If we weren't chasing such a big target, you'd be fairly pleased with England's 54-0 at the end of the powerplay, but it's 20 runs behind Australia's 74-2, albeit with losing 2 fewer wickets.
England football embarrassing, cricket embarrassing and our tennis players go out in the first round of tournaments embarrassing. Is there any sport we can hold our heads up.
Lost by 36 runs. In the lap of the gods now as to qualifying, the best we can do is big wins against Nambia and Oman and hope we better Scotland's net run rate.
Bearing in mind England must beat Namibia to have any chance of progressing, it's absolutely chucking it down 15 minutes before the scheduled start. There's an extra 90 minutes before any overs would be lost, and then the possibility of a reduced overs match, but that just increases the lottery aspect of the game. Not ideal.
Play got underway for an 11 overs a side match. England, after a slow start, reached 82-3 off 8 overs when it's started raining again. Even if play gets back underway, it's turned into a lottery as, if play does manage to get re-started, Namibia will likely just have a slogfest target.
Hmm, it's been reduced to 10 overs a side, but surely that means they should have an increased target as we're partway through our innings and suddenly we've got fewer balls to hit out at with plenty of wickets in hand? Doesn't sound as though that will be the case though.
Commentators seemed surprised that Namibia's target was revised, but revised (slightly) it has been. England made 122-5, but Namibia's revised target is 127 off 10 overs.
Comments
And now Bairstow is gone, 124-4.
England win the toss and have put Oman in, hoping to restrict them to a low total that they can knock off quickly.
The commentators said that if we took 3 overs it would only increase our net run rate to +0.3, but that doesn't seem right at all. Time will tell.
Edit: Commentators completely wrong, our net run rate up to +3.08.