I'd like them both, but Siggy has been more influential in a struggling team this season (IMO, which I am open to changing when wonderful facts are revealed.) If we end up with neither, I shall not be happy.
So, C&H print story linking a player, and then the story is 'player linked'.
All a bit circular.
As C&H says the story is from the Mirror on Saturday. What is noticeable is that while there's a quote from Bilic on Defoe there isn't a quote about Adams, just that we need " players who can make a difference"
The Sun also quotes Bilic on Defoe - and actually uses his full quote which the Mirror doesn't - but doesn't mention Adams at all.
“We are going to have to take some risks because we are not a Real Madrid or a Manchester United.
“They can get a player who is no risk and just say 'get him here.' We can't do that.
“Either you take a risk on players who have possibly made it in a lower league or somebody who did it two years ago and then maybe had a little blip and you hope he's going to do it again.
“Maybe he’s a little in injury prone or who is a strange character. It is hard for us to get those who are a 10 out of 10.”
Sigs game is about delivery. Teams may want him but away from Swansea he didnt stand out at all at Spurs. Lanzini IMO is different class (even without the WHU bias).
I worry that our buying Snodders may mean we don't get Siggers. I mean to say if we hadn't have bought Snodders, perhaps Swansea would have gone down instead of Hull, and Siggers would have been easier to buy (for us but of course for others too). Anyway, I'd prefer Siggers over Snodders, but am not sure we can have both.
Sell Lanzini? Messi's favourite player? Don't even go there...
Disagree. Lanzini is involved in the game all the time whereas Siggy disappears at times.
This is probably a common view amongst West Ham fans because West Ham fans will likely scrutinise West Ham games and players in greater detail than players of other clubs. I'm sure there will be many Swansea fans who will beg to differ
He's not an upgrade of on what we have though....doesn't really make sense unless we intend to get rid of both Randolph and Adrian and get ruddy and a new #1
Comments
Can't we have both?
The Sun also quotes Bilic on Defoe - and actually uses his full quote which the Mirror doesn't - but doesn't mention Adams at all.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/west-ham-eye-jermain-defoe-10415810
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/3554274/west-ham-boss-slaven-bilic-is-determined-to-bring-jermain-defoe-back-home-as-he-targets-a-move-for-the-sunderland-striker/
Looks like a piece of "creative" journalism by the Mirror
“We are going to have to take some risks because we are not a Real Madrid or a Manchester United.
“They can get a player who is no risk and just say 'get him here.' We can't do that.
“Either you take a risk on players who have possibly made it in a lower league or somebody who did it two years ago and then maybe had a little blip and you hope he's going to do it again.
“Maybe he’s a little in injury prone or who is a strange character. It is hard for us to get those who are a 10 out of 10.”
Bony, Sturridge and Balotelli on the list then...
Sell Lanzini? Messi's favourite player? Don't even go there...
They should be posted to the top of any transfer thread....
Also I think Defoe will happen, for hi, to say this is home in such a positive and open manner...
The highest West Ham can finish this season is 9th, winning £22.8m prize money, the lowest is 16th, which would earn the club £9.5m.
Raul Jiminez ;hmm
Also linked to Bony again
I think Bony is more likely than Jimenez, to be honest
New goalkeeper ;hmm