The writer has phrased it in a way that tries to give a negative view of the length of time it took, as a way of criticising the FA...
.. but it can't take less, on account of the established schedule to allow time for the ref's report to be submitted, and the time allowed to the appealing Club to submit its evidence. And then then the panel has to be convened, according to the normal routine, assess the evidence and reach a decision. And then the FA has to put out its press release.
So not sure how the timescale is in any way relevant to the argument he is building...
They don't have a panel that just reviews all reffing decisions and rights wrongs pro-actively.
Also as per the club announcement West Ham United can confirm that a Football Association Regulatory Commission has upheld the Club’s claim for wrongful dismissal in respect of the red card shown to Cheikhou Kouyate against Crystal Palace.
Must have been a great disappointment for Mr Sam Wallace (the author of the article) - he claims neutrality but a quick perusal of his 'previous' suggests that he is a Gooner through and through. He used to be correspondent on the Independant until his boss moved to the Telegraph and hired him to replace Henry Winter (who has moved on to the Times). If you can be bovvered check out some of his old stuff - he don't like us! Oh - and his article is absolute uninformed tripe. ;wink
Oh and ......... He (Sam Wallace), really doesn't have much of a background in 'football' - for most of his working life he is described as a news correspondent. He left uni with an English Lit. Degree and went to work, initially at the Telegraph as an office boy (sorry newsroom trainee). But - he did say, when somebody bothered to interview him "I have always liked football" - so that's alright then.
Just seen the Lazio v Roma game - the ref was utterly shocking - at least SIX straight mistakes all obvious and three of them leading directly to goals , don't think even clatters could have managed that
Comments
Stand down, all rise
Shouldn't this be on the Fit & Healthy thread? ;poormf
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/04/06/referee-mark-clattenburg-is-hung-out-to-dry-by-the-fa/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
First paragraph, refers to refs judging tackles.
But it wasn't a tackle was it. There were 2 players competing for the ball that was there to be won.
So I'm already a bit ;hmm about the article.
The writer has phrased it in a way that tries to give a negative view of the length of time it took, as a way of criticising the FA...
.. but it can't take less, on account of the established schedule to allow time for the ref's report to be submitted, and the time allowed to the appealing Club to submit its evidence. And then then the panel has to be convened, according to the normal routine, assess the evidence and reach a decision. And then the FA has to put out its press release.
So not sure how the timescale is in any way relevant to the argument he is building...
;hmm Will have to investigate.
They don't have a panel that just reviews all reffing decisions and rights wrongs pro-actively.
Also as per the club announcement
West Ham United can confirm that a Football Association Regulatory Commission has upheld the Club’s claim for wrongful dismissal in respect of the red card shown to Cheikhou Kouyate against Crystal Palace.
If you can be bovvered check out some of his old stuff - he don't like us!
Oh - and his article is absolute uninformed tripe. ;wink
But - he did say, when somebody bothered to interview him "I have always liked football" - so that's alright then.
Referee Mark Clattenburg is again hung out to dry by the FA after key decision is overturned...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/04/06/referee-mark-clattenburg-is-hung-out-to-dry-by-the-fa/
Not allowed to say anything negative about Leicester or it's players..
Ref appointed : Everton v West Ham / Man Utd...
Anthony Taylor ( this is not a belated Aprils fools ).... ;run
We head the power rankings but are now -11 on the rubbish calls from the official's rankings.