Summer Transfer Speculation (its just two months away)

124»

Comments

  • alderzalderz
    Fortuneseeker said:

    MrsGrey said:

    Because Potter doesn't want to sell him?

    Just guessing here.

    So we plan to keep an unhappy player, that normally works out well 😉.

    Chalobah is better than Mavrapanos?
    Dewsbury-Hall would improve our midfield?
    Have to keep reminding myself not to take any notice of reports!


    In your opinion, of course. For me, Dewsbury-Hall is basically a left footed Ward-Prowse. He’s not what I would think we would need in centre midfield.

    And obviously nobody is saying not to pay attention to any reports. If a report links us with Dewsbury-Hall then it’s fair to discuss the merits of the player. It’s not as fair to question the managers decision making, though, because who knows if the report is accurate or not.
  • welovethehammerswelovethehammers
    I’d love Chalobah but the rest of the Chelsea players we’ve been linked to I’d happily miss out on. Nkunku is the one I’m indecisive on
  • LukerzLukerz
    Josh Brownhill being reported as close by C&H on a free.
  • EXETERHAMMEREXETERHAMMER
    He is 30 next year. So much for lowering the average age of the squad.
  • stevesteve
    I would be okay with Brownhill on a free .seems like he,s a leader .and would be good to have around .Also he can play a bit
  • buffybegoodbuffybegood
    edited 1:20PM
    In isolation Brownhill doesn't do anything (imo) to improve our midfield, if he simply joins Soucek, JWP, Alvarez, Rodriguez, Irving and, say, Potts. However, given I expect at least 3, and maybe even 4 of the first 5 to leave, then he's a cheap, experienced player to add some depth alongside one, or preferably 2 younger, faster, more dynamic players coming in.
Sign In or Register to comment.