Viable or not there's no way they're going to be able to sell a stadium that swallowed £762m of taxpayers' money without facing a lot of political opposition
On top of that there's UK Athletics 50 year deal, even if the LLDC sold the stadium any buyer would have to honour that or persuade them to quit
Saw in the paper how the spuds have increased capacity by 900 or so in there stadium by taking out the trophy cabinet and garage for open top bus to make room
Liverpool May have bought a few duds (including AC), however they have bought and seen Suarez, Torres and Coutinho go for massive money. And they still sit with Salah, firminho and more
But in that case isn't 'transfer policy' just another way of saying 'they buy players the manager rates'?
To be classed as an actual 'policy', I think it needs to be more than that.... maybe covering ages of players, type of contracts they get, how the deals are structured, what sort of clauses are put in the contracts and stuff like that.
But in that case isn't 'transfer policy' just another way of saying 'they buy players the manager rates'?
To be classed as an actual 'policy', I think it needs to be more than that.... maybe covering ages of players, type of contracts they get, how the deals are structured, what sort of clauses are put in the contracts and stuff like that.
Which West Ham, have being miserable at, one of the highest wage payers in the league and possibly getting relegated.
From saying we have enough money to purchase players but wouldn't buy Defoe because he had no resale value but then signing players like Fonte / Evra / Zabaleta....
West Ham's policy is the worst in the league when you measure up finances to finishing places to wages paid. Tragic.
From saying we have enough money to purchase players but wouldn't buy Defoe because he had no resale value but then signing players like Fonte / Evra / Zabaleta....
That certainly looks more constructive and fair play to DS for inviting them in.
I also read all 32 pages of the Karren B, letters to LLDC/Mayor or London, I think she handled herself quite well in those but seems to be banging her head against a brick wall. For some reason E20 do not want to play ball and it would be in their interests to do so and help reduce the cost to the taxpayer, legal action is now on the horizon and that won’t do anyone any good
Comments
On top of that there's UK Athletics 50 year deal, even if the LLDC sold the stadium any buyer would have to honour that or persuade them to quit
When facts get out!
Ok
How many times have you herd
“ it’s not built for football stadium “
I thought it would be better then it was.
So it's not a joint venture any more, but wholly-owned by whatever the LLDC is called now?
E20 owns it, no? LS185 runs it
https://www.facebook.com/lee.mackman.1/videos/980608882120465/?notif_id=1521472942490460¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic
MrsGrey - I don't think bought by the same club is the same thing as transfer policy. I can't imagine Lambert being bought by Klopp different style.
But in that case isn't 'transfer policy' just another way of saying 'they buy players the manager rates'?
To be classed as an actual 'policy', I think it needs to be more than that.... maybe covering ages of players, type of contracts they get, how the deals are structured, what sort of clauses are put in the contracts and stuff like that.
"but that same transfer policy bought the first three players originally..."
My point was that just because players are bought by the same club it doesn't mean the thing as the same transfer policy.
From saying we have enough money to purchase players but wouldn't buy Defoe because he had no resale value but then signing players like Fonte / Evra / Zabaleta....
West Ham's policy is the worst in the league when you measure up finances to finishing places to wages paid. Tragic.
The same transfer policy (same season, same manager) bought Firmino and Benteke.
Or the same manager? Rogers brought in Borini and Firmino. (But in different seasons.)
Not so simple to execute.
Otherwise everybody would be doing it ;wink
I also read all 32 pages of the Karren B, letters to LLDC/Mayor or London, I think she handled herself quite well in those but seems to be banging her head against a brick wall. For some reason E20 do not want to play ball and it would be in their interests to do so and help reduce the cost to the taxpayer, legal action is now on the horizon and that won’t do anyone any good
Oh dear.....