Dele alli dives for his penalty against Burnley so he must get a ban. His dive was ridiculous.
Sickens me how, because it's flavour of the month Spurs, Gerrard and Jenas are both saying he's entitled to go down if there's any contact, not picking up on the fact that he is 100% on the way down before the contact, and also completely ignoring Jake Humphrey when he says he's a big strong lad and that the contact was minimal.
Regardless of what happened to Lanzini, this is just plain wrong. If the contact was on the halfway line that contact wouldn't have sent Alli over, and wouldn't be a foul.
iPhone users having problems with the page jumping about - just hit ‘done’ above your keyboard before you go to Post Comment. It’s still a bit tricky trying to edit inside the post but this solves the main problem
Dele alli dives for his penalty against Burnley so he must get a ban. His dive was ridiculous.
Just watched MOTD (recorded) and the dive was more blatant than Lanzini's! If Lanzini (quite rightly) gets punished then Alli has to be! And to be honest I thought his tackle at the start of the match should've got him sent off anyway. Really really horrible player he is.
Bbc said it was. Penalty but they love Spurs I think he was going down before the tackle came in but you can bet he will get away with it , they were so busy raving about Harry Kane they barely mentioned it
As part of my Christmas present my son, the spud, bought me a ticket to the spurs game on the 4th. To be able to do this he had to buy me a membership too so I’m now a member of both clubs. Is there a FIFA ruling against this. ;biggrin
I saw that somewhere else (a link posed on another thread).
Look, fair play to him, his dad is rich and is helping him out. Isn't that what most parents would want to be able to do (although perhaps do a lesser degree)? If I won gazillions on the lottery, I'd be buying houses for my family.
Live and let live, and all that.
BUT
I really hate the premise he puts out that 'he deserves it (more) because he works hard(er)'.
Well, mate - lots of people work hard. Do they deserve such luxury? So why aren't they getting it?
Lots of people DON'T work hard, but have such luxury. Why isn't it being taken away from them?
This pernicious link being made as a way to justify excessive wealth and dismiss desperate poverty is disgusting.
I wish he'd just say that he's massively fortunate. And then shut up.
Comments
It's added 7 visits since yesterday, so perhaps it only updates at certain points.
11,101 visits or it could be the number of times I’ve edited posts and not told anyone ;devil ;biggrin
Regardless of what happened to Lanzini, this is just plain wrong. If the contact was on the halfway line that contact wouldn't have sent Alli over, and wouldn't be a foul.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5214983/Inside-Dave-Sullivan-Jrs-lavish-London-bachelor-pad.html
I saw that somewhere else (a link posed on another thread).
Look, fair play to him, his dad is rich and is helping him out. Isn't that what most parents would want to be able to do (although perhaps do a lesser degree)? If I won gazillions on the lottery, I'd be buying houses for my family.
Live and let live, and all that.
BUT
I really hate the premise he puts out that 'he deserves it (more) because he works hard(er)'.
Well, mate - lots of people work hard. Do they deserve such luxury? So why aren't they getting it?
Lots of people DON'T work hard, but have such luxury. Why isn't it being taken away from them?
This pernicious link being made as a way to justify excessive wealth and dismiss desperate poverty is disgusting.
I wish he'd just say that he's massively fortunate. And then shut up.