I’m happy for them to make money on their investment in the form of the clubs value.
Right now they bought for around £50m and they put in another £50m to cover the shortfall in relegation which they helped cause and to cover loans to the club, on the second £50m they’re charging interest originally at 7% and just recently 3.5%, that isn’t right in my book and no other PL club where the owners lend money appear to do it.
I’d of rather they took a salary than the £20m arched interest in 2020
Either way you look at it. In 8 years they've been here.. We're still trying to stay up, still in debt, only now we don't own a stadium. So pardon me if I'm not their biggest fans ;wink
Coming back to the story that they would have bought the stadium but for Levy and co. The question I would ask is HOW would they have funded it? Because right now the transfer pot seems stretched when they haven’t had to pay for a stadium. Would they have injected their own wealth into the stadium?
Because I can’t really lenders lending to an already debt saddled club to fund a stadium when the club itself frequently finds itself in the lower echelons of the Prem, with relegations thrown in every now and then... ;hmm
Coming back to the story that they would have bought the stadium but for Levy and co. The question I would ask is HOW would they have funded it? Because right now the transfer pot seems stretched when they haven’t had to pay for a stadium. Would they have injected their own wealth into the stadium?
Because I can’t really lenders lending to an already debt saddled club to fund a stadium when the club itself frequently finds itself in the lower echelons of the Prem, with relegations thrown in every now and then... ;hmm
This is a great point, they’ve barely been able to keep the club functioning without the use of payday and overdraft facilities.
How on earth were they going to find the coat of the stadium if they had bought it?
They’ve put money in only when they had to, and then they charged interest.
But 'owning' the stadium would make the club more valuable and even a more desirable proposition. By taking payday loans and overdrafts they have shown they are not afraid to borrow external money.
If we owned the stadium I am sure we would have a sponsor by now plus food money tours etc and I think our season tickets would have been more expensive and we might of had 66,000 seats aswell. But ifs all ifs and maybes as we don't own it.
Answered my own question, thanks to someone who knows about this stuff and the recent Moore report pages 55/56
The club wasn’t going to buy the stadium with the first bid process, they were going to lease it for 150 years a joint venture with us putting in £20m, Newham £40m and government grant of £35m as the costs to do the conversion were set at £95m (how wrong was that!)
We’d pay $100k a year rent (unless we finished higher than 10th then it went up) and we’d have to pay for all the running costs at the stadium but would get the naming rights and all the food/drink
So, we were never going to own it. It was just a different deal. One that I was more in favour with at the start because we controlled the stadium.
But 'owning' the stadium would make the club more valuable and even a more desirable proposition. By taking payday loans and overdrafts they have shown they are not afraid to borrow external money.
Well that’s one way of looking at it! It also means by not owning it they didn’t have to find or secure the money themselves, this way the value of the club goes up and they’ve put no more in
Interestingly regarding interest on loans it was reported during the week when writing about a possible Newcastle take over that even Mike Ashley doesn't charge interest on loans made to the club out of his own pocket, and to find a more maligned owner would be difficult. Apparently his loans total £129m and are all interest free.
Let's be honest, the Geordies hate Ashley enough already, if he charged interest on his loans they'd be crowds storming up Bigg Market with pitchforks and torches (in shirts, no jackets).
Comments
Right now they bought for around £50m and they put in another £50m to cover the shortfall in relegation which they helped cause and to cover loans to the club, on the second £50m they’re charging interest originally at 7% and just recently 3.5%, that isn’t right in my book and no other PL club where the owners lend money appear to do it.
I’d of rather they took a salary than the £20m arched interest in 2020
The value of the club is where they make their profit for me, not interest
So pardon me if I'm not their biggest fans ;wink
Somebody call...?
Because I can’t really lenders lending to an already debt saddled club to fund a stadium when the club itself frequently finds itself in the lower echelons of the Prem, with relegations thrown in every now and then... ;hmm
Justa ;hmm
How on earth were they going to find the coat of the stadium if they had bought it?
They’ve put money in only when they had to, and then they charged interest.
;jarvis
The club wasn’t going to buy the stadium with the first bid process, they were going to lease it for 150 years a joint venture with us putting in £20m, Newham £40m and government grant of £35m as the costs to do the conversion were set at £95m (how wrong was that!)
We’d pay $100k a year rent (unless we finished higher than 10th then it went up) and we’d have to pay for all the running costs at the stadium but would get the naming rights and all the food/drink
So, we were never going to own it. It was just a different deal. One that I was more in favour with at the start because we controlled the stadium.
When you can, walk, rice paper with,
Quarter tip, metal studded, boots on
Then you may eave
;bowdown
If he gets his £350m, he would be turning a profit of over £100m, so not too shabby.
Separately, he seems to have got his trotters in a lovely property deal that will ensure Newcastle can never increase the ground capacity:
https://www.themag.co.uk/2017/03/council-approve-mike-ashley-property-development-ends-hopes-expanding-st-james-park-newcastle-united/