Smash Those Potters - Stoke (A) Match Thread 16.12.17 3pm

1111213141517»

Comments

  • I reckon VR will just be used to enhance the current instances where the referee takes advice from the linesmen and fourth official.
  • Luke, the obvious get out for the referee would be to award a penalty every time thus creating a break in play, knowing that VR would be used to determine the validity of the decision.
  • The problem with Madcap's picture is that Manu's arms seem to be in the exaggerated position that we normally call out as being a dive. Unfortunately ;wink
  • I think De Bruynes is a more obvious dive, I`m not sure he gets touched at all. If Lanzini`s appeal is turned down, it makes the ref look a right numpty. I`m also not sure where else his arms would be, if you fall they go either straight up or straight out. Unless you have them in your pockets of course.
  • Barney said:

    Madcaps picture appears to show the defenders hip going into Lanzini and I am sure that is what the referee saw. I dont think he dived; he appears to be trying to ride the tackle and the defender had to go through him to gt to the ball (which he is not anywhere near). successful appeal - I hope!

    Lanzini has left the ground and dived into the defender’s thigh, so has already dived before contact happens.
  • alderz said:

    Adam

    I think Outcast was asking what would happen if a team appealed for a penalty and the ref didn’t give it. The opposition team break, but at what point does the VR come into effect? Do you stop the counter to look at it? Do you wait for the ball to go out of play? What if they went and scored at the other end and then the VR brought it back?

    I think VR works in a lot of sports because of the natural breaks, but that isn’t really the case in football.

    That happened recently, I think it was in the Dutch league. I posted something at the time.
    Team a wanted a pen, team b broke and scored. The ref then ruled out the goal and awarded the pen instead.
  • edited December 2017
    That's the right call in my view, the game must play until a natural break but if the penalty gets awarded any goals scored after are ruled out just like an offside in which the striker scores but the flag is then seen by the referee, the ball went in the net but due to an earlier infringement the goal is disallowed. The linesman is in effect an earlier version of assistance to the referee that video will be soon.
  • No surprise IMO
    Lanzini failed appeal.
    2 match ban.
  • Does 1 of those games count tonight
  • Does 1 of those games count tonight

    Yes
  • edited December 2017
    That article is spot on. I'm all for punishing diving, but it has to be consistent.

    I'm not too worried about losing Lanzini for tonight - he was desperately ineffective against Arsenal last time out - but we really need him for the Newcastle game.
  • Maybe if we hadn't appealed it would have been a different outcome. Apparently if you appeal a different panel makes a decision to the one that would have decided.
  • The decision had been made and the appeal was against that decision.
  • Someone should make a website showing up the FA and referees for their inconsistency as until it is put in the spotlight they wont correct themselves. I guess it would be difficult due to ownership of the clips which would belong to Sky, BT or some other broadcaster.
  • I have to agree with the punishment. I think he dived and would be livid if it had been the other way around.
  • I agree Exeter, but it's the lack of consistency, even when being viewed retrospectively, that is most annoying.
  • So Gray has just dived to 'earn' Leicester a penalty.

    Watch this space then...
  • What then happens if Manchester City get knocked out?
  • edited December 2017
    The world stops spinning I think...
  • It will mean Leicester will be in the semis
  • Should De Bruyne be punished and suspended also (plus a few others but I can`t be bothered to find the videos). Blatant dive, no?

    https://streamable.com/dqm46

    If Lanzini`s suspension gets upheld and no other incidents are investigated from the weekend it shows what a mockery the whole procedure is. Absolute disgrace.

    I agree and said a similar thing yesterday. They punish the smaller Premier League clubs like West Ham for diving (let me get this clear I do think Lanzini dived) but they won't punish players in top teams. I don't think this is a coincidence in the slightest.
  • They didn't punish Palace for Zaha's dives
  • Personally, I feel that Lanzini's was the most blatant of any of the 'dives' to win anything in the last few weeks. There have been worse, but those were punished or ignored at the time.

    The fact you have to actually con the ref to be punished retrospectively is a serious flaw.
  • So Gray has just dived to 'earn' Leicester a penalty.

    Watch this space then...

    I`m watching, but I`m not sure Lineker has kicked up much of a stink yet.
  • On this occasion I’d have liked to hear the refs reason for giving the penalty being that he was in a good position to call it, and also what he as to say now given that our player as been banned for deceiving him
  • Not only that but 2 different panels thought it was a dive or maybe the 2nd was protecting the 1st
  • edited December 2017
    Just watched the Gray dive. IMO that is far worse than Lanzini's "dive".
    The difference is that Walker made some minor contact, although definitely not enough to cause Gray to fall, while running by the side of him.
    Lanzini however was aware that he was about to get clattered by Pieters who was making a sliding tackle. The fact that Pieters pulled out of the tackle before contact is irrelevant since Manu was not to know that.
    I'm not paranoid, but there does seem to be some conspiracy against us. ;wink

    But, hey, Leicester still lost and what joy to see Vardy and Mahrez both miss their penalties. ;lol
  • Investigated but no retrospective action to be taken.
This discussion has been closed.