West Ham v Crystal Palace - Saturday 18 January @ 3pm

13567

Comments

  • chicagohammerchicagohammer
    Well that was pretty blah, 45 mins of my life that I will not get back, would like to see Soler come on and at least try and push them back a bit.

    To be fair, Palace have not created anything either and we have restricted them to a couple of long range efforts,

    A poor game overall with nothing to offer - highlights are going to be hard to come by
  • EXETERHAMMEREXETERHAMMER
    edited January 18
    Dull. Need to be more positive. Soler neds to come on for Alvarez who is a sending off waiting to happen.
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    chicagohammer said:

    A poor game overall with nothing to offer - highlights are going to be hard to come by

    No complaints (for a change) if we're last on MOTD tonight.

  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Soler on for Rodriguez.
  • alderzalderz
    Glad he’s on, but worried about Alvarez on a yellow
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Mavropanos in the book.
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Oh well.
  • stevesteve
    And they score
  • MIAHammerMIAHammer
    big surprise
  • thornburyironthornburyiron
    Our usual sleepwalk at the start of the second half.
  • alderzalderz
    That was way too easy
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Not great defending by Kilman, but that was close enough to Fabianski that he has to do better.
  • chicagohammerchicagohammer
    Killman might as well have not been there, he was goal side so why did he gave him so much time and space
  • stevesteve
    Potter out ,..To soon =)
  • jay_in_cptjay_in_cpt
    Kilman should have done better, like try and tackle the player..Oh well....
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    buffybegood said:

    Not great defending by Kilman, but that was close enough to Fabianski that he has to do better.

    Unsighted, apparently. ( My stream dropped out, so can only go by the BBC report)
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Orford and Ings being readied.
  • MIAHammerMIAHammer
    alderz said:

    Glad he’s on, but worried about Alvarez on a yellow

    I was surprised that Soler didnt come on for him.
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    Scarles coming on as well as Ings and Orford, off go Emerson, Cresswell and Paqueta
  • alderzalderz
    I’m a bit surprised Paqueta’s coming off, but fair enough.
  • chicagohammerchicagohammer
    Interesting subs - Potter is changing things up am sorry to see Cresswell go off as he was my MOTM thus far - hopefully will see a more positive approach to the game

    COYI
  • stevesteve
    Don't get Paqueta coming off .As we need a spark just takes a moment from him
  • jay_in_cptjay_in_cpt
    alderz said:

    I’m a bit surprised Paqueta’s coming off, but fair enough.

    My comms said he took a knock in warm up to 2nd half.....
  • MIAHammerMIAHammer
    Keeping Alvarez on is just tempting fate.
  • alderzalderz
    jay_in_cpt said:

    alderz said:

    I’m a bit surprised Paqueta’s coming off, but fair enough.

    My comms said he took a knock in warm up to 2nd half.....
    Yeah mine said that after he went off too, which I guess explains that
  • chicagohammerchicagohammer
    Very tidy by Scarles in the corner there
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    Re Paqueta, my comms said it was in the original warm up, but he was deemed ok to start.
  • BubblesNeverDiesBubblesNeverDies
    I wonder if Potter would have splashed out on Kilman who imo is totally underwhelming.
  • jay_in_cptjay_in_cpt
    edited January 18
    AWB has not been his usual self today IMO.....Don't think Henderson has touched the ball in the 2nd half...
  • alderzalderz
    BubblesNeverDies said:

    I wonder if Potter would have splashed out on Kilman who imo is totally underwhelming.

    I like Kilman, and I think he looks good a lot of the time. The problem for me is that we ask an awful lot of our defence with how much we give the ball away. Our midfield has been very porous since Rice left.
Sign In or Register to comment.