Oh no, the umpire takes ages before raising his finger to an lbw appeal, I fear umpire's call will be huge here, and it is, just a sliver of wicket being hit.
He's just going to have to try and block his way through
Surely they do everything to ensure he doesn't face a ball, having to run on the 6th ball of ever over regardless. India should have a fielder right by the stumps.
The six dropped catches cost us a lot of runs, over a hundred, and ultimately the match but their 10th wicket put on 49 including 5 sixes as we exerted no pressure so when we were down to 27 and then 18 to win we wouldn’t have needed them. I think England get a bit arrogant in feeling that they’ll chase down whatever they’re set regardless. In any case 2-2 was a fair reflection on the series.
From what I saw with ball tracking the ball barely shaved the stump and I doubt it would have dislodged the bail. Every other lbw appeal that was reviewed (at least those that I saw) showed the ball hitting at least enough to have done so. The umpire up until that decision had been very good with the 50/50 calls so it was a surprise that he gave Overton out. Anyway, all IMO, assuming of course I'm allowed an opinion.
Now that the farce of the 100 is over and done with, we can get back to some proper cricket; England take on South Africa in the first of the ODIs. South Africa have won the toss and put us in to bat.
Comments
In any case 2-2 was a fair reflection on the series.
Every other lbw appeal that was reviewed (at least those that I saw) showed the ball hitting at least enough to have done so.
The umpire up until that decision had been very good with the 50/50 calls so it was a surprise that he gave Overton out.
Anyway, all IMO, assuming of course I'm allowed an opinion.