Someone has started an online petition to give Gareth Southgate a knighthood. While I think he's done far better than anyone expected him to compared to the other football players and managers who've received knighthoods I don't think Southgate has done enough.
1965 Stanley Matthews 1967 Alf Ramsey 1968 Matt Busby 1978 Walter Winterbottom 1994 Bobby Charlton 1998 Tom Finney 1998 Geoff Hurst 1999 Alex Ferguson 2002 Bobby Robson 2004 Trevor Brooking 2018 Kenny Dalglish
Bobby Robson got a CBE after getting England to the 1990 WC semi final, that would do for Southgate but not a knighthood.
Did you forget the we had a good tournament bit lol and to reiterate my opinion I thought we played better football than for a while and exceeded expectations but not knighthood material yet
For me England have gone from being a Lower Tier-2 team to, a Top Tier-2 team. Not a Tier 1 team yet. But have potential if they keep growing. Certainly though the tournament has proved they are now back with the other Top Tier 2 teams competing.
If, say Sam had come into this tournament and his main method of scoring goals/creating chances was corners/set pieces he would likely have received pelters because the natural instinct by many is to dislike him
However, if Southgate does it, he is seen to have given the team “an identity” and everyone warms to him
Last year England was 10th in the ELO rankings (a lot more accurate than the FIFA ones), as of last night we are 7th. Not as good as Germany, Spain or Brazil but better than Portugal, Argentina and Italy.
I still wouldn't say England are a top 10 team, but I certainly would say now, we have moved into that 10th - 15th bracket comfortably. I think before the tournament we were probably around the 20th - 25th mark.
Southgate hasn't only relied on set pieces, and the style of play is very different to what Sam would have almost certainly done. We wouldn't have seen the defenders play out confidently with Sam in charge, we wouldn't have had such a young side, we would have been far less likeable as a team, IMO.
Southgate has had an easy ride from the press, but I think he's only had that because he has earned it.
Southgate was pretty roundly mocked as an appointment. He’s turned that around and earned himself space from the press.
There’s a lot more there to praise than I think is being suggested, even if thete’s also a lot to address.
Lingard put in a lot of work and helped make England look dynamic, even if he faded in parts of games.
Sterling needs to work on his finishing but he absolutely terrorised Croatia early in the game and did similar against Sweden. He stretched the back line like no one else. Rashford doesn’t have the same impact because he seems to want to take players on himself rather than run off the ball.
Alli was not as good as we’ve seen for Tottenham but he still provided the only midfield creativity - winning the free kick and several smart through balls in the game that other attackers didn’t make the most of.
The whole defence were generally pretty good. Kane did his job for a while. England have some really good RWB options.
Sort out that midfield and they have a lot to offer
I don’t think you can say with certainty what Sam would/would not have done with a longer reign. He was the one who gave Reece Burke a run of games at West Ham. And when he had us flying at the start of one of his seasons with us the football was v pleasing on the eye. Who knows what he would have done with a full complement of player me to choose from at national level. What I am certain of though is that the media would have been circling around him like vultures waiting for any small opportunity to swoop
I wonder if the header from Perisic to Mandzukic to score their second would have been different if Trippier hadn't shoved Perisic in the back. The ball certainly would have taken a different trajectory and may well not have found Mandzukic. ;hmm
Wasn't his fault, Stones let Mandzukic run right by him. Momentary lapse of concentration on his part. Which was amusing considering he supposedly had cramp and needed lifting to hit feet from Alli and Co. lol
I don’t think you can say with certainty what Sam would/would not have done with a longer reign. He was the one who gave Reece Burke a run of games at West Ham. And when he had us flying at the start of one of his seasons with us the football was v pleasing on the eye. Who knows what he would have done with a full complement of player me to choose from at national level. What I am certain of though is that the media would have been circling around him like vultures waiting for any small opportunity to swoop
Games all about ifs if Carrol and Wilshire had been fit they’d have been on that plane
At the end of the day, I think the only real difference between the sides was Perisic. Yes, Croatia were stronger mentally and dominated but they weren’t doing all that much with it without him. He had the sharpness and drive to get ahead of walker for the goal, get that shot off that hit the post and nudge it to Mandzukic. Just a quality England didn’t have when they were on top
I thought it was very refreshing that there was no rolling around in the game, and virtually no diving either as far as I can remember. Suze, did you get a chance to correct the Argentinian girl on your course? ;biggrin
Comments
1965 Stanley Matthews
1967 Alf Ramsey
1968 Matt Busby
1978 Walter Winterbottom
1994 Bobby Charlton
1998 Tom Finney
1998 Geoff Hurst
1999 Alex Ferguson
2002 Bobby Robson
2004 Trevor Brooking
2018 Kenny Dalglish
Bobby Robson got a CBE after getting England to the 1990 WC semi final, that would do for Southgate but not a knighthood.
If honours are to be given, save them, say, for the divers who risked their lives to save the Thai boys
If, say Sam had come into this tournament and his main method of scoring goals/creating chances was corners/set pieces he would likely have received pelters because the natural instinct by many is to dislike him
However, if Southgate does it, he is seen to have given the team “an identity” and everyone warms to him
;hmm
Croatia jumped from 16th to 5th
http://www.eloratings.net/
Southgate hasn't only relied on set pieces, and the style of play is very different to what Sam would have almost certainly done. We wouldn't have seen the defenders play out confidently with Sam in charge, we wouldn't have had such a young side, we would have been far less likeable as a team, IMO.
Southgate has had an easy ride from the press, but I think he's only had that because he has earned it.
There’s a lot more there to praise than I think is being suggested, even if thete’s also a lot to address.
Lingard put in a lot of work and helped make England look dynamic, even if he faded in parts of games.
Sterling needs to work on his finishing but he absolutely terrorised Croatia early in the game and did similar against Sweden. He stretched the back line like no one else. Rashford doesn’t have the same impact because he seems to want to take players on himself rather than run off the ball.
Alli was not as good as we’ve seen for Tottenham but he still provided the only midfield creativity - winning the free kick and several smart through balls in the game that other attackers didn’t make the most of.
The whole defence were generally pretty good. Kane did his job for a while. England have some really good RWB options.
Sort out that midfield and they have a lot to offer
Although having said that there is far less histrionics in the women’s game and very little rolling around like they’ve been hit by sniper fire.
Suze, did you get a chance to correct the Argentinian girl on your course? ;biggrin