Summer 2017 Transfer: The final countdown and the fallout

11112131416

Comments

  • This whole episode is nothing but embarrassing.

    1) Why are we in a fight with Sporting? Irrespective who is right or wrong it paints the club in a bad light and others will be wary of doing business with us.

    2) Why is the fight so public? If DS didn't shout his mouth off, any disagreements could've been dealt with behind closed doors.

    3) If clubs have acted inappropriately they normally just get referred to Fifa/Uefa. Why has this become such a public slagging match?

    4) If real, the offer email is a disgrace. The presentation and vocab is a joke. Do they know about attachments and letter headed paper?

    5) If the owners are going to court, then keep your mouth shut until the case. For me this proves they will never go to court and are trying desperately to save face.

    6) Sporting are now reporting us to Fifa for tapping up the player, which supposedly will force all correspondence into the public domain.

    7) If we were serious, where are the other offers? There would have been negotiations. I remember reading that other offers were put forward and that we were only 3m euros away from their 35m valuation. I also remember reading that they wanted nearly all of it upfront. Was this all just spin to make the fans think we were trying when in fact we weren't?

    8) Again if the email is real, DS supposedly works 24/7 on transfers. The email looked like it took all of 2 minutes to write.

    9) DS should just be a grown up and pick up the phone to Sporting and deal with this privately.

    10) Why are email addresses blacked out on the email?

    I'm sorry but this whole episode is a such a damning indictment of West Ham and the world of football in general. The amount of money, the global reach, the customers involved, wages being paid less than the minimum wage, the pretense of professionalism, when you really know it is still a lads club, run by people who make dodgy deals, hide money, lie and are complete chancers. It is a billion dollar global industry, being run like a market stall.

  • edited September 2017
    On 1, Do you think it would paint the club in abetter light if the owner was called a liar and worse, and that was just left unchallenged. In what way would that give other clubs confidence to do business with us?

    2,3 and 5. When did DS shout his mouth off? In what way is it a 'slanging match'? He made a short and fairly uncontroversial comment about why the Carvalho deal didn't go through, indicating it was his choice not to proceed in the circumstances. The Sporting president came out and called them names in public. DS hasn't responded in kind, he has kept quiet apart from a simple statement repeating that they did put in a bid for the player. The only thing that has been said publicly is that Dav Jr has stated that Sullivan will be taking legal action. Since then, there has been no public comment by DA (so, as you say, he is keeping his mouth shut.)

    And if the emails are just spoofs/fakes?

    PS, what money have they hidden? Do tell!
  • edited September 2017
    Those letters surely cannot be real why would you ever refer to the club under WHU in an official letter of intent for a player. Surely it would be West Ham United Football Club.

    Then you would write in a letter you are borrowing a player from PSG if this does not happen.

    The letters seem like complete fakes and to stupid to even consider real. Im sure DS has enough business nous to know in matters like transfers a more professional and legitimate letter would be produced and i imagine it wouldn't come straight from David Sullivans e-mail, surely there would be an official West Ham United e-mail account to deal with such dealings as Transfers and the such.
  • edited September 2017
    For me, if they are genuine, I think the language and presentation (and lack of proofreading) is unprofessional.

    I have no issue with making an opening offer of a lower price than the club claims itwants - everybody does it. eg, Everton/Sigurdsson, Roma/Mahrez, Sampdoria/Wilshere, Man City/Mendy. It's not 'embarrasing'.

    I also have no issue with the proposals to spread the fee over 3 years. Again, that is quite normal. All clubs do it.
  • MrsGrey said:

    On 1, Do you think it would paint the club in abetter light if the owner was called a liar and worse, and that was just left unchallenged. In what way would that give other clubs confidence to do business with us?

    2,3 and 5. When did DS shout his mouth off? In what way is it a 'slanging match'? He made a short and fairly uncontroversial comment about why the Carvalho deal didn't go through, indicating it was his choice not to proceed in the circumstances. The Sporting president came out and called them names in public. DS hasn't responded in kind, he has kept quiet apart from a simple statement repeating that they did put in a bid for the player. The only thing that has been said publicly is that Dav Jr has stated that Sullivan will be taking legal action. Since then, there has been no public comment by DA (so, as you say, he is keeping his mouth shut.)

    And if the emails are just spoofs/fakes?

    1. This has come out because of the way the club have conducted their business. If you treat people you do business with, with respect. When things go wrong, it doesn't come out in public. The fact that this has come out in the first place is in itself an example of how we conduct ourselves. Whatever the mechanics it is embarrassing that the club are going through this.

    2,3 and 5. When has he not? From the get go he was stating that we didn't sign Carvalho because SL came back too late in the day. He was already blaming the other side. Blaming SL for coming back late or Slav for not wanting two other players as a reason why we didn't sign anyone, isn't acceptable for me. He's just giving excuses. If he'd just keep his mouth shut and apologise for not getting any other deals over the line none of this would've started.

    I'm sorry but whatever people say, this is not positive for the football club. If responsibility doesn't sit with the owners then where does it sit?

    It's a shame seeing West Ham constantly in the press for the wrong reasons. It would be nice to be able to have a sense of pride and honour back into our football club.

