With Twist on this one, I think he's a good player, but now we have a functioning RB, I think Slav will stick with four at the back. Thereby 2 CB. Reid, Fonte, Collins, Ogbonna, Oxford, Nordtveit, Kouyate, Burke, how many do we need??
For me I would be happy to sell Ogbonna without another replacement coming in and look to perhaps blood Oxford and/or Burke more. Or alternatively get them both good season long loans at championship level, still leaves us Reid, Fonte, Collins, Nordtveit and Kouyate!!
The price we would get for Collins is less than the value of him to our team in my opinion. Always reliable, always puts in 100%. Also, happy enough to generally be a bench player. Furthermore it seems he's very popular in the dressing room and a leader. And British. Loves the club. Great beard too. I've forgot my point. Keep Collins for next season, Oxford and Burke come in the season after. ;ok
Florin - great point on Collins. Probably the sort of player you'd get £1m/£2m for yet his ability and form for us is certainly worth more than that. Fonte cost us £8m, so Ginge should be valued at around £5m, even at his age.
Lukerz - I would say the discrepancy is even higher than that. Who could we get for even above 8m with Collins experience, ability, yet be happy and not mope in the dressing room sitting on the bench watching Reid and Fonte? Because I don't think we can find a CB better than those two at our level so any coming in will be on the bench. I seriously can't think of any candidate, and then you're looking at foreign players I've not heard of, and will they fit seamlessly into our training atmosphere? Not mentioning the fact they wouldn't have Collins' wealth of premiership experience and know-how. Genuinely skilled people who are happy on the bench such as Collins are vital for a club like ours. You need depth but don't play the amount of games to rotate enough to keep them happy like European qualifying teams, particularly at CB where a consistent pairing is so important.
Ok so given the news in the last hour, does anybody think we may see more than just the (expected) arrival of Hogan?? I'd certainly expect Calleri to be on his way. There's still two days to go...
Does Defoe make any sense? He's better than Hogan, but he's 33, even if he comes and gets 10 goals we aren't gonna finish higher than 7th/8th and are out of both cups
So it's going to be £10+ mil for a player who this season probably isn't going to make a huge difference, and he'll be a year older come next year
Surely Hogan long term makes more sense right now
Either way I'd take both of them but given our current position think I'd personally take a risk on Hogan then defoe
If we had 10 points less than we do then Defoe would be the call, although not safe by any means we are not still where we were 6 weeks ago and so Hogan should be the call. Not sure about him due to his injuries but Defoe is simply an emergency signing at his age and I don't think we have an emergency now.
Hypothetically if Hogan and, say joe hart were both available for 15m right now but our finances meant we could only sign one, which would people go for??...
For me we're not desperate for a new keeper (although id like to see us go for Joe Hart in the summer). But if Carroll gets injured (likely) we have Fletcher and Calleri as back up.
IH the real questions are: - how many strikers are we likely to play? - how many does that mean we actually need? - are we happy with the one's we've got?
I am assuming the answer to the third question in 'no'. so looking at current potential options, Hogan looks to be one considered likely to succeed, so punt was a poor choice of words by me initially.
I think money is likely to be far better spent on the hope that Hogan is going to succeed than the short term gain of Defoe and the alternative Barracks was inviting comment on of bringing in Joe Hart.
What i don't understand is that, as far as I can recall, no mention was made of Hogan up until 3-4 weeks ago and now he is the answer to our needs. I'd rather wait until the summer.
The reason I think we should go in for Hogan is that Carroll is a sprint away from being injured, Fletcher clearly isn't fancied by Slav, Calleri is probably on his way out, Antonio is better suited to the wing and Ayew hasn't exactly shone since he's been here.
Hogan offers something we haven't got which is a natural ability to score. None of our strikers are prolific and I think we need a goalscorer to supplement what we already have.
Comments
We can if we need to then look at viable realistic Striker and RB options in the summer.
More than enough to get to the end of the season.
Seems unlikely. ;hmm
Otherwise makes no sense.
I rate this player for a very bright future, wherever he ends up...
Only time will tell IH ;ok
For me I would be happy to sell Ogbonna without another replacement coming in and look to perhaps blood Oxford and/or Burke more. Or alternatively get them both good season long loans at championship level, still leaves us Reid, Fonte, Collins, Nordtveit and Kouyate!!
TL:DR I am Collins' agent.
Hogan is very much plan B.
Does Defoe make any sense?
He's better than Hogan, but he's 33, even if he comes and gets 10 goals we aren't gonna finish higher than 7th/8th and are out of both cups
So it's going to be £10+ mil for a player who this season probably isn't going to make a huge difference, and he'll be a year older come next year
Surely Hogan long term makes more sense right now
Either way I'd take both of them but given our current position think I'd personally take a risk on Hogan then defoe
He says with everything crossable crossed.
For me we're not desperate for a new keeper (although id like to see us go for Joe Hart in the summer).
But if Carroll gets injured (likely) we have Fletcher and Calleri as back up.
Hogan has promise, could be a Nicky Maynard or a Michael Antonio, but worth the punt I would have thought.
;yercoat
- how many strikers are we likely to play?
- how many does that mean we actually need?
- are we happy with the one's we've got?
I am assuming the answer to the third question in 'no'. so looking at current potential options, Hogan looks to be one considered likely to succeed, so punt was a poor choice of words by me initially.
I think money is likely to be far better spent on the hope that Hogan is going to succeed than the short term gain of Defoe and the alternative Barracks was inviting comment on of bringing in Joe Hart.
I'd rather wait until the summer.
That money will go further in the summer, plus in the summer we'll have a clearer idea of what we need in terms of the squad as whole.
Hogan offers something we haven't got which is a natural ability to score. None of our strikers are prolific and I think we need a goalscorer to supplement what we already have.