West Ham UNITED vs City's Stars - Wed 1st Feb KO 19:45 London Stadium Fortress

12345679»

Comments

  • No. Or at least I don't.
  • Thorn

    There are a lot of games you can point to as negatives, but beating Palace 3-0 is not the same as 'hanging on', and if you honestly think Middlesbrough outplayed us I think maybe you got lost on the way to a Spurs forum ;wink
  • Antonio did really well last night in difficult circumstances, beat Sagna every time. I havent seen the replays, but was his offside goal the correct call? Real time it looked a close one.
  • Alders I never said we hung on against palace at home. It was the 1-0 away win where palace missed a penalty and umpteen chances.
  • And as usual I'm working (3:39pm until 11:13pm). Guess I'll record it and avoid the pub

    lets change the name to The New Boleyn Ground ( new Den )

    Why not ;hmm

    Because we'd have to pay LS185 a couple of dozen million for the privilege...
  • I know I should find a way to move on but were we really that pitiful last night or was it just that Manchester City were that good or did we make them look awesome because they haven't got similar results against other teams? ;weep
  • Has anyone else seen the rumour that cressers may be landed with a 4 game misconduct charge for aiming a punch at sterling??..

    The Sun reported it, but nobody esle as far as I could see.

    Then about an hour ago they reported that he has ESCAPED a ban.

    In fact, the video footage was not deemed by the FA to justify even charging him. So more accurately, he ESCAPED a charge. But is doesn't sound as exciting. ;doh
  • ;doh

    *rolls eyes
  • I think City just don't suit us at present as they press so quickly and and move the ball so quickly, they have players who we would be ecstatic about bringing in were even one of them like De Bruyen possible.

    I think the disappointment is because last season we and others showed that there was no longer a gulf between the top four and the rest, well this season it's back bigger than before and clear for all to see, it's not to say they wont have a bad result or two but essentially can make other teams look poor.....and they did last night.

    We need some quality and we didn't invest in quality this year but in Fonte and Snodgrass I think we have recognised our error, we will need find the money in the summer to improve our recruitment even further if we have ambition of progressing from a mid table team. For now what with the Dimi saga, the worst summer transfer window imaginable and the settling into the new stadium, I will settle for mid table, but hope the owners are able to match our ultimate ambition which speaking to fellow hammers seems to be a side that has something to play for come February and March, a cup run, a potential top 6 Europe place, just to be looking upwards in the table and something to play for.
  • I thought we were lucky to get nil last night.
  • Didnt Bilic say we were looking for a RB but we couldnt get one in (that he and the board) that would improve the team/was better than what we had?

    That leads me to believe that we will be trying in the summer to bring in another RB. Maybe I am naive, but that seems reasonable to me (bearing in mind Jan TF window availability and current TF price levels)

    Oh and in terms of the game, its only in recent weeks our results have improved (2 months with Payets negativity and lack of effort wouldn't have helped the team).Last season I got to a point where I wasn't worried who we were playing because we were strong, pacey and scored goals. That's in marked contrast to the past when I was always worried when we played a top 4 team (or one with the capacity to be a top 4 team). My mindset then was that we needed to have a good day and they needed to have an average to poor day for us to have a chance of winning.

    My mindset has reverted to us needing to have a good day at the office to have a chance. Last night we didnt and they did, pretty simple. Man City can rip any team apart on their day. There's no shame in it. However, obviously its disappointing when we are mistaken ridden and make it easier for them.
  • Man city can rip teams apart but generally it's only us they do.
    They have lost 3 of their last 5 away games and recently got thrashed by Everton.

    Let's face it they looked great because they played us.

    They may have expensive players but that is no excuse for the awful way we approach games against them and the schoolboy errors we make in loads of games.

    Other teams do not cave in on a regular basis like we do. I don't understand why it keeps happening as we have better players than lots of other teams and really should not regularly get smashed.
  • bbb

    Thats for the clutching at straw emoji, not the pitch reduction.
  • Just a silly thought - but for me, our pitch looks too big for us. I know that they train on it week in week out, but can the dimensions not be changed to that of the Boleyn to cut down space exactly for the detriment of the sides that have the players and systems to exploit a pitch like ours. we currently do not - we look lost on it.
    I am clutching at straws - can we have a clutching at straws emoji please. I feel it would get a lot of use....

    BBB, i think you make a good point.

    Problem is if it is the same size as the Boleyn pitch the front row would need binoculars, let alone those towards the back....
  • Twist. The far side would be closer. ;lol
  • Well the technical area is like 20 foot
  • I thought I read on this forum that the pitch is only marginally (1-1½metres) bigger
  • I think the pitch looks massive as the advertising boards are so far back its only marginally bigger than the Boleyn pitch
  • edited February 2017
    My mistake:
    This from the OS:
    At the Boleyn Ground, the pitch was 100.5 x 68m as ground staff could not make the standard length due to the confines of the Stadium.
    London Stadium: 105 x 68m.
  • edited February 2017
    We've been through this several times and it's not an excuse. This was on the official club site in response to people continually saying our pitch is too big.

    "The pitch at London Stadium is the standard size required by Premier League and UEFA Rules, 105 x 68m.

    At the Boleyn Ground, the pitch was 100.5 x 68m as ground staff could not make the standard length due to the confines of the stadium."

  • I personally think that the goal which randy defends is generally bigger than the one the opposition keeper defends and that is why we are letting in so many goals.
  • Keep an eye open at half time because they must swap them over because it's always our goal that's bigger.
  • edited February 2017
    I could understand it making a difference if it was 4½metres wider, but not if it's longer.
  • The BBC said whilst commentating on our match on Wednesday night that we are now 5 m longer and 4 m wider than the Boleyn and to them that was a major factor as to why we can't close teams down like we used to.
  • They're wrong then. I'm sure the club knows the pitch sizes.
  • Or just sign better players who can play on a bigger pitch
  • We wouldn't be able to narrow the pitch. There are standard measurements as designated by the PL and EUFA and that is 105M x 68M. Some pitches such as the Boleyn was shorter because of the ground constraints.
    Some clubs are having to increase their pitch size but you cannot now go below the standard.
    I went on the Chelsea stadium tour with my grandson 2 weeks ago and the tour guide told us that Chelsea are having to increase their pitch size to the standard. They're hoping to get if delayed until the new stadium is finished.
  • Glen Hoddle? ;hmm
  • Didn't Hoddle say our players were paying for their sins at previous clubs ;run
This discussion has been closed.