Looked quite harsh to me, one of those where you're trying to block off space/protect yourself. Would be disappointed (though not surprised) if it was given against us in the Prem.
Was a pen. Walker made no attempt to play the ball but just focused on stopping the attacker. Was a foul imo. And thus a pen. The fact that the VAR ref didn't ask the referee to have another look at it supports that.
Was a pen. Walker made no attempt to play the ball but just focused on stopping the attacker. Was a foul imo. And thus a pen. The fact that the VAR ref didn't ask the referee to have another look at it supports that.
But their player was never getting the ball anyway, so harsh imo. Just because VAR didn't refer it to the ref means little given some of their decisions so not sure you can justifyably use that to back up your argument.
Ok a very soft penalty to concede, however I don’t believe there has been any side which has been more easy on the eye going forward in the whole tournament than England.
Buffy it doesn’t matter if the player would have got the ball or not. If it’s a foul it’s a pen.
The fact that he wasn't getting the ball makes it at worst obstruction imo, not a foul. Would still be gutted if it was given against us, don't believe that is given against a top 6 club.
Buffy, if a foul only counts where the opposition player would have got the ball (which we can tell by looking into our crystal ball) it would be okay to kick lumps out of players off the ball. Which clearly is not the case.
Comments
That’s a lot better from Belgium.
2 nil up now.
Having a medicinal ;redwine
COME ON ENGLAND ;wahoo
Did you know he has a monkeys head ;quaver
A lot to like.
Not their pen though or the fact we should have had one, or that we should have put more of those chances away.