It's also entirely possible Adrian has a stormer of a season and then his contract runs out and he leaves, or forces a move, or doesn't have a stormer of a season.
Yes, long term is important, but so is getting the highest quality players on the pitch that we can.
I think if we get Hart it will raise the profile of the club a bit making us more attractive to other players . It shows we have ambition and a club that's is hopefully going places and I don't mean the championship ;lol
really, really don't understand what's not to like about the Hart dealEnglands No.1 booted out by Pep because he wants a ball playing 11th man so he can lure the opposition out and hurt them that way, geezer who went to a very leaky defence in Italy....
Cracking deal when you think about some of the mistakes and wobbly's our current two have made (even tho I do like them both - just not Adrian's showboating)
Hart: 2 PL titles. 1 FA Cup. 2 League Cups. 4 PL golden gloves. 2 PL TOTS inclusions. 71 England caps.
You could also argue that Hart could have a great season, signs for us and is our No 1 keeper for the next 5 years . It will be up to our other keepers to prove they are better than him . Competition for places is what we need in all areas of the pitch.
- What we want is to bring in the quality that is going to improve our first 11.
- we are not going to get someone that we are not sure about.
- we are not looking at bringing them in to be just in or around the squad, or expect them to come good in a couple of years. We want someone to come in, put the jersey on, and play.
Also, when he says first 11 does he consider Carroll and Sakho fit? Because if they're in the first 11, then it'll be tough to find a striker that is better than them. But if his starting 11 considers that they are not available (as per usual) then that's a much easier task and we should be jumping at someone like Hernandez.
Our Biggest problem has being a fit striker who can play 30 games at least. So I would disagree our biggest problem has been addressed. Has Hart actually signed ?
Our Biggest problem has being a fit striker who can play 30 games at least. So I would disagree our biggest problem has been addressed. Has Hart actually signed ?
Our biggest problem has been our defence, not our attack.
No, he hasn't, in fairness, but it seems likely he will.
Our Biggest problem has being a fit striker who can play 30 games at least. So I would disagree our biggest problem has been addressed. Has Hart actually signed ?
Our biggest problem has been our defence, not our attack.
No, he hasn't, in fairness, but it seems likely he will.
But all last year it was "Individual error mistakes" they weren't bad defenders yet building a case for the defence was bad urgo it needs changing to stop us leaking goals. Story seems to change a lot.
But all last year it was "Individual error mistakes" they weren't bad defenders yet building a case for the defence was bad urgo it needs changing to stop us leaking goals. Story seems to change a lot.
Individual errors come because of a lack of confidence and/or concentration. A couple of title-winning leaders at the back will help massively with this.
I remember last season commenting how I really felt for our forward line when they couldn't be certain of getting a win even by scoring 3 times.
No-one is denying our need for strikers, not even the board. Our defence though was deeply worrying in both of the last two seasons, although in Slavs first season it was asked by payet etc
Apart from our defence/ keeper were leaking goals often , IMO u could also add that too many efforts on goal were being allowed through our midfield as well... I think our keepers had one of the highest amounts of shots to deal with...But To blame the defence/ keeper only is IMO a tad unfair...
Comments
I was thinking also of all the Strikers we have been linked with I think a fit AC gives us more than any of them.
But with Zab and Hart and they are both better than anything we had.
It's also entirely possible Adrian has a stormer of a season and then his contract runs out and he leaves, or forces a move, or doesn't have a stormer of a season.
Yes, long term is important, but so is getting the highest quality players on the pitch that we can.
Cracking deal when you think about some of the mistakes and wobbly's our current two have made (even tho I do like them both - just not Adrian's showboating)
Hart:
2 PL titles.
1 FA Cup.
2 League Cups.
4 PL golden gloves.
2 PL TOTS inclusions.
71 England caps.
Adrian:
Scored a penalty vs Everton.
Randolph signed a four year contract extension in July 2016 so he could be with us for another three seasons
He could even can hart in the last minute,, like the striker form man c
Lol
footballers are told where there going work, or if there going to work,,
only words until we see actual action.
No, he hasn't, in fairness, but it seems likely he will.
Just reading all the City fans comments we did a great deal.
The year before we were 5th with goals scored (65 - finished 7th) and 10th in GA (51)
14-15 We were 13th in GF (44 - finished 12th) 14th in GA (47)
Last season there were 7 games where conceding 1 less goal would have meant a draw (+7 points) and 7 where it would have meant a win (+21 pts)
We were around 15 goals worse off than our previous average.
2 more points would have moved us from 11th to 8th.
17 more would have taken us to 7th.
I think it is fair to say that last year we suffered more from not having a solid defence than missing fit strikers.
There were only 10 games where we failed to score.
There were 13 games we scored 2 or more.
That will put many a smile on Hammers fans faces .
Only way Arnie will put a smile on my face is if he scores 12-15 goals for us next season. ;ok
No-one is denying our need for strikers, not even the board. Our defence though was deeply worrying in both of the last two seasons, although in Slavs first season it was asked by payet etc