Slate the club as I always do? I am dreadfully unhappy about what has happened to this club over a number of years now.
What positives are there about this club at all?
Name one positive thing?
The playing squad.
I'm assuming people are unhappy, as they think vwe should be doing a lot better with the players available. That implies we have a more than decent squad. If not, why sack Pelle since he would have been doing as well as expected.?
Fornals getting off the mark is a positive I guess. Oh and I've heard Rice played well. That's all I've got. I actually have no idea if our squad is decent or not. I'm hoping it was the manager and not the players.
So Arthur is totally at fault for the first and Diop for the second. I know, let's blame Sanchez.
"listen to Sherwood" - now I know you are having a laugh.
Why not listen to Sherwood, I said he might not be everone's cup of tea & a know it all, but who is the one who has won a PL title as a captain, you or him He has also not been alone stating the obvious for weeks IH, poor leadership/no identity, no clue TBH.
I don't blame Sanchez, I blame the fool who saw fit to sign him in the 1st place.
IMO I believe any top ex footballer/manager has more knowledge about the game than myself, & that includes the likes of Sherwood, Owen, Merson, Scholes, Neville, Hutchinson, Curbishley, Hoddle or whoever else may be in the studio or doing co comms when I'm watching, I might not always agree with everything that they say, but when most are saying/were saying the same thing for a few weeks it sort of makes what they are saying normally right/true IMO.
However, I often hear pundits making woefully uninformed comments, which betray a lack of basic knowledge about our club, and in terms of analysis, very often it is just onions.
However, I often hear pundits making woefully uninformed comments, which betray a lack of basic knowledge about our club, and in terms of analysis, very often it is just onions.
I might not always agree with everything that they say, but when most are saying/were saying the same thing for a few weeks it sort of makes what they are saying normally right/true IMO.
Herb: "So Arthur is totally at fault for the first"
I think that's a bit harsh, if there had been some better communication from his teammates he would (most likely) have let it go for a goal kick instead of heading it.
Herb: "So Arthur is totally at fault for the first"
I think that's a bit harsh, if there had been some better communication from his teammates he would (most likely) have let it go for a goal kick instead of heading it.
What about the fact that there were 2 players unmarked at the then back post when the ball was knocked back across? Shocking defending, similar to the first against Palace.
Comments
"listen to Sherwood" - now I know you are having a laugh.
So Pelle has gone, which is probably the right call, but what now?
The playing squad.
I'm assuming people are unhappy, as they think vwe should be doing a lot better with the players available. That implies we have a more than decent squad. If not, why sack Pelle since he would have been doing as well as expected.?
I don't blame Sanchez, I blame the fool who saw fit to sign him in the 1st place.
I really rate Merson, don't you?
I think that is clearly true for all of us.
However, I often hear pundits making woefully uninformed comments, which betray a lack of basic knowledge about our club, and in terms of analysis, very often it is just onions.
"So Arthur is totally at fault for the first"
I think that's a bit harsh, if there had been some better communication from his teammates he would (most likely) have let it go for a goal kick instead of heading it.