Well we should be, because I’ve already proved it, unless of course you’re saying that Facebook can’t count the number of members accepted into a group properly?
Apart from when I'm looking at it on Facebook right now, it says 9407 members.
12.8k members now. The club have made contact with the fan group and are having a meeting.
The average yield provides a benchmark for the price of attending football matches. It reflects all types of gate receipts including season tickets, match day tickets, membership fees (where tickets are part of that membership), premium ticketing and hospitality [income].
For a comparison, only Huddersfield offer cheaper adult STs than us, and that is only because they sold STs prior to confirming their promotion.
Match Day and ST prices have dropped below/well below the league average over the last 2 years.
Liverpool have been having the same problem 2,000 seats a match on average where people who have tickets don't turn up and I have seen plenty seats at man city aswell I think it's a growing problem in modern football
Sometimes as a ST holder you can’t go to games, this will only increases as kick off times and days change to accommodate TV companies. We can’t always find a mate / relative who wants our tickets and they are not always resold if we put them on ticket exchange.
Sometimes as a ST holder you can’t go to games, this will only increases as kick off times and days change to accommodate TV companies. We can’t always find a mate / relative who wants our tickets and they are not always resold if we put them on ticket exchange.
Of course you’re right Suze, trouble is we’ve got about 3-8,000 a game not putting their bottom on a seat, plus the ticket exchange is weighed so much in the clubs favour it doesn’t exactly encourage fans to bother putting their tickets on there, the current general climate with plenty of fans is imo
“what let them sell it for £30-£50 again while I’ll get a few quid, all for it not to end up in the transfer kitty, nah you’re alright”
the ticket exchange is weighed so much in the clubs favour it doesn’t exactly encourage fans to bother putting their tickets on there, the current general climate with plenty of fans is imo
“what let them sell it for £30-£50 again while I’ll get a few quid, all for it not to end up in the transfer kitty, nah you’re alright”
Seems like a very selfish, 'dog in the manger' attitude to me.
Not exactly getting a decent deal out of the ticket trader after spending money upfront, Then you have people who’ve questioned what it can be used for.
Perhaps people have become tired of some of the delays, system issues, half truths etc
They bought us when we were a shambles and in real danger of financial catastrophe.
Back then, if we'd had a guarantee eight years to the day of being a Premier League side with a few good players and a 60,000 seater stadium and a decent, experienced manager who gets players working hard for their shirt, I'd have bitten their arm and shoulder off as well as their hand.
In fact, not sure what fan wouldn't have taken that offer, considering how things were then.
I think £20m in interest between them, plus the value of their initial investment £50m increasing to what £300-400m value of the club now is not too shabby?
Yes we really do owe them something for the fact they took their hard earned out of 9-10% growth schemes and instead only took 7% back out of the club, truly truly grateful
I’d say they’ve had a result in the fact had the majority of the UP fans known even half of what they do now, back then, the move either wouldn’t of happened at worst or at best they would’ve had way more resistance to it.
I never like Terrence Brown for what he did walking away with more cash than he could carry and if I’m being consistent to myself then I’m treating these two the same. The interest piece has narked me big time from the time it was disclosed and nothing will change my mind on that.
If however they change that in the future in any way possible, they’d then get cut some slack from me, but until then, no not on the financials
Macca. I don't think 8 years ago they could have been confident of getting the Olympic Stadium, there were many hurdles to overcome. They had just sold Birmingham FC and the opportunity arose to buy West Ham, which they had wanted for a long time. I think they would have bought it even if it meant staying at the Boleyn.
To be honest they always imo knew there was a huge chance of getting the stadium back then, they done there research before they bought the club. Is was done out of a love for the club I'm sure but to also make money.
Day 1 Sully says they want it and want to rent it, now reading through the recent FOI request on Brady’s responses to the recent LS report ordered by The Mayor, WHU were “approached” by Newham regarding the stadium......
I don’t personally doubt that Dave’s have the clubs interests at heart or that they don’t want it to be successful, but the way they’ve gone about certain things doesn’t sit well with me.
They bought us when we were a shambles and in real danger of financial catastrophe.
Back then, if we'd had a guarantee eight years to the day of being a Premier League side with a few good players and a 60,000 seater stadium and a decent, experienced manager who gets players working hard for their shirt, I'd have bitten their arm and shoulder off as well as their hand.
In fact, not sure what fan wouldn't have taken that offer, considering how things were then.
8 years ago they were trying to save an unbalanced squad from relegation in the January transfer window. Doesn't sound like much as changed to me.
Comments
That's really not what the data reflects. For a comparison, only Huddersfield offer cheaper adult STs than us, and that is only because they sold STs prior to confirming their promotion.
Match Day and ST prices have dropped below/well below the league average over the last 2 years.
Do you suppose, like last season, they will be pressuring fans to renew early, before they know what league they will be in?
Think they are one of the favourites for the drop especially if they lose to Stoke at the weekend, they will be only be a point above stoke
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42715295
We are dining at the same table as some big names courtesy of the uk tax payer, lest it be forgotten..
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/sep/28/football-clubs-leagues-attendance-figures-arsenal-celtic-mls
http://www.claretandhugh.info/the-truth-about-west-hams-attendances/
Sunderland are in some serious do do....
;whistle
“what let them sell it for £30-£50 again while I’ll get a few quid, all for it not to end up in the transfer kitty, nah you’re alright”
Not exactly getting a decent deal out of the ticket trader after spending money upfront, Then you have people who’ve questioned what it can be used for.
Perhaps people have become tired of some of the delays, system issues, half truths etc
They’ve had a right result, if many knew then what they do now, it may not of been so comfortable for them
Back then, if we'd had a guarantee eight years to the day of being a Premier League side with a few good players and a 60,000 seater stadium and a decent, experienced manager who gets players working hard for their shirt, I'd have bitten their arm and shoulder off as well as their hand.
In fact, not sure what fan wouldn't have taken that offer, considering how things were then.
We clearly have differing ideas of the meaning of 'comfortable'.
Not sure what 'result' you think they've had.
Pretty sure if they were simply interested in making money, they could have found far more profitable homes for their hard-earned, with far less ag.
Yes we really do owe them something for the fact they took their hard earned out of 9-10% growth schemes and instead only took 7% back out of the club, truly truly grateful
I’d say they’ve had a result in the fact had the majority of the UP fans known even half of what they do now, back then, the move either wouldn’t of happened at worst or at best they would’ve had way more resistance to it.
I never like Terrence Brown for what he did walking away with more cash than he could carry and if I’m being consistent to myself then I’m treating these two the same. The interest piece has narked me big time from the time it was disclosed and nothing will change my mind on that.
If however they change that in the future in any way possible, they’d then get cut some slack from me, but until then, no not on the financials
;ok
I don’t personally doubt that Dave’s have the clubs interests at heart or that they don’t want it to be successful, but the way they’ve gone about certain things doesn’t sit well with me.