But that's like saying I know as much as a retired Doctor as I'm an average patient.
An ex player has no massive knowledge of manaagement. Yes, in his career he will be in the environmenr and see how some managers work. I obviously agree with that. However, peoples opinions of Moyes's lack of flexibility and inability to mix things up whether during or prior to a game is basically whats been called into question. If we stay up doing the same things then it'll be luck that keeps us up
Playing at a certain level doesnt guarantee you know anything about managing a club! Lots of terrific players have been poor managers and plentyof people who played at no sort of level have become great managers!
I like Marlene and he's entitled to his opinion of course. I just happen to not agree with it. I also think that just because he's an ex pro, his opinion doesn't carry any more weight than your average fan in the street
Must admit I am surprised that Southampton do not figure as going down in any of those metrics - to my untrained eye, they are a slam dunk for one of the places up for grabs
As nice as alderz's tables above are nice, as we don't get relegated in any of them, and especially nice for Ham as Palace go down in 2 of the 3, the 9 teams involved have arguably very different degrees of difficulty in their remaining fixtures. I get that any team can beat any team blah blah blah, but if our survival depended on it I'd rather be playing the likes of Bournemouth or Soton than City or Arsenal (if they were still fighting for the title).
Palace, even if they don't go down, could play a huge role is determining who does, as they've got to play each of the other 8 clubs below Villa before the end of the season. Forest, Everton and Soton only play 4 of the other 8, so you'd feel they have tougher run-ins than most, and certainly tougher than Palace imo.
As nice as alderz's tables above are nice, as we don't get relegated in any of them, and especially nice for Ham as Palace go down in 2 of the 3, the 9 teams involved have arguably very different degrees of difficulty in their remaining fixtures. I get that any team can beat any team blah blah blah, but if our survival depended on it I'd rather be playing the likes of Bournemouth or Soton than City or Arsenal (if they were still fighting for the title).
Palace, even if they don't go down, could play a huge role is determining who does, as they've got to play each of the other 8 clubs below Villa before the end of the season. Forest, Everton and Soton only play 4 of the other 8, so you'd feel they have tougher run-ins than most, and certainly tougher than Palace imo.
Yeah, I think there’s just not a way to factor in difficulty of fixtures. I thought about looking at the equivalent results from last year, but we were good then so it felt like a trick!
Until we’re safe there’s always a chance we go down, but I think the point I was trying to make is that, whilst we aren’t in great form, we aren’t from the worst in the league in from, and we aren’t the only ones feeling worried about form.
Yeah, tough to look at last season's results, especially as all 3 promoted teams are in the bottom 9 so I don't see how you could do any sort of comparison that includes them. It is quite remarkable than Palace face all the other 8 teams in the space of just their last 11 games.
Fulham could also have a big say in who goes down, they've got to play 7 of the bottom 9, and both Arsenal and Newcastle play 6.
Not sure I agree with all of it, especially when he's looked at how Paqueta is used. Yes, he looked good in forward positions against Forest, but we won 4-0 so most players looked good. The comparison is the match against Wolves in January, where he played in a 2 with Rice, the suggestion being that Moyes has "finally" decided to play Paqueta as a 10, whereas he spent most of the start of the season playing there with Rice and Soucek behind him and he was hardly shining there then tbh.
One of the things highlighted is how poor our actuals are compared to our xG, especially as we exceeded our xG last season. I know it's all about the actual goals scored, but we're nearly 11 goals below our xG this season, 24 PL goals scored against an xG of 34.87 for the season so far (stats from Sofascore) and have also conceded nearly 2 goals more than our xG against, 34 against 32.07; we've only exceded our xG 6 times in 26 matches.
According to my calculations (take that for what it is 😂🤣😂), if we look at solely the xG in each match, so the higher xG wins, we'd have 46 points so far, and if we round the xG for each side up or down to the nearest goal, we'd still have 33 points. So maybe, just maybe, some of our criticism against Moyes is a little misplaced, and we've got to look at what the players are doing once they cross the white line.
I know the manager has to accept some or even a lot of responsibility for how the players perform once they're on the pitch (in terms of improving players, ensuring their mental state and confidence is good, etc), but there's absolutely no doubt that the players themselves have hugely underperformed on the pitch this season, especially when it comes to putting the ball in the net, which, after all, is largely what the game is about.
I hope that whatever the result on Saturday, I would not want to see DM sacked, history when written will highlight the unwillingness of the board to act when they should, and the willingness to act when they shouldn’t,
If we lose on Saturday, the game is well and truly afoot and changing managers at such a crucial time can only be further disruptive,
Comments
Do we then get Carrick in to do our statting?
Palace, even if they don't go down, could play a huge role is determining who does, as they've got to play each of the other 8 clubs below Villa before the end of the season. Forest, Everton and Soton only play 4 of the other 8, so you'd feel they have tougher run-ins than most, and certainly tougher than Palace imo.
Until we’re safe there’s always a chance we go down, but I think the point I was trying to make is that, whilst we aren’t in great form, we aren’t from the worst in the league in from, and we aren’t the only ones feeling worried about form.
Fulham could also have a big say in who goes down, they've got to play 7 of the bottom 9, and both Arsenal and Newcastle play 6.
Paddy Vieira sacked
https://theanalyst.com/eu/2023/03/can-david-moyes-find-the-formula-to-keep-west-ham-in-the-premier-league/
Not sure I agree with all of it, especially when he's looked at how Paqueta is used. Yes, he looked good in forward positions against Forest, but we won 4-0 so most players looked good. The comparison is the match against Wolves in January, where he played in a 2 with Rice, the suggestion being that Moyes has "finally" decided to play Paqueta as a 10, whereas he spent most of the start of the season playing there with Rice and Soucek behind him and he was hardly shining there then tbh.
One of the things highlighted is how poor our actuals are compared to our xG, especially as we exceeded our xG last season. I know it's all about the actual goals scored, but we're nearly 11 goals below our xG this season, 24 PL goals scored against an xG of 34.87 for the season so far (stats from Sofascore) and have also conceded nearly 2 goals more than our xG against, 34 against 32.07; we've only exceded our xG 6 times in 26 matches.
According to my calculations (take that for what it is 😂🤣😂), if we look at solely the xG in each match, so the higher xG wins, we'd have 46 points so far, and if we round the xG for each side up or down to the nearest goal, we'd still have 33 points. So maybe, just maybe, some of our criticism against Moyes is a little misplaced, and we've got to look at what the players are doing once they cross the white line.
I know the manager has to accept some or even a lot of responsibility for how the players perform once they're on the pitch (in terms of improving players, ensuring their mental state and confidence is good, etc), but there's absolutely no doubt that the players themselves have hugely underperformed on the pitch this season, especially when it comes to putting the ball in the net, which, after all, is largely what the game is about.
I don't know what this forum is coming to!
If we lose on Saturday, the game is well and truly afoot and changing managers at such a crucial time can only be further disruptive,
IMO