The Chelsea shirt reminds me how nice it would be if clubs went without shirt sponsors, a very nice shirt also from whoever designed theirs. I quite like ours also as I always prefer when we stick to the traditional. The bubbles I can take or leave.
I can understand Paqueta taking 10, but not sure why the others are moving. 17 was free last season so Cornet could have had it then. Unless they're opening up numbers for new signings.
Just seen a clip of us walking out at Borehamwood from a Twitter account (linked over on KUMB). Oh my, the socks just look dreadful and the whole combo with the shorts really isn't great, who on earth approved it?
Just seen a clip of us walking out at Borehamwood from a Twitter account (linked over on KUMB). Oh my, the socks just look dreadful and the whole combo with the shorts really isn't great, who on earth approved it?
Having watched the highlights, my first impression was spot on; the whole combo doesn't work, it's just not a West Ham strip imo.
Have we gone with claret shorts to align with the women's team?
It had crossed my mind, but, tbh, the men's team is much bigger and we should wear what's appropriate for West Ham. I've no issues at all with the women's team wearing claret shorts, as I mentioned on a thread a while back, it's something that could and should have been addressed ages ago.
However, West Ham's colours typically include white shorts; I know we've had non-white shorts in the past, but if we're using this to align with the women's team then are we never going to have white shorts again? If this season's kit is anything to go by, that's a horrible thought going forwards. I suppose it doesn't help that I don't think the shirt is great (the cut of the blue arms looks wrong) and the socks, well, I thought we were trying to get away from being a circus.
I've tried to write this many times without it coming across as misogynistic, but realise I'm failing. Our kit can, evidently, be worn with claret shorts, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't look better with white shorts, and that's our history too. The long and the short of it is that primarily I have supported West Ham as a men's team, and I don't feel we should compromise our colours to align with our women's team which should feel free to use claret shorts if they rightly prefer to.
I think all teams -Women, Men, U16's, etc. should use the same strips. Every year for the past I-don't-know-how-many seasons, different versions of the colours have been used. Claret shorts, white shorts, blue shorts. We've seen it all! Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter. The club will sell 90% of stock over the course of the year, and next year, there'll be a new strip that will split opinions. If you remember BBC Newsround being hosted by John Craven, then you'll remember a time when football clubs didn't change their strip every year, and it wasn't an event used to produce marketing content. The steady stream of "leaks" of new home, away and third strips is quite tiring.
If, as seems to be have been suggested here and elsewhere, the men's and women's teams will wear the same kit, then I can't see the men's team having white shorts again, despite tradition.
That said, this season's away kit is supposedly all white, so I assume the women's team will wear the claret shorts with theirs? And if so, why couldn't the men wear white with theirs?
And I'm pro the stripy socks. But then my I loved the centenary kit. Rieper and Bilic at the back. Michael Hughes on the wing. Florin Raducioiu in Harvey Nichols.
Yes. I also thought a couple of other clubs (not PL) are doing that. I had a quick google and couldn't find anything else - I'll try again but I did spot these astounding facts
Spurs new shirt is retailing at £115.
As long ago as that 1990s, Labour's Football Task Force tried to get clubs to agree that a kit would last 2 years. (Fail!)
Forest Green Rovers experimented with more sustainable materials such as bamboo.
Brentford still release a new 3rd kit every year. (Why?)
Comments
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/65877733
It's always possible to get ours without the sponsors though and we often play in Europe without it.
https://www.whufc.com/news/four-hammers-switch-squad-numbers-202324-season
I can understand Paqueta taking 10, but not sure why the others are moving. 17 was free last season so Cornet could have had it then. Unless they're opening up numbers for new signings.
Lingard wore 14 for most of his career...
However, West Ham's colours typically include white shorts; I know we've had non-white shorts in the past, but if we're using this to align with the women's team then are we never going to have white shorts again? If this season's kit is anything to go by, that's a horrible thought going forwards. I suppose it doesn't help that I don't think the shirt is great (the cut of the blue arms looks wrong) and the socks, well, I thought we were trying to get away from being a circus.
I've tried to write this many times without it coming across as misogynistic, but realise I'm failing. Our kit can, evidently, be worn with claret shorts, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't look better with white shorts, and that's our history too. The long and the short of it is that primarily I have supported West Ham as a men's team, and I don't feel we should compromise our colours to align with our women's team which should feel free to use claret shorts if they rightly prefer to.
Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter. The club will sell 90% of stock over the course of the year, and next year, there'll be a new strip that will split opinions. If you remember BBC Newsround being hosted by John Craven, then you'll remember a time when football clubs didn't change their strip every year, and it wasn't an event used to produce marketing content. The steady stream of "leaks" of new home, away and third strips is quite tiring.
The bubbles are rubbish, though.
That said, this season's away kit is supposedly all white, so I assume the women's team will wear the claret shorts with theirs? And if so, why couldn't the men wear white with theirs?
I had a quick google and couldn't find anything else - I'll try again but I did spot these astounding facts
Spurs new shirt is retailing at £115.
As long ago as that 1990s, Labour's Football Task Force tried to get clubs to agree that a kit would last 2 years. (Fail!)
Forest Green Rovers experimented with more sustainable materials such as bamboo.
Brentford still release a new 3rd kit every year. (Why?)