Board/Fan Relationship

1232426282952

Comments

  • Thanks Grey.

    Reading the KUMB post from Herb... ;hmm I not sure what the chant will be for the March...

    But at least they are getting their points across, not surprised the owners weren't their TBH.

    Social media scale back is good, signing quality players I think we are and also not forced to sell our best players.

    Surprised the retractable seating and future plans for the stadium wasn't raised as they are my main concern..
  • If we were like Southampton I'd support Portsmouth.
  • edited February 2018
    IronHerb said:
    Thanks for that Herbie ;ok

    Possibly my favoutire bit:

    "Karren made the statement she would do anything to make WHU fans happy , to which we asked her to give up her column in the Sun which she refused point blank to even consider."

    So not quite anything then, Karren ;lol
  • For me the biggest complaint I've had with WH during my years of Support is that we always sell our best players.

    We haven't had to do that by and large since the Davids took over.

    Which is probably the biggest reason why I am a little bit ;hmm to all this march stuff.
  • edited February 2018
    We haven't Vorse, but on that point I'm always worried that we will.

    We ultimately lost Payet because of our (perceived) lack of ambition, and I do worry that unless we invest heavily (or, at least, intelligently) in the players that will take us forward as a club then I fear we'll always be a stepping stone for ambitious players.

    Lanzini, Arnautovic, Antonio, even Masuaku; I can see these players looking elsewhere if we continue to tread water as we are, and I doubt they'll be short of suitors.
  • IronHerb said:

    If we were like Southampton I'd support Portsmouth.

    Blue Army ;wahoo

    (Pompey is my home city)
  • edited February 2018
    If we had a much better start to the season I think a lot of the issues raised would not be issues anymore.

    My biggest issue is the stadium it's not what we were told it would be. No amount of on the pitch success with change the temporary feel of a lot of it.
  • OCS, I don't think it's unique to our club or even recent years. (The stepping-stone thing, I mean). It's just the nature of the business and the nature of the players, who have a limited period in which to earn as much and win as much as they can.

    Look at Walker, Sanchez, Sterling, Suarez, Mahrez, Neymar, Ronaldo, - were players at clubs with trophies and ambition but who still treated the clubs as stepping stones.

    I can't foresee any level of investment or any level of ambition that would be a barrier to this happening.

  • edited February 2018
    OCS - Didn't Payet just want to go back to France?

    I'm sure if he wanted too he could have joined Spurs / Liv etc after the season he had with us.

    I know what your feeling but until it happens I don't think its fair to judge them on what may happen.

    I don't think we built on the Payet season, DS transfer actions and maybe out ex HOR who didn't want African players were to blame. I wouldn't disagree with that.
  • edited February 2018

    If we had a much better start to the season I think a lot of the issues raised would not be issues anymore.

    My biggest issue is the stadium is not what we were told it would be. No amount of on the pitch success with change the temporary feel of a lot of it.

    And, tbf, that is a massively big issue. Anybody who wants to protest with the stadium as their main motivation is entitled to do so.
  • We were told to expect one thing and imho were given something else.

    That is a protest issue I can get behind, although I won't be joining the march.
  • Can I ask if any of the season ticket holders on here were asked about the club badge?
  • edited February 2018

    Can I ask if any of the season ticket holders on here were asked about the club badge?

    There were 3 rounds of consultation.

    There was a (very well publicised) public poll at the time, open to anyone with a purchase history.

    And prior to that, the fans on the Supporter Advisory Board were consulted.

    And prior to that, there was a separate consultation about what elements of a badge design people felt were most important. (I can't remember if that was restricted in any way - it must have been, in order to prevent fans of other clubs scuppering it. But I can't remember exactly how they restricted it - at a guess, I'd say purchase history again. I'll see if I can find out ;ok )
  • I was asked.

    But I was on the SAB.

    I’ve never liked the castle.
  • We ultimately lost Payet because of our (perceived) lack of ambition
    Eeerrrr OCS hold on there, who says? We lost him because he wanted to go back to France he was homesick. That should not be laid at the boards door.
  • Discussion of anti-doping administrative cods up is on 'didn't know where to put and and decided it didn't need a new thread' ;ok
  • We ultimately lost Payet because of our (perceived) lack of ambition
    Eeerrrr OCS hold on there, who says? We lost him because he wanted to go back to France he was homesick. That should not be laid at the boards door.

    From Payet himself:
    "There were several reasons, but the first one was sporting: West Ham's objectives were no longer the same from the season before, and I felt danger for my football and my place in the France national team"
  • I think he wanted to go back to France so he could play in a proper football stadium. He seemed happy at The Boleyn...........................
  • edited February 2018
    OCS, that quote doesn't mean necessarily what you said it means. It is open to interpretation, and you have interpreted it one way. There are others.



    Plus, Payet's always going to be looking to blame someone or something else isn't he, and trying to cast himself in a good light after his bad behaviour?


    We were also told it was a family issue.
  • OMG!

    Please don’t tell me the Payet temper tantrum is getting a re-brand.

  • Yeah! He didn't like the new badge. ;biggrin
  • Whatever you want to call it he appears to be proved right!
  • "There were several reasons, but the first one was sporting: West Ham's objectives were no longer the same from the season before, and I felt danger for my football and my place in the France national team"
    And look how good that's panned out Dimi ;lol ;lol ;lol
  • Expat,

    Sorry missed something there, playing for a team that's 3rd in the league and played for the national team last October!
  • Could have another re run of this as Arnie has been unleashed as an out and out striker and could be the next Luakaku, strong, skillfull (more so than Lukaku) and a finisher. I think teams will come in for him in the summer and feel that Arnie does what Arnie feels is best for Arnie, hence the treatment he got from Stoke fans. This means he may need some persuading to remain by us showing ambition in the transfer market. Other wise we may, I say may, have Payet mark 2.

    He may a complete gentleman and honour his recently signed contract of last summer but if Chelsea were even thinking of Carroll etc, Arnie is the perfect signing for them.
  • I thought he'd not played for a while, oh well .................
  • Macca - but if that is the case, as OCS has said before, why move us to the LS?

    If they never intended to spend their money longer term and only invest based on revenue and player sales, we should’ve stayed put.

    It raises the suspicion that they did it for their own gain and nothing more.
  • Macca85 said:


    As a business if we are only making 25mil per season it’s just NEVER gonna happen, they have already stated they do not wish to spend there kids inheritance and I for one agree with that there families futures are far more important.

    Their families futures are far more important to them

    I would argue the state of West Ham United FC is far more important to the fans, and I'm pretty sure that if the fans were told that we would only spend c.£25m per season, there would have been a hell of a lot more resistance to the move to the LS.
  • edited February 2018
    Macca

    You are taking that quote out of context:
    I'm not in the business of risking my wealth, my granddaughter's inheritance," he says. "But I will go the extra mile for West Ham. I would not have come in in the first place if it hadn't been West Ham.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/david-gold-my-dad-was-in-jail-we-were-in-abject-poverty-west-ham-was-pure-escapism-2364751.html

    He said something similar recently, referring to SImon Jordan doing his dough at Palace.

    His point is that neither of them are going to throw mad money at the club, but we already knew that.

    It is not that they will not inject some of their own money.
Sign In or Register to comment.