The Mark Noble Thread
This discussion was created from comments split from: Bournemouth away - Tuesday 12th 19:45 (club record matched; 1-3 win).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Most technical passer.
Adrian
Tomkins - Reid - Ogbonna - Cresswell
Kouyate - Noble
Payet - Lanzini - Valencia
Sakho
Randolph, Collins, Jenkinson, Song, Obiang, Antonio, Carroll
;lol
If it comes to raw ability and technical ability, then out of Kouyate, Obiang, Song and Noble....if they were all on top of their game, he probably would lose his place
but, they never are, well Song isn't, Obiang is just breaking through and Kouyate has been injured, so he stays in the team for me.
And Noble got turned a lot, more than a lot against Bournemouth
I rate noble think he's a fine player but he doesn't look like he's come to life untill we are either ahead or we've just equalised
Not knocking him but fail to see what he can do that Obiang can't, and neither have kouyate ability.
I get he's the captain but look on the pitch he's not exaclty a screamer. Why do we turn it around at half time not during the match, it's because Slaven inspires them not noble
As in he's far superior to Song, Kouyate and Obiang when he has the ball at his feet.
Nobles played an extra 6 games acvording to that but has played over twice as many minutes
You are free to do your own comparison, with any metrics you like.
As to 'useless' - well that's your opinion.
These are the per 90 metrics
If you find these useless too, then I suggest you ignore them or go to Squawka and find some that suit you.
I didn't say anything about the players, or what I thought the statistics showed. I provided them as a courtesy to try to inform the conversation.
Statistics are simply facts in numerical form.
They need to be interpreted, but they are, nevertheless, facts, and are a tad more reliable ( or at least more informative and accurate) than 'well, I reckon', imo.
You said:
thought obiang was by far the better passe and more aggressive passe out of the 2
that is obviously your impression, but it isn't obviously borne out by the available statistics.
For me, I think he's the best passer we have in CM. He's good at the simple stuff, he's good at the sensible stuff but he's also our best at switching play. Some of his long passes to Payet against Bournemouth were fantastic. He is also capable of a cracking through ball, but doesn't do it as often as he perhaps should.
It's not just the passing though, it's being available for the pass. Very often he is our only option for the other players, which is why he tops the most passes stat every season, because he shows for it more than the others, he wants it more. Until I see someone else regularly want that responsibility, he's our best deep lying playmaker for me.
I don't think stats necessarily show how a player has played in a specific match either.
However, they can be useful when examining specific claims about a player's strengths or weaknesses.
For example, every pundit I've heard in recent weeks points out that Liverpool aren't using Benteke properly, that he is a beast in the air and that they need to get high balls in to the box. I mean, everyone knows that, right?
Except, he has scored 48 PL goals, of which only 14 (just under 30%) have been headers.
The vast majority of his goals have come inside the 18 yard box, so perhaps they should be working out how to get the ball to his feet in those situations?
Stats aren't the be all and end all of anything, but, imo, neither are they pointless.
I've seen Payet, Lanzini, Valencia, Zarate and Cresswell all take set-plays ahead of him this season.
;ok
Tbh, I don't think Nobes is a bad set-play taker. It was more the 'floaty' nature he was instructed to take them.
baracks - so you don't believe Nobes is out best passer in CM? ;hmm