Pellegrini Confirmed as West Ham Manager (22.05.18) - already (September) there are doubters

13468912

Comments

  • Eduardo Macia has signed for West Ham as the Club’s new Director of Football. A position that David Sullivan promised that the club would adopt. Macia preciously worked as a scout at both Valencia and Liverpool and as head of recruitment at Leicester. #WHUFC
  • That's from Ex, I think.. There's nothing official so far.
  • Macia preciously worked as a scout at both Valencia and Liverpool and as head of recruitment at Leicester. #WHUFC

    I know that was supposed to say 'previously', but I prefer it how it is.

    Makes him sound like a right drama queen ;biggrin
  • What have you got in the transfer kitty, my precious?

    01
  • Moyes left a couple of weeks ago.
  • What have you got in the transfer kitty, my precious?

    01

    goldsullivan

    Gandolf and Bilbo discuss the Desolation of the Boleyn
  • ;weep ;weep

  • IMG_20180527_180748

    Too far? ;hmm
  • edited May 2018
    No.

    I think that’s what she looks like on the inside.
  • Why do we need to see photos of that vile women on this site

  • IMG_20180527_180748

    Too far? ;hmm

    ;hmm
  • edited May 2018
    Amazing what a bit of make up can do....

    Never realised we had a Ork running the club...
  • That will probably do re: Brady.

    It's not adding anything to the discussion.
  • Apart from entertainment value
  • That will probably do re: Brady.

    It's not adding anything to the discussion.

    Your right, only in one of films , a bit part actor
  • Image

    Feels like it is moving from humour to just nasty.
  • Has anyone posted this?
    https://1.ftb.al/eUV0wnafgN
    Tl;dr Pellegrini agreed in November 2017 he would take over at West Ham, and has been discussing transfer budgets and targets since then.
    That would be a case of Gollivan acting like fans want them to.

    If it's true, I applaud them but why then go through the theatrics:
    - Interviewing other managers.
    - Gold saying he wants Moyes to stay.

    Just thank Moyes for getting the job done and announce Pellegrini. Unless we were talking to Pellegrini without the required permissions there was no reason for the antics.
  • Image

    Feels like it is moving from humour to just nasty.

    ;ok
  • Yes, I'm not sure what the 'smokescreen' was meant to be screening. It doesn't really fit with the remainder of the theory.

    I can, though, see that discussions with Pellegrini a while back might have led to a tentative agreement 'in principle' that if West Ham avoided relegation (and various other 'ifs') talks would be held again in the summer.

    Exploring other possible options (eg Moyes, Fonseca, Rafa) in case things didn't work out with Pellegrini seems to me to be sensible forward planning.

    I also don't really buy the line that Moyes wasn't given funds in January as part of the 'secret' strategy. Surely Pellegrini taking the job was contingent on us avoiding relegation.
  • You should always have some sort back up plan
  • Hope for the best, plan for the worst ;ok
  • So Moyes was on to a loser no matter what happened, if he kept us Pellegrini takes over, if we were relegated he'd have been given the push.

    I actually feel sorry for him now
  • ASLEF

    Always assuming this report is true...
  • Why was Moyes on a loser? he agreed a 6 month contract with no further commitment on either side; Did his job, got paid handsomely and the contract ended. He was then in competition with whoever else is available. That's life working on a contractual basis.
  • ASLEF

    Always assuming this report is true...

    And always assuming that our staying up was the only qualification for Pellegrini coming.
  • Sadly it sounds all too believable...….
  • I think what also needs to be remembered is that Moyes was probably close the last chance saloon in terms of managing at the highest level, so the Dave’s took a massive risk in taking him on and arguably had more to lose than Moyes had it not worked
  • He was well paid for his 6 month contract and has, imo, improved his reputation somewhat.
  • But who sanctioned hugill then ?
  • edited May 2018
    Don't see the issue with signing Hugill.

    Sakho was determined to do the off, and we needed cover.

    We spent what we got for Sakho, and if/when we sell Hugill we've turned a profit.

    Striker is always the most difficult position to fill, and how many proven strikers were going to be tempted by 'we'd like you as 4th choice backup' in a team at the wrong end of the table?
This discussion has been closed.