With Lukaku, they spent about four hours with him. I think it's mostly an interview but they get them to speak in the way they want it written. Their people then edit it up but the guy behind the Lukaku one said it's mostly about grammar.
BBC and others do similar things with the analysis you see from some footballers.
I like the concept. I imagine a lot of footballers aren't so confident in their own writing ability and would probably just procrastinate if they agreed to write it themselves.
I was wondering how much the style reflects the 'voice' (if you know what I mean). I thought the Lukaku one had a very London 'vernacular' which (to me) made it sound less authentic.
But I don't really know what Lukaku sounds like when he's speaking English (assuming they do the interviews in English) so I may be making incorrect assumptions. ;puzzled
I was wondering how much the style reflects the 'voice' (if you know what I mean). I thought the Lukaku one had a very London 'vernacular' which (to me) made it sound less authentic.
Carl Anka, the guy who edited, said he changed very little. I think it was colloquial but the style of speaking's unsurprising as you see how quickly footballers pick up the language of the local players around them. E.G. Bilic's "to be honests"
Just reading the Shaqiri one. Another great read.
You have all these things mentioned in passing in the supercritical, run-of-the-mill footballer interviews - that Sterling's father was killed, Lukaku's family came from Congo, Shaqiri's from Kosovo – but what all that meant to them is never explored.
A lot of people might not care or might even dislike this view but that kind of thing's made me feel a lot more connected to the England team this time. It's more of a mix that reflects what the PL has looked like for a long time and them playing well would really reflect something positive about our society and stick it to the tabloids and some of our politicians. France did that in '98 (even if it maybe didn't last).
Thanks for sharing those - quite interesting to read.
I have to admit the stories of the 3 I read were a little strange to me. All 3 (Sterling, Shaqiri, Lukaku) were almost written in the past tense - as if 'I've made it now I play as a professional and I'm rich'.
There wasn't much of thinking of the next level and kicking on to reach greatness or international accolades.
I think they get asked about that kind of stuff a lot in general interviews and they'll generally say the same things because they have the same goals in football. The point was to show the human side - what they went through to get where they are.
tbf, the focus in all 3 pieces was (it seems to me) about their history ... roots, childhood influences, what drove them, getting into football, how they got their first big break and so on.
Tunisia are giving Belgium a game, though. Lots of errors but they are creating their chances. I expect England will go through to the next round tomorrow, though.
How many more times is Phil Neville going to say Belgium are too quick for Tunisia?
#sevenandcounting
Ha ha Mrs Grey, I missed the first couple of minutes and then spent the rest of the first half muttering to myself that I wish Kevin Kilbane would shut up. Then he must have morphed into Phil Neville. ;lol
Comments
I skipped on to the Shaqiri one.
Are they ghost-written, do you know? Or based on interviews?
I like the concept, the 1st person thing. But the website doesn't tell you much about how they put their articles together.
BBC and others do similar things with the analysis you see from some footballers.
I like the concept. I imagine a lot of footballers aren't so confident in their own writing ability and would probably just procrastinate if they agreed to write it themselves.
I was wondering how much the style reflects the 'voice' (if you know what I mean). I thought the Lukaku one had a very London 'vernacular' which (to me) made it sound less authentic.
But I don't really know what Lukaku sounds like when he's speaking English (assuming they do the interviews in English) so I may be making incorrect assumptions. ;puzzled
Just reading the Shaqiri one. Another great read.
You have all these things mentioned in passing in the supercritical, run-of-the-mill footballer interviews - that Sterling's father was killed, Lukaku's family came from Congo, Shaqiri's from Kosovo – but what all that meant to them is never explored.
A lot of people might not care or might even dislike this view but that kind of thing's made me feel a lot more connected to the England team this time. It's more of a mix that reflects what the PL has looked like for a long time and them playing well would really reflect something positive about our society and stick it to the tabloids and some of our politicians. France did that in '98 (even if it maybe didn't last).
Yes, I like the insight it gives. They are actually quite ordinary people, who are currently doing extraordinary things.
(Referring to the interview subjects, not the England team.)
Just read that on Twitter, it was a great read.
I have to admit the stories of the 3 I read were a little strange to me. All 3 (Sterling, Shaqiri, Lukaku) were almost written in the past tense - as if 'I've made it now I play as a professional and I'm rich'.
There wasn't much of thinking of the next level and kicking on to reach greatness or international accolades.
Interesting to read nontheless.
I'm probably being a bit harsh TBF
You'll be needing this: ;yercoat
#sevenandcounting
;run
I think the choices are “no” or “fat”.