The 'Couldn't think where to put this' thread part 2 or 'does my comment merit a NEW THREAD?'

1363739414266

Comments

  • Cuz1 said:

    Thomas repka sentenced to 15 months for fraud where did it all go wrong

    He got caught....................
  • That must have been some game at Villa at home to the Blunts last night.
    After 82 minutes, the Blunts are leading 0-3, the game ends up a draw.
    I wonder who they'll blame. ;lol
  • Please don't be mean to me for saying this, as I'm certain it won't be a popular opinion, BUT, Neil Warnock has handled the Sala situation really well, and deserves a bit of a ;clap for the last few weeks.
  • To be fair alderz he’s come across dignified during this terrible time so have to agree, it’s a life we are talking about and that imo is more important
  • Oxford playing centre back for fc Augsburg today against weirder Bremen
  • 3-0 down after 28 mins
  • https://www.football365.com/news/the-future-of-premier-league-football-on-tv-part-two

    Some interesting points on future of football on tv. I was out with my mate who works as a sport journalist and he reckons Sky will be in trouble in a few years as their model for football isn't working anymore.
  • Suze: yes, being transported by motorbike. Not even a HANDbag...
    Madcap : that's what I thought, but she turned into a Pinscher, according to a German guest who seemed to know his dogs. Full of character, thought of calling her Noblette...
  • PLF, thanks for sharing, am certainly interested in next weeks edition where possible solutions and alternative services are discussed

    ;ok
  • If you follow cricket, this is very funny, especially the last few lines.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p06z6x5p
    ;lol
  • Antonio's views on racist abuse at games: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47208847

    Well articulated, and I agree ;clap
  • I bet he wouldn’t be happy if ours is the first stadium to be closed.
  • I bet he wouldn’t be happy if ours is the first stadium to be closed.

    But it will always be some team's stadium that gets closed. It has to start somewhere and I fully expect him to be annoyed at the time but it it helps eradicate racism (and homophobia) in stadiums then it will have been a good thing.
  • alderz said:

    Antonio's views on racist abuse at games: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47208847

    Well articulated, and I agree ;clap

    The problem with this is the ability for it to be abused. For instance, what is stopping a group of people who don't support the club intentionally getting tickets with the sole purpose of shouting racist abuse to get the club docked points or to get the playing behind closed doors.
    There are probably lots of teams you can get tickets on general sale for.
  • edited February 2019
    A points deduction is never the way to go; makes no sense

    What they do at the moment is sufficient, life bans from football & hand over evidence to the police for possible criminal charges

    And the need to continue education on this sort of thing at school level and beyond
  • I don't think enough is being done Luke. Because what is being done (and has been being done for decades) isn't working.

    The few cases we have read about just recently (Salah, the banana skin one, Sterling) are just the tip of the iceberg: look at those quoted figures for people who say they see/hear incidents like this all the time. Very few of them get reported (I mean by ordinary folks, reported to the stewards or police) so nothing gets done about them.

    The punishment of this tiny minority is having no effect on the much bigger minority who just carry on as before.

    I think it's clear that existing strategies are useless. The stakes have to be raised.
  • Moojor said:



    The problem with this is the ability for it to be abused.

    It may perhaps be the case (although I can't quite see the benefit to an individual getting another club into trouble - he'll still be subject to a banning order himself, so will lose out personally).

    But even if it that scenario does happen, as long as there's a thorough investigation to identify the offender and his background, it will quickly become apparent that he's not a 'real' fan. And the punishments can be meted out appropriately.

    I don't think your hypothetical scenario is sufficient to block implementing additional measures.
  • MrsGrey said:

    Moojor said:



    The problem with this is the ability for it to be abused.

    It may perhaps be the case (although I can't quite see the benefit to an individual getting another club into trouble - he'll still be subject to a banning order himself, so will lose out personally).

    But even if it that scenario does happen, as long as there's a thorough investigation to identify the offender and his background, it will quickly become apparent that he's not a 'real' fan. And the punishments can be meted out appropriately.

    I don't think your hypothetical scenario is sufficient to block implementing additional measures.
    For instance, millwall fans get West tickets on general sale. Get club in trouble, don't care about being banned from West ham games for life.

    I totally agree additional measures are needed but unless it came with assurances that there would be proper investigations before deductions, i wouldn't trust it.
  • edited February 2019
    I'd have a ban from all football, not just the ground they offend at. Can't see why that's not the norm now tbh.
  • Totally agree with that. That is also a change which doesn't require any extra work and they could implement straight away.
  • ;ok They should put us in charge ;biggrin
  • No running!
  • Lukerz said:

    A points deduction is never the way to go; makes no sense

    What they do at the moment is sufficient, life bans from football & hand over evidence to the police for possible criminal charges

    And the need to continue education on this sort of thing at school level and beyond

    It can be incremental but there needs to be more than what's in place now. Put more at stake and others in the crowd will be quicker to turn on the abusers.

