumption (or a 'bet'), I don't see any reason why I would agree with you. ;ok
Actually made me lol
If true, we must have a replacement lined up.
Surely.
Wouldn't we?