Something doesn't feel right about this. If it's true, then the board have basically agreed a deal with City and Iheanacho without consulting the manager. The same manager that has said that he and the board are always talking about transfer targets.
Can't see it myself.
Which means C&H is just stirring the proverbial to turn people against the manager ;hmm
Was it ever on though? If the terms of the deal were as reported we are quite right to give it a wide berth - basically a loan with all the downside risk falling on us
Something doesn't feel right about this. If it's true, then the board have basically agreed a deal with City and Iheanacho without consulting the manager. The same manager that has said that he and the board are always talking about transfer targets.
Not necessarily, OCS.
It could be interpreted as Bilic was OK with it in principle... but not the final deal? Maybe once Sully negotiated the agreement acceptable to the player and City, he put it to the manager for a final approval and Bilic said no, not on those terms? Perhaps because the amount City want would mean there was less left in our budget to buy the quality of striker Bilic wanted (ie 'proven') so wasn't willing to give the ;ok to the Iheanacho deal. He didn't want to rely on that player as our 'main' new striker buy?
West Ham Twitter has gone into meltdown again. Knives are really out for Bilic.
So much negativity around the club and we're nowhere near our heavy defeat to Man U yet.
This is why I despise ITKs.
1. Twit puts unsubstantiated information out. 2. Said player signs for another club or Twit puts out a second unsubstantiated story saying club are no longer interested. 3. Morons abuse the club/owners/manager for not signing player.
Either way it's one extreme to another Last year owners where on the TV every Other week or the radio this time no signings and nothing from them it beggars Believe how much rubbish we put up with Not happy players going out nothing coming in I think we have lost the plot .
In a troubled, uncertain world where we're not sure what makes sense and whats going to happen anymore.... It's always good to know you can rely on Brookingsirons for some good, old-fashioned, consistency of pessimism ;thumbsup
I enjoy a speculative discussion about prospects as much as anyone else but in truth, the transfer window is one of those times where actions speak far louder than words.
I for one, am happy that we are keeping fairly quiet as I see little upside in constantly talking to the press about intentions and wishes.
Come the end of the window, if in fact we have not added meaningfully to the squad and let a number of players leave, then the lack of action will certainly lead to a plethora of words, and rightly so
until then however........... I am going to stick to my original assertion that Giroud would be a great signing, so there ;wink
Comments
Another one off the list
Can't see it myself.
Which means C&H is just stirring the proverbial to turn people against the manager ;hmm
So much negativity around the club and we're nowhere near our heavy defeat to Man U yet.
It could be interpreted as Bilic was OK with it in principle... but not the final deal? Maybe once Sully negotiated the agreement acceptable to the player and City, he put it to the manager for a final approval and Bilic said no, not on those terms? Perhaps because the amount City want would mean there was less left in our budget to buy the quality of striker Bilic wanted (ie 'proven') so wasn't willing to give the ;ok to the Iheanacho deal. He didn't want to rely on that player as our 'main' new striker buy?
31st August = Diego Costs (loan to Jan 18) = party time
#ITK
But they'd better be confident of securing some of their other targets because we can only imagine the fall out if we have a repeat of last summer.
1. Twit puts unsubstantiated information out.
2. Said player signs for another club or Twit puts out a second unsubstantiated story saying club are no longer interested.
3. Morons abuse the club/owners/manager for not signing player.
And then repeat.
As normal me... ;wahoo ;angry ;weep
I find it difficult to believe that Bilic would veto Iheanacho
But then again, I find it difficult to believe that
VetoVito Corleone would be able to spell Iheanacho.So where are we again?
I want Iheanacho!!
I want a sexy manager too!!
#Bats too painful to type about ;weep
Last year owners where on the TV every
Other week or the radio this time no signings and nothing from them it beggars
Believe how much rubbish we put up with
Not happy players going out nothing coming in I think we have lost the plot .
Following on from last Jan, where Bilic was 'happy with his squad and it was his call to go with the forwards we had'.
Somehow.
Maybe another. Relegation battle is what we need again ;doh
I for one, am happy that we are keeping fairly quiet as I see little upside in constantly talking to the press about intentions and wishes.
Come the end of the window, if in fact we have not added meaningfully to the squad and let a number of players leave, then the lack of action will certainly lead to a plethora of words, and rightly so
until then however........... I am going to stick to my original assertion that Giroud would be a great signing, so there ;wink
Just when I thought they were all gonna stay silent.
Before these top players sign on .
Can't wait for the day they sell up tbo .
Get someone in with real ambitions.