    There's been plenty of education in this country about the holocaust. You still get groups of supporters hissing when we play Tottenham.
  • edited February 2019
    My point is that things like points deductions &, to a degree, bans (although I agree with the latter, it has to be a life ban from all football stadia), do not eradicate the issue because the issue here cannot be removed by deterrents. It isn't a simple "do this & you get your toy taken away", because this sort of attitude is ingrained into the psyche of some of these 'idiots' who still feel it is a good idea & acceptable to hurl abuse at players/managers/other fans, whether racist, homophobic or otherwise derogatory.

    I completely understand the message Antonio is trying to get across (we need to get radical & impose the strongest possible punishment), but to deduct points from a club due to a number of people who hold an attitude that will simply not change overnight is a pointless act, because their attitudes won't change as a result & therefore it won't stop. You can say that the threat of punishments like these may result in others around them turning on them but, again, that is also not what we need because it could result in ground violence, which is another matter entirely.

    So what can be done, realistically? I completely agree with CCTV & pinpointing those responsible. They then need to be banned from any sporting event (football grounds at a minimum) for life. Then there needs to be an avenue to begin criminal proceedings against them which has to involve some sort of rehabilitation/educational programme. I would argue that even those programmes can have limited effects if it is an intrinsic, almost animalistic instinct to behave in that way; you could argue a psychiatrist is a better route to go down for all of them. Is that realistic?

    There possibly needs to be greater education & emphasis on a 'whistleblowing' culture in the stadium, where it is acceptable to privately inform the stewards/police of potential criminal acts. One massive issue with this is that there is very much a tribal atmosphere in football which results in people who 'grass' (as they like to put it) being frowned upon. Again, this could lead to a scenario above where violence becomes an issue.

    This is beyond a crime & punishment issue, because it transcends football. It is not an issue only in a 30,000 seater stadium, but in society. The sort of person who hurls that sort of abuse has grown up into that sort of person who turns to those instincts, possibly in an emotional scenario, such as football.

    And to add, how bad has it got where we are talking about a "your club will lose points if you shout racist abuse" punishment in order to get people to refrain from hurling that disgusting abuse?

    It is a massive problem & more does need to be done; but the fact we are still having these issues in 2019 says to me that implementing the right thing is proving very difficult for those in authority.
  • It is a massive problem, but part of the issue with racist / homophobic / abusive rhetoric is that it seems in the past few years it has become slowly more socially 'acceptable' to hold those views. Yes, deducting points from clubs won't solve the issue and it won't stop the types of people who would scream that sort of stuff thinking the things they think, but the less visible it is the less ability it has to spreads as an acceptable viewpoint. If football fans police one another because they are scared of their team losing points, then it will quickly disappear from football stadiums, imo.
  • edited February 2019
    Thing is Luke, if it were simply a question of education, people would have got it by now. It is, regrettably, an attitude somehow ingrained in a section of society.

    I don't think that radical actions following incidents at football grounds will change how those people think, but it might change how they behave, and it will certainly change the attitude of those in the crowd around them.

    The incident at our club came to light because a fan recorded it, and made it public. Perhaps if more people in the crowd took exception to racist abuse, and stewards acted promptly, that might help.

    I fully understand Antonio's position: whatever the authorities have done so far, it isn't enough, as it hasn't stopped racist abuse from appearing at football grounds, so maybe something more radical is needed.

    Sections of football crowds seem to feel they are not bound by the norms of ordinary social behaviour.

    Here's a bloke doing his job:

    dimaria

    What other occupations would people feel it was OK to lob a beer bottle, and then a bottle of water at the person doing it? In most other circumstances you could expect to be arrested for assault.

    The bile and abuse he was subjected to from fans in that corner was shameful, but they all seemed to think they had a perfect right to behave like that.
  • Points deductions would lead down a very cautious road. You could get instances of non/rival-fans literally rolling up to a rivals stadium to just hurl abuse and get the home team deducted points which could have huge ramifications. A ban for life would do nothing in those circumstances if they didn't even support the team to begin with.
  • Yeold

    Which is why people have suggested that you would require further and careful investigation of such individuals, and that bans would be for all football games/stadiums.

    I think it is a clever thing that Antonio has done.

    He's suggested what could be done; if people don't think that is a good idea, then I'm sure he'd be interested in what else they would suggest, outside of what currently isn't working.
This discussion has been closed.