I do not think we have used Chicha properly, IMO he is simply not a lone striker but is clearly one who benefits from feeding off a strong presence alongside him.
I always wanted to see more of him up top with Arnie or AC but rarely did it happen, alongside Antonio would be interesting, Antonio may be less known for the killer pass but he powers forward and draws defenders towards him - space is therefore created with many second ball/rebound opportunities that Chica would pounce upon.
Nope. Not having it. Why would we give up the No7 and No9 shirts if we were going to sign a transfer-record breaking striker? Makes absolutely no sense to me.
I think you’re reading too much into shirt numbers. People care too much about them these days.
Plus, if a number isn’t available when they join, it isn’t available and that’s it. I don’t think a player is going to decide not to join because they can’t wear the number 9.
Me and Grey were just 'aving a chat with our :redwine: and :beer: outside, and remarking that we'll almost certainly sign a striker we've never heard of any day now. Citing Fornals (who?), and Anderson (who?) ...
Comments
I always wanted to see more of him up top with Arnie or AC but rarely did it happen, alongside Antonio would be interesting, Antonio may be less known for the killer pass but he powers forward and draws defenders towards him - space is therefore created with many second ball/rebound opportunities that Chica would pounce upon.
Chicago In
Plus, if a number isn’t available when they join, it isn’t available and that’s it. I don’t think a player is going to decide not to join because they can’t wear the number 9.
Gomez a smokescreen all along?
What a fool I am
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/11760638/maxi-gomez-still-interesting-west-ham-despite-deal-appearing-to-be-off
It’s genuinely laughable.
gotta fill those column inches #anynewswilldo #makeitupifyouhaveto
# I should be so Lucci....