Couldn't Think - from January 2024

11516171820

Comments

  • we'd be supporting FC JamΓ³n del Oeste Unido

    I already do πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚

  • Bet they would know how to Tiki Taka
  • I’m sure Ravel Morrison has appeared for them at some point
  • I see on the OS that West Ham have partnered with a UAE property development company who are promoting properties for sale in Lebanon, no mention of being bombed by the Israelis.
  • This kind of thing always raises my hackles: "shares a commitment to family values"
  • Marcus Rashford starts as lone striker/centre forward for the first time in the Premier League this season and scores after 2 minutes

    Admittedly it’s against Ipswich but when Ten Hag played him there against Barnsley in the Caribou he scored twice

    Other than that Man U look awful
  • No "other matches' thread so I'll tag on under aslefs contribution...

    I can scarcely ever remembering Spurs being a pleasure to watch, but they were yesterday! So loving this run of Man City defeats!!

    A little bit jealous of the way the likes of Brighton, Bournemouth and Fulham play. The games yesterday were also great to watch and Wolves have come alive! Wouldn't mind Cunha in our squad.

    Lastly, mmmm LIverpool with points in hand. Even a loss to City will not be too disastrous but a win would be 11 points and no City title this year!!!!
  • And no Klopp either =)
  • steve said:

    And no Klopp either =)

    Although I'm not thrilled by the prospect of Liverpool winning the title, it's much easier to swallow now that Klopp has gone.
  • Not the same for me that he's not there. Maybe they wouldn't have won it again with Klopp anyway?
  • edited November 2024
    I've just posted on the J Lo thread, but although the post is in the thread, the front page says the last post in the thread is on 13th November, and the thread isn't near the top. Odd.
  • it had been sunk.

    I've unsunk it now.
  • edited November 2024
    MrsGrey said:

    it had been sunk.

    I've unsunk it now.

    I've no idea what that means, but thanks πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚.

    Edit: Nothing has changed for me, it's still showing 13th November and down the page.
  • MrsGrey said:

    it had been sunk.

    I've unsunk it now.

    I've no idea what that means, but thanks πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚.

    Edit: Nothing has changed for me, it's still showing 13th November and down the page.
    Ah, it needed to be bumped?
  • Sinking turns off bumping.

    My post was the first after I turned the sink function off and bumping came back into operation.

    Not sure why/when it was sunk - might have been in error. ( It's a mod function)
  • This is all Double Ten Hag to me... hope it all works out πŸ˜‰
  • Had to share this from over on KUMB. Someone made a comment about how a large proportion of fans think they can do a better job than the manager (not our specific manager, but just generally). Both these 2 posts made me laugh:
    Snowman said:

    There was a survey not too long ago that found that more than 5% of British men thought that they would win a fight with a gorilla.

    I reckon I could take out Damon Albarn in a fist fight πŸ˜‰

  • I ain't happy, I'm feeling glad
    I got sunshine in a bag
    I'm useless, but not for long
    The future is coming on 🎢
  • Happy Thanksgiving to our American Hammers πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰
  • So Portsmouth v Millwall postponed after the scheduled kick off time due to a power failure at Fratton Park.

    I wonder if the Millwall fans were singing "No one lights us, we don't care" ? =)
  • Happy Thanksgiving to our American Hammers πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰

    Thank you! Gobble gobble.
  • Many thanks and good wishes to all - and for the record, although I initially thought it weird, I am now a total advocate for green bean casserole with our thanksgiving dinner - look it up :-)
  • I did.

    That's awful.

    You've been away too long.
  • MrsGrey said:

    I did.

    That's awful.

    You've been away too long.

    Nah, it’s actually quite good. Goes well with turkey and roast spuds.
  • MrsGrey said:

    I did.

    That's awful.

    You've been away too long.

    Time to change your username chicago?
  • 2034 World Cup going to Saudi. Quel surprise. I won’t be around to see it though.
  • edited December 2024
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq8q2wwq271o

    Ipswich captain opts not to show support for the Rainbow Laces, citing religious beliefs.

    That's fine, but imo the club should not have him as captain when his values and beliefs (whatever their basis) are discriminatory, and contradict the stated aim of the club of "promoting equality and acceptance". How can they justify making someone the official club representative who in his words and actions is against that club aim?
  • edited December 2024
    πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»Perhaps he should have been β€œ not selected β€œ for these games.
    He can then have his religious beliefs and keep them to himself.
    At the end of the day he’s playing in a country that thank god has equality and is proud of it 🌈🌈🌈🌈
  • As an athiest I'm not often an advocate for religious beliefs, but I can see both sides of this and it's definitely a very tough one imo. He may well be OK with accepting the LBGTQ+ community whenever he comes into contact with someone who is part of it, but that doesn't mean he should have to actively promote it. I'm all for live and let live (Liverpool, Arsenal, Spurs and Man Utd excepted πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚), but that doesn't mean I'm going to go on a Pride march.

    Is forcing someone to go against their religious beliefs a policy of "promoting equality and acceptance"? Yes, I get that his beliefs may be viewed as discriminatory, but Islam is hardly a minor religion; should we ban it because we don't agree with it? There's a huge can of worms here, so I'll say no more, I just wanted to put out there that there are two sides to this and it's not the first time such a situation has arisen.

    As I say, it's a really, really tough situation. Maybe a different player should have been captain for the day.
  • I agree he shouldn't be forced to actively promote it. Although, the rainbow laces and similar gestures isn't actively promoting it, anyway. It's saying that they won't actively discriminate against it, surely.

    On another point, nobody is talking about banning Islam. Although I notice that other practising Muslims did participate in this event... Much like Christianity, I expect there's more than one interpretation of what a religion prohibits/requires. He's chosen to follow one of the paths.

    I think he is entirely within his rights to decline to participate. And it would be wrong to compel him to.

    But the club is being hypocritical, imo, making public declarations that LGBTQ+ are welcome, while giving the armband to someone who won't endorse that message.
Sign In or Register to comment.