Slav is a bit predictable in that he would come in and have a great effect on the dressing room and get a decent start, then his tactics would be worked out pretty quickly and then he would lack the ability to keep the play and team evolving through a season.
EXETER, That may happen in the near future but I have no confidence that his replacement will play the type of football which will bring the fans the level of excitement they crave.
I think they will be looking for a Big Sam like contract for the season to avoid relegation and then look again in the summer.
If they do get rid, as I expect they will, it will be interesting as the two clear worst teams at present are Wolves and ourselves. Wolves are not panicking and have just given the manager a new contract despite losing their first five matches whilst we may look to replace very early.
I wonder what the board want. Two games (apparently) he’s been given; Everton away & Arsenal away. The chances are we take 0 points from either; leaving us with 3 from 7. That would almost be insurmountable. Do they then sack him?
I look through the league & nearly every side is better than us. Leeds, Burnley, Wolves, Brentford are maybe the only candidates to be on our level.
@Lukerz, Lets hazard a guess what the board really want. Probably for GP to ask for a meeting and inform them he has realised he isn't up for the job and is going to walk away with no compensation. Siting amongst many reasons that he can't pick a team without JWP & Soucek in the starting line up and he let our best CDM leave on loan, but then I wake up. Is it true that DS wanted only to offer a six month contract to see if GP was going to be a good appointment but KB wanted it to be on a longer contract?
Is it true that DS wanted only to offer a six month contract to see if GP was going to be a good appointment but KB wanted it to be on a longer contract?
Why would Luke know that?
For what it's worth, I read in a reputable source (*ie not a fan blog or forum) that they opened negotiations by offering a short contract initially but that he resisted. A compromise was reached.
@Lukerz, Lets hazard a guess what the board really want. Probably for GP to ask for a meeting and inform them he has realised he isn't up for the job and is going to walk away with no compensation.
GP doesn't walk away, citing failure to do a good job.
When Chelsea sacked him, he demanded a multi-million £ pay off plus a £200,000 per week (W-E-E-K) for 18 months. Which was, of course, less than he was entitled to under the full contract but ... you know ...
MrsG, Lukerz wondered what the board want so I gave a far fetched answer that what they would really want to happen. Hence the comment then I wake up. My later point was a general question not directed at Lukerz which you have now kindly answered.
Comments
Bilic has had five clubs since us and the longest he lasted was a season and a half at West Brom. Maybe not…
For what it”s worth (if anything) this just popped up on my facebook page.
https://www.instagram.com/lot14_theydon/p/DKUSylnMLYI/?hl=en
Doesn’t matter, the squad is not fit for purpose, it’s one of the worst in the league
Bilic for me.
Back to square 1, not going to solve anything.
I would be getting experience for Potts / Earthy / Fearon / Marshall get them ready for the championship push.
If they do get rid, as I expect they will, it will be interesting as the two clear worst teams at present are Wolves and ourselves. Wolves are not panicking and have just given the manager a new contract despite losing their first five matches whilst we may look to replace very early.
I look through the league & nearly every side is better than us. Leeds, Burnley, Wolves, Brentford are maybe the only candidates to be on our level.
For what it's worth, I read in a reputable source (*ie not a fan blog or forum) that they opened negotiations by offering a short contract initially but that he resisted. A compromise was reached.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/jan/08/west-ham-julen-lopetegui-sacking-graham-potter-contract-manager
"the former Chelsea and Brighton manager eventually succeeding in his demand for a lengthier agreement"
When Chelsea sacked him, he demanded a multi-million £ pay off plus a £200,000 per week (W-E-E-K) for 18 months. Which was, of course, less than he was entitled to under the full contract but ... you know ...
My later point was a general question not directed at Lukerz which you have now kindly answered.