Hmm. Anderson is getting a bit of tap here. I think we may be seeing the end of his test career. Hasn't been anywhere near the Anderson of old this series.
What on earth happened there? Stokes took a great catch and then "dropped" it as he tried to throw it up in celebration, and then England review it after it was given not out. Huge let off for Smith, he really shoulda been gone.
What on earth happened there? Stokes took a great catch and then "dropped" it as he tried to throw it up in celebration, and then England review it after it was given not out. Huge let off for Smith, he really shoulda been gone.
That could be the game and the series. I've never really understood the throwing up of the ball. Why add risk into things, particularly with the controversies in this series already.
That Smith "drop" is huge imo, I felt we needed to aim for 4 wickets by lunch, 3 isn't bad, but I wonder if it'll be enough given there's some weather about as well.
Really not sure why England reviewed that catch, it seems a complete waste of a review as Stokes's body language was that he'd dropped it.
That Smith "drop" is huge imo, I felt we needed to aim for 4 wickets by lunch, 3 isn't bad, but I wonder if it'll be enough given there's some weather about as well.
Really not sure why England reviewed that catch, it seems a complete waste of a review as Stokes's body language was that he'd dropped it.
I assumed it was for the lbw in case it was pad first. If it was just for the catch, it was wasted because, as you say, it was obviously not a clean catch.
Comments
That Smith "drop" is huge imo, I felt we needed to aim for 4 wickets by lunch, 3 isn't bad, but I wonder if it'll be enough given there's some weather about as well.
Really not sure why England reviewed that catch, it seems a complete waste of a review as Stokes's body language was that he'd dropped it.
Fancy them to do that between Smith, Head, Marsh, Carey and Cummings.
Decent take by Bairstow to get rid of Marsh.
It's all on Carey and Hazelwood, 55 needed.