    Now they are saying they will go to court. What a load of lies. Watch this space.
  • Maybe they'll settle out of court in private. That would be your preferred option, I take it?
  • edited September 2017
    I know sports journalism isn't the best but I don't think Sky Sports would be publishing them if they hadn't verified them - it's not just a transfer rumour, it would be bad for them if they got it wrong.

    If they're fake, Sky Sports are stupider than I thought.
  • MrsGrey said:

    Maybe they'll settle out of court in private. That would be your preferred option, I take it?

    Yes it would be my preferred option, but unfortunately it will now be a lose lose for both sides. The rumours will just escalate.

    However I feel that SL will take this to Fifa and we won't go anywhere. We will try and sweep it under the carpet.
  • Hope it goes to court any more reason to unravel this clubs finances is fine by me. The figures don't match up.
  • edited September 2017
    I actually hope I am completely wrong, that the club are indeed correct and do take them to court and win. I hope that we are the better party here.

    I just can't see it.
  • Its all deflecting away from the fact we were never bidding anywhere near SL
    valuation of the player and lets face it they wouldn't sell him to us in January now if we was the last team on earth ..

    True or not why does this always happen to us ?

    Circus is the word i feel today .

  • Its all deflecting away from the fact we were never bidding anywhere near SL
    valuation of the player and lets face it they wouldn't sell him to us in January now if we was the last team on earth ..

    True or not why does this always happen to us ?

    Circus is the word i feel today .

    If we were the last team on earth, SL wouldn't be a team and he could join us on a free. Not sure there would be much point though, because it's not like there would be anyone for us to play against.
  • This is more interesting ;biggrin

    IMG_3133
  • What on earth is going on?
  • Soon I'm going to wake up...
  • Christ, this is utterly awful. This stems (IMO) from the owners' stupid (and potentially misplaced) pride being put before the good of the club's image.

    They have a responsibility for something larger than themselves, and in view of that should keep a dignified silence on something like this, rather than desperately defend themselves.

    Very poor.
  • Haha

    Absolutely hilarious. Time and time again we say all they need to do sometimes is keep it buttoned. It's not only the situation with SL that has caught fire, but also I suspect their own manager isn't best thrilled either.

    Utterly mindless from Sully and he deserves every ounce on flak that comes his way for this situation which is entirely of his own making.
  • It's like everyday at work people say "have you seen the latest on west ham?" Then I try to defend them and fail. Go home and then the next day the same ;weep
  • I bet, on hearing all of this, Rafa simply cannot wait to climb on board..
  • edited September 2017
    Why try to defend them?

    You didn't 'cause' it.
    By all means correct the reports if they are factually wrong, but it's not your responsibility to defend the decisions of a bunch of people you don't know and have no control over, surely?
  • I refer to my earlier post. Sully should have said nothing. What a mess.
  • edited September 2017
    I try to defend West Ham because I love them. If you mean the owners no I won't bother trying to defend them but West Ham yes.
  • edited September 2017
    ;weep I know. But that's like defending your wife's drug-dealing dad because you love her. That way madness lies.

    (That's an example. Not in any way an allegation ;whome)
  • Actually, not ninja because I am on the phone. More 'arthritic' and 'not got my reading glasses on'.
  • edited September 2017
    An example which is what happens would be. "Your club is a bit of a joke at the moment" so I'm like "Yes the owners are (imo) but not the rest of us"
  • Tbh I think any genuine fan of any club has been in the same situation where some mad things have gone on and been pored over in the media with glee. They know what it's like. They don't hold you personally responsible.

    Anyone who doesn't behave like that is just the equivalent of a troll and why would I care about anything they say?
  • If the email is in fact legit (which I personally doubt) then a good reason to redact email addresses etc is that I would not want my email address to be available to all and sundry. I am sure the clubs have official emails but they are mist certainly not the top brass' contact details.

    Just imagine the uproar if it were legit and the email addresses had been left in. The Daves would be forced to change their email address within minutes!
  • Plenty of fans dont like their owners. Perhaps others arent in the media as much but the biggest issue is that we've started the season very poorly. If we werent 0pts and 10 goals conceded, Arnautovic sent off, key players like Antonio, Reid and Lanzini either injured, not match fit, just returning etc then I think the fans wouldnt be so despondent currently.

    Stating the obvious... We need to beat Huddersfield and pick up some points beyond that. That'd help!

    However, my current memory of our last game (with sideways and backwards passing when we were 2 down then 3 down) against a 'championship level' Newcastle side just felt like there was no plan, no system, precious little creativity and coordination. Perhaps desire too...

    We have good players. Most of us will agree with that. But, for me, the really worrying thing was that I was watching (impatient and irritated at the lack of urgency and penetration without the capacity to defend well being mentioned til now) were the things mentioned above.

    I never wanted Bilic as manager (Marcelo Bielsa was my hope however viable that was) but since the appointment, as a fan, I obviously wanted him to be a success. I just dont currently have any faith that he knows what hes doing. Maybe the team dont listen? Maybe we really dont have an identifiable plan A and B etc.

    I just dont think hes the man to lead us and I wonder how long it'll go on and how poorly we'll have to play before some action is taken. I really hope I am surprised and we start to play as a cohesive, solid attacking/defending team.

    There's a lack of faith in that at the moment and this Sporting Lisbon business will hardly help with club morale or faith in the owners and their credibility!

    I havent posted in a while (the teams state at the moment hardly helped) so forgive the lengthy posting please...
Sign In or Register to comment.