Pellegrini Confirmed as West Ham Manager (22.05.18) - already (September) there are doubters
This discussion was created from comments split from: The new manager hunt (was the Moyes thread) only 3 days to wait....
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
https://whufc.com/news/articles/2018/may/22-may/manuel-pellegrini-confirmed-west-ham-united-manager
Welcome Boss ;clap
Really excited (tad nervous) about this
Hes a winner and its important he brings that mentality here...would love a good cup run
Biggest question for me is how we do with a back 4 which is his preffered line up
Lets hope the board back him and get the players he wants
Highest West Ham paid manager, good luck.
Of course most of us first became aware of Manuel Pellegrini when he became Manchester City boss.
He enjoyed the fifth highest win percentage in Premier League history during his three years in charge at the Etihad stadium, and signed Kevin De Bruyne, Raheem Sterling and Nicolas Otamendi in 2015
He also led City to Premier League glory in 2013/14, becoming the first coach from outside of Europe to win the title, and also lifted the League Cup in the same season.
City finished that campaign having scored 151 goals in all competitions – still an English record.
Not bad eh!?
And damn sully is looking old
Thought David Moyes did a good job with what he was given and the awful atmosphere surrounding the club.
# optimistic
However I'm happy with this appointment, as already said, let's hope he gets the backing now..
But a interesting choice and I look forward to see how it unfolds...
I'm sure he will bring in new players, but find the argument that without a big change in the squad he will do no better than recent managers concerning.
If he isn't capable of getting our current squad better organised, and playing well more consistently, then I don't see why he got the job.
Surely the idea is that he is a better coach than the likes of Moyes or Slav, not simply better provided he gets a fat wedge of money to buy better players?
I'd like to hope that even without additions, Pellegrini was good enough to get us to 10th+.
He needs properly backing though. Don’t want to see him being landed with Yaya and Nasri
Reckon Lanzini is more likely to hang around under Pellegrini, too
So if every other squad the in PL expanded and brought in new players, you think with Zero additions (with Mario and Harts Loans ended) you think he could coach us to the top 10.
I think there is a reason why certain managers ask for transfer budgets and its not necessarily because their coaching skills are poor...
As I said, I'm sure he will get to sign players, but I won't accept not signing big players as an excuse. He needs to be able to do better with our current lot, and allowing signings (or lack of them) as an excuse for not being able to do so is lowering the bar, imo.
But it is risky in the sense that his recent career experience is with Real Madrid & Man City, two vastly superior teams with lots of financial clout, before he (semi) retired to China. His records with Villarreal & Malaga give me hope, but like the classic "Sam & has Bolton days" or "Moyes & his glory days at Goodison", those stints were a while ago now, and he was a lot younger, still making a name for himself.
My other concern is that his focus on attacking football may get the salivary glands going, but given how bad we've defended for a few years now (even Moyes couldn't stem some of this, & he's deemed a defensive coach), is it the right appointment for the personnel we have? The PL is no longer a 4-4-2/4-2-2-2 league unless you are one of the top sides, & even they all play a variation on 4-3-3.
I'm excited in a curious kind of way, but Rafa would've been the safer appointment. You'd know with him, we'd be almost guaranteed to finish top 10. Is Pellegrini motivated to return to the glory days of Malaga, building a side relatively quickly & successfully? Will we be a side that ships goals but always looks to score one more than the opposition? Is he firm enough (reports of relaxed training regimes at Man City & Madrid)?
At 64, although not old, he's clearly not being appointed in the hope he's here for a decade.
A brave appointment. His CV certainly speaks for itself. Let's see what he can do.
coyi