The BMA have been studying over 9000 people since the 80s to study links between alcoholism and dementia. The findings suggest that people who do not drink alcohol between 35 and 55 are less likely of developing dementia that heavy drinkers (more than 14 units a week) but more likely than moderate drinkers (up to 14 units a week).
Trev will always be my favourite player (I just realized I have been in USA too long as 'favorite' now seems to look right ;doh )
He was one hell of a player but I love him as a man too. A great role model, really knowledgeable and if he's not a thoroughly decent guy, he does a great impression of one!!
Milwall, 2 up at half time, giving Boro a tough old time. 87th minute, Boro get one back, and equalise in the 97th minute. Nobody likes to see that........
A study into 'luck' in the 2017/18 season. It's really interesting (I think), and actually shows that, based on the metric, we were 1 point better off than we should have been with neutral luck.
I saw that, and had grave doubts about its 'science'.
The BBC have got into reporting this kind of thing, without in any way bringing a critical mindset to it. (This isn't just a dig at the BBC; Ben Goldacre's book 'Bad Science' shows just how slack journalists have become in reporting 'scientific studies.') They happily published a bunch of nonsense from a 'super-computer' that claimed to determine what the final points would be for teams in the relegation zone, which was way out.
A research team collaborated with ex-Premier League referee Peter Walton, analysing footage from every game of the 2017-18 Premier League season and watching for:
Goals that should have been disallowed Incorrectly disallowed goals Incorrectly awarded penalties (that were scored) Penalties that were not awarded but should have been Incorrect red-card decisions Red-card incidents that were missed
These can only subjective opinions. For me, the only way that would properly work would be to have the actual referee team that were at the game review the game. That way, at least there would be a consistency to the decisions.
Despite the claims that 'thousands of simulations were run' to determine how the game would have turned out taking these factors into account, there is simply no real way to know what might have happened.
Goals scored after injury time overran
This has nothing to do with luck whatsoever. Injury time as shown on the board is the minimum amount of time a referee is going to add, not a maximum.
Deflected goals
This is the biggest joke of the lot. Yes, deflected goals are lucky.
So are deflected shots that cannon off a defender's backside and clip the crossbar before dropping to safety. But they aren't included.
So are dozens and dozens of other interactions throughout a game.
And what is the startling result of this investigation?
Incorrect decisions benefit one team to the disadvantage of the other.
Comments
Cheers!
He was one hell of a player but I love him as a man too. A great role model, really knowledgeable and if he's not a thoroughly decent guy, he does a great impression of one!!
;ok
http://www.sportbible.com/football/news-reactions-leicester-fans-discover-that-away-shirt-is-available-as-plain-design-20180803
“People call it Britain. They call it Great Britain. They used to call it England – different parts.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/03/trump-queen-elizabeth-meeting-late
People call it Germany, they call it New York. They used to call it European Union. Different parts ;ok
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jul/17/trump-keeps-saying-his-father-was-born-in-germany-he-wasnt
87th minute, Boro get one back, and equalise in the 97th minute.
Nobody likes to see that........
;lol ;beer ;nolan ;wahoo
Gerrard playing the victim already:
https://bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45076686
Never liked him as a player, already don't like him as a manager.
#notboverd ;biggrin
Sarri's first competitive game in charge of Chelsea is at Huddersfield on Saturday
So, the Community Shield is not considered a competitive game.
This made me ;lol
The Xbox player secured a 4-0 aggregate victory over Belgium's Stefano 'StefanoPinna' Pinna to secure the top prize.
A study into 'luck' in the 2017/18 season. It's really interesting (I think), and actually shows that, based on the metric, we were 1 point better off than we should have been with neutral luck.
I saw that, and had grave doubts about its 'science'.
The BBC have got into reporting this kind of thing, without in any way bringing a critical mindset to it. (This isn't just a dig at the BBC; Ben Goldacre's book 'Bad Science' shows just how slack journalists have become in reporting 'scientific studies.') They happily published a bunch of nonsense from a 'super-computer' that claimed to determine what the final points would be for teams in the relegation zone, which was way out.
A research team collaborated with ex-Premier League referee Peter Walton, analysing footage from every game of the 2017-18 Premier League season and watching for:
Goals that should have been disallowed
Incorrectly disallowed goals
Incorrectly awarded penalties (that were scored)
Penalties that were not awarded but should have been
Incorrect red-card decisions
Red-card incidents that were missed
These can only subjective opinions. For me, the only way that would properly work would be to have the actual referee team that were at the game review the game. That way, at least there would be a consistency to the decisions.
Despite the claims that 'thousands of simulations were run' to determine how the game would have turned out taking these factors into account, there is simply no real way to know what might have happened.
Goals scored after injury time overran
This has nothing to do with luck whatsoever. Injury time as shown on the board is the minimum amount of time a referee is going to add, not a maximum.
Deflected goals
This is the biggest joke of the lot. Yes, deflected goals are lucky.
So are deflected shots that cannon off a defender's backside and clip the crossbar before dropping to safety. But they aren't included.
So are dozens and dozens of other interactions throughout a game.
And what is the startling result of this investigation?
Incorrect decisions benefit one team to the disadvantage of the other.
Think we probably knew that.