The relegation battle - get out of my league!

Cuz1

When we beat Man U debate over move on nothing to see here

OldCastleSwift

Cuz1 said:

When we beat Man U debate over move on nothing to see here

Optimism ;hmm

Wonder what that's like

grey_til_I_dye

OCS

It's that happy cheery feeling you get before a match, which lasts until about 2 minutes after kick off for the most part...

Trondheimrob

Yes Grey, I get that feeling every time and have done for 68 years. There's no fool like an old .... ;weep

MarkNobleLocalHero

Really? A great article? I have te impression of a verbose man in love with his own wordiness and contradicting himself frequently as for example;

a ground we all hate, and a schism the width of a running track between our supporters
Read more at http://www.kumb.com/article.php?id=4159#jTAMM4FuDoSLZCiy.99

We all hate it? Thanks for speaking for ALL of us but then there is "a schism the width of a running track" so perhaps not all then eh?

IronHerb

Yeah, a great article. ;ok

SuzanneClaret

We have to be safe before Everton come to town.

We just have to be.

grey_til_I_dye

bbb

My challenge (for what its worth) has always been is for those who support the current state of play to have the confidence to write a proper rebuttal of articles like this, or give a critique of the current board's actions, and be prepared to back up their point of view with debate.

Sorry, but 'have the confidence' comes across as totally patronising, as does 'proper rebuttal'.

You have views of the current state of affairs that are not shared by others, of which I am one.

It is not incumbent upon me, or anyone, to justify their disagreement with you.

The fact that people choose not to respond how you demand of them in no way invalidates their opinions.

grey_til_I_dye

You seem to be confusing factual claims with opinions.

I have no interest in whether or not you (or anyone) like or dislike the board/manager/colour of the beer trays etc.

If I see a post that appears to make a factual claim, and no source is offered, it seems reasonable to ask for a source.

If I disagree with interpretations of fact, I don't see why i shouldn't say so.

Isn't that exchanging views?

I lack neither the confidence nor the ability to write a critique, or offer rebuttals.

What I do lack is the necessary faff, since I can't see the point of using my time in such a way.

grey_til_I_dye

Separately, we have a policy of not allowing 'chivvying', for want of a better word.

That is to say, people are free to make any points they like.

Others are free to challenge those views.

Should the original poster choose not to engage further, then we don't allow others to continue to prompt them to respond further.

So, users (within site rules) are free to say what they think, but can have no expectation of others that they will respond at all, or in a way that suits.

grey_til_I_dye

I wasn't intending to be patronising, so can only apologise.

It's a discussion forum.

You made a comment, I replied.

How can that be 'vicarious'?

How can you know if the other person chooses not to engage further unless you prompt them at least once....

Hence 'continue'.

Asking once (politely), in case someone has missed it is fine.

imagelost

I love this site

imagelost

Erm thats not quiet actually accurate, I have fondness for for site

imagelost

;cheers

whupathman

this site lacks enough ;llama bring back LGH

imagelost

I am to going Boleyn arms

Cuz1

whupathman said:

this site lacks enough ;llama bring back LGH

Whatever happened to lgh

sweepy23

TODAY IS HUGE. MASSIVE. RELEGATION SQUEEKY BUM TIME.

sweepy23

If I didn’t have kids, I’d be in front of tv from 12.30 until 7.30, bitting my nails and screaming at the TV.

Come on Liverpool, Everton, Bournemouth, Leicester and Chelsea (Urgh)

horshamhammer

sweepy23 said:

Come on Liverpool, Everton, Bournemouth, Leicester and Chelsea (Urgh)

You know it's been a terrible season when we're forced to hope for a Liverpool win.

grey_til_I_dye

This, sadly, is true although I feel worse when I find myself hoping Chelsea win. ;weep

thornburyiron

I’m not proud. I’ll support anyone against anyone if it helps us.

Yeoldhammer

i thought it was about not caring what others did it only matters what we do has that gone out the window now

baracks_a_hammer

Yep

grey_til_I_dye

Discussions on today's games and ramifications moved to:

http://www.whu606.com/discussion/10553

sweepy23

Just seen Everton have a break for 8 days before playing us on the last day. We have a break of 3 days!

Moojor

Moojor said:

35 points will be safe this season:

WBA - Loss/Loss/Win - 28 points - Relegated
Stoke - Loss/Win/Draw - 33 points -Relegated
Soton - Win/Loss/Draw/Loss - 34 points - Relegated
Swansea - Loss/Loss/Draw/Draw - 35 points - Safe

WBA, Stoke and Soton still on for relegation, 35 points is safe this season. Just swap the result for last game for for this game for both WBA and Stoke around.

WBA - Win/Loss/Loss - 28 points - Relegated
Stoke - Draw/Win/Loss- 33 points -Relegated
Soton - Win/Loss/Draw/Loss - 34 points - Relegated
Swansea - Loss/Loss/Draw/Draw - 35 points - Safe

MunichHammer

Problem is, though, Mojoor, that your calculation is flawd. In their last match Stoke and Swansea play each other. How can one team lose and thr other draw? ;wink

Dodger58

Mere details Munich ;wink

Moojor

MunichHammer said:

Problem is, though, Mojoor, that your calculation is flawd. In their last match Stoke and Swansea play each other. How can one team lose and thr other draw? ;wink

meh, fine, Swansea can have a win, they are still safe and Stoke are still relegated and 35 points is still safe