Other things the Tories had in their manifesto but dropped: a free vote on fox hunting, the 'dementia tax', extending fracking, cutting winter fuel payment, cutting free school meals.
Either these are equally dreadful betrayals, and worthy of as much outrage and criticism as the 'Brexit betrayal' ...
or, they are further examples of how policies and promises made at one point in time are changed to reflect changing circumstances, experience, knowledge or political realities.
@eucopresident 5h5 hours ago More Appeal to EP: You should be open to a long extension, if the UK wishes to rethink its strategy. 6 million people signed the petition, 1 million marched. They may not feel sufficiently represented by UK Parliament but they must feel represented by you. Because they are Europeans.
I can see that argument Cuz, and no doubt there's plenty of support for it.
From my point of view, now we can see what Brexit actually means and have a much clearer idea of what the consequences are, I would argue that 'will of the people' may have changed significantly enough to warrant another vote.
And if the 'will of the people' remains the same, then fair enough, but I expect there are more people who have changed their minds from leave to remain since 2016 than the other way around.
If Leavers are convinced that their view is held by a majority, a 2nd referendum should hold no fears.
If they are worried that a 2nd vote would not result in a majority for Leave, then they should probably stop suggesting it is the 'will of the people'.
Scare mongering tactics would suit any argument we should leave and then watch others follow, same happened with the banks the unions and everything else, we don’t need another vote we’ve already had one
I think if there were another vote it would be different because the leavers probably wouldn’t bother because they been there before and nothing happened I’d certainly never vote again on anything because my vote means so little
If Leavers are convinced that their view is held by a majority, a 2nd referendum should hold no fears.
If they are worried that a 2nd vote would not result in a majority for Leave, then they should probably stop suggesting it is the 'will of the people'.
And it was held by a majority that’s how they voted
I would have more respect for a call for a second vote if 1: it wasn`t called "the peoples vote" and 2: you don`t win a game "one all" and 3: what if Leave wins?
OCS. We don`t have a clearer view of what Brexit looks like, or its consequences. If we do ever leave then I think 10 to 15 years would give a reasonable indication of how we are performing. I would even support a vote to re-enter the EU if it came to it. I also think it fair, that if we do leave, then Scotland should be given another go at independence. If successful then Scotland could apply for membership of the EU. There seems strong support in Scotland for this, given SNP electoral success and their Brexit vote.
I`m still hoping that MP`s revoke article 50, I think that would be most entertaining.
Latest from the houses of parliament. Indicative voting papers will be green, not pink, disappointing. And Bercow will not allow another meaningful vote on Mays deal.
Comments
We get to have a rethink and a new vote in an election.
The referendum was an oversimplified binary choice, so not comparable, IMO.
:doh:
Either these are equally dreadful betrayals, and worthy of as much outrage and criticism as the 'Brexit betrayal' ...
or, they are further examples of how policies and promises made at one point in time are changed to reflect changing circumstances, experience, knowledge or political realities.
Verified account
@eucopresident
5h5 hours ago
More
Appeal to EP: You should be open to a long extension, if the UK wishes to rethink its strategy. 6 million people signed the petition, 1 million marched. They may not feel sufficiently represented by UK Parliament but they must feel represented by you. Because they are Europeans.
From my point of view, now we can see what Brexit actually means and have a much clearer idea of what the consequences are, I would argue that 'will of the people' may have changed significantly enough to warrant another vote.
And if the 'will of the people' remains the same, then fair enough, but I expect there are more people who have changed their minds from leave to remain since 2016 than the other way around.
I feel exactly the same.
If Leavers are convinced that their view is held by a majority, a 2nd referendum should hold no fears.
If they are worried that a 2nd vote would not result in a majority for Leave, then they should probably stop suggesting it is the 'will of the people'.
By that logic we should honour the 1975 referendum and remain.
Problem solved :ok:
OCS. We don`t have a clearer view of what Brexit looks like, or its consequences. If we do ever leave then I think 10 to 15 years would give a reasonable indication of how we are performing. I would even support a vote to re-enter the EU if it came to it. I also think it fair, that if we do leave, then Scotland should be given another go at independence. If successful then Scotland could apply for membership of the EU. There seems strong support in Scotland for this, given SNP electoral success and their Brexit vote.
I`m still hoping that MP`s revoke article 50, I think that would be most entertaining.
The rhetoric of Brexit has changed so much in those three years that it feels a lot different to what was being mooted back in 2016.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35616946
Thankyou for your concern.
I don’t know if that really has anything to do with this discussion but I’m still bitter about it :sub:
Or, and this is just an idea, he has actually read the procedural rules, and has made a ruling based on them?
I don't think Labour will ever win a GE with JC as leader.
Although I find this chaos quite refreshing. Revoke article 50. Stop Brexit.