Dimi Payet; the Epilogue

1111214161775

Comments

  • Munich

    I agree on the Green 'giving his all' assessment but the club offered him a new contract, he said no so they offered him an improved deal. He said no again.

    They were trying to persuade him to stay right up until he walked out of the door.

    Green is on record as saying the time for him to move on had come and there was nothing WH could have done to make him stay. It was obvious I thought that he was saying goodbye at the Play-Off final.
  • ;ok

    Green was not a 'take that' departure.

    It was more he'd been here five/six years, like he was at Norwich, and wanted a change of scenery.

    Even if QPR hadn't come in, I still feel he'd left for another club.
  • I'm happy with rewarding our best player with an improved deal.
    IMO everyone should be well pleased ..
    ;ok
  • edited February 2016
    http://www.whufc.com/News/Articles/2016/February/12-February/The-love-affair-continues-(1)

    I was thinking that 'the love affair continues' was a bit OTT, but now I see it is Dimi's own words. So that's OK then.

    Love the crossed hammers at the end.


    ;biggrin
  • edited February 2016
    I do find it odd in modern football that players agree to a contract, do what they're paid for then get a new contract to say well done within a year.

    But I think with our policy we seem to get players from abroad on low wages. I remember Sakho was rumoured to be on only £15,000 a week, so got a wage rise when he was banging in goals. Same with Kouyate. He's rumoured to be on around £15,000 a week too so we are now in talks with him over a new deal. Our highest paid players seem to be those from English leagues.

    Payet was probably on more than that, but was probably not on mega money. So his ability which he's shown probably makes him worthy of top four wages.

    But, what happened to FFP? ;hmm ;wink
  • He's getting Jelly's, so no overall increase ;ok





    #probably
  • MrsGrey said:

    http://www.whufc.com/News/Articles/2016/February/12-February/The-love-affair-continues-(1)

    I was thinking that 'the love affair continues' was a bit OTT, but now I see it is Dimi's own words. So that's OK then.

    Love the crossed hammers at the end.


    ;biggrin

    ;lol 'Ginger' [with reference to James Collins] in English rather than the French for 'ginger' which is roux.

    ;carew
  • 90 grand a week when he's 34. Football really has become a joke in many ways.
  • horsham

    But we don't know it is £90k a week, do we?
  • Mail claim it's £68,000 with a load of appearance and performance related bonuses, plus a signing on fee.
  • I can't find anywhere in the article evidence that the love affair continues are his words.. Maybe I blacked out in the middle of reading it, but I think this is the sub-editor's line
  • edited February 2016
    It's in the video, swiss ;ok
  • aaaaaaah soooooooo (obviously I knew that, er, just checking that everyone's up to scratch, er, bye ;yercoat
  • I can't think of any benefit to anyone involved in these deals who would willingly tell a member of the press what the financial arrangements were.
  • £68k a week basic.....

    (Which was behind both Moses and Song on 70k a week each and AC on £85k)

    £25k a week appearance only if he plays.
    £18k a week for the first year as his signing bonus of £1m split into installments.

    Kouyate is on £38k.....

    Don't ask for a link, just trust me ;cool

  • Don't ask for a link, just trust me ;cool

  • I don't think the club has done right thing and it isn't anything out of the ordinary. It seems lots of clubs are trying to tie down their big players to new contracts when they're in good form. Didn't we do it with Sakho last season?

    Whether 68k or 90k, I don't think that makes him our highest paid player, does it?

    And the age thing is irrelevant. Its unlikely he won't be sold before the end of his contract. If he does stay with us for several years then when he starts to decline he'll probably get offers from places like MLS where he'll still be able to entertain.
  • I can't think of any benefit to anyone involved in these deals who would willingly tell a member of the press what the financial arrangements were.

    Apart from Payet's camp.

  • Don't ask for a link, just trust me ;cool

    ;lol
  • Luke, it could be advantageous to them, but also not - if they want to get him a bigger contract later on (China, MLS etc) their negotiating position will be weaker, surely? It is in their interests to leave a shadow of doubt so they can inflate the figure any potential new club would have to pay?
  • I don't think the club has done right thing and it isn't anything out of the ordinary. It seems lots of clubs are trying to tie down their big players to new contracts when they're in good form. Didn't we do it with Sakho last season?

    Whether 68k or 90k, I don't think that makes him our highest paid player, does it?

    It probably does, now with the £68k a week (that never changed) and the £18k a week signing bonus.

    Whether he plays or not.

    When he plays, he's clearly our top earner.

    And there ladies and gentlemen is your £100k a week footballer that Sully promised. Just a few years late.
  • Sadly only the Daves or Payets agent knows what the real deal is and we are left to speculate. The original news story stated his current wage was 65k plus 10k appearance and if that was the case I say that is enough as I would imagine he would already be the top earner with possible exception of Carroll and loaned palyers. Were he on 35k a week I would have no problem with upping him to the 65k rate. If they have gone to 90k per week they are not the businessmen I took them for sadly. Too early into his current contract and it will now mean every other players agent is on the phone. Kouyate just went up in price, as will probably a few others. But as already mentioned unless we get the info with regard what he was and is now on it's hard to feel it a good or bad thing.

    I must say a friend of mine who I was discussing this with made a good point in just saying what do you care what he is paid, if it means he remains at the club that's all you want so don't worry about the details. I guess he is right but another part of you just hates this player (agent) power taking your club for a ride.
  • Did I miss this? Hahahaha

  • C&B.

    It's quite common for contracts to be revisited early, Deli Alli has just signed a new one in January. West Ham now realise his value to the club, and the likelihood we will build the team around him, so it makes good business sense imo.

    We always have the option to sell him on at, what is reported, a huge profit.
    I don't see anyone being taken for a ride.

  • But I think with our policy we seem to get players from abroad on low wages. I remember Sakho was rumoured to be on only £15,000 a week, so got a wage rise when he was banging in goals. Same with Kouyate. He's rumoured to be on around £15,000 a week too so we are now in talks with him over a new deal. Our highest paid players seem to be those from English leagues.

    This makes perfect sense, that's what they're worth at the time and the risk of adjusting to a new league will be factored in. If they do the business, thats great and they totally deserve the bumped up contract.

    If I recall correctly we signed Sakho and Valencia in the same window, the former cost less than half of the latter therefore implying a lower expectation and therefore wage. He has delivered more than Valencia when fit (I like Valencia and not having a dig) and based of performance deserves the contract hike.

    I suppose the alternative is to splash the cash on signing fees and wages for know entities but as w have seen with the big clubs that doesn't necessarily work out either (not that we have the resources to take this approach anyway).
  • I think Payet proved today against Blackburn that he is worth every penny if his new contract. I love West Ham with him in the side.
  • Looks like the Gaffa agrees with you.

    image
  • http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/france-boss-didier-deschamps-embarrassed-7416732

    So Didier Deschaps has been following a player who plays for Senegal? ;hmm

    Wonder if that explains Payet's non call-up.... Didier thinks he's pledged for Uruguay.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/gus-poyets-son-diego-opts-5203317

Sign In or Register to comment.