According to some press reports Pelle wanted Adrian to stay so whose decision was it for him to go. If it was his for more game time fair play to him but why go to a club who initially signed him to be on the bench unless he had no other offers. If it was neither his or Pelle’s decision then it seems odd.
I think that he is a very good goalkeeper, for different reasons he couldn't find an arrangement to continue here but we wanted him here. He's not just a good keeper but for the squad also.
(being serious about Liverpool for a change). At Adrians age, most likely knowing he'd be behind Fab, I totally don't blame him for seeking out a club where he'd actually be first choice.
However, how many keepers in Adrians position (as in without a club) would turn down Liverpool (even if it was to be a bench player)? He'd have a chance of glory playing in cups and, as has already been said, they'd most likely play more games too. Allisons injury is just cherry on the top
It was my first sentence which was the crux in that Pelle didn’t want him to leave so it had to be his choice. Given that he probably wanted more game time even at Liverpool he woul£ probably only have expected about 6-8 games max. He would not normally have played European games.
Comments
Or Manchester City. :whistle:
Maybe judged them too harshly in the Man U game.
Glad for him.
We watched until half time in extra time.
If it was neither his or Pelle’s decision then it seems odd.
https://www.football.london/west-ham-united-fc/fixtures-results/every-word-manuel-pellegrini-just-16760307
On Adrian:
However, how many keepers in Adrians position (as in without a club) would turn down Liverpool (even if it was to be a bench player)? He'd have a chance of glory playing in cups and, as has already been said, they'd most likely play more games too. Allisons injury is just cherry on the top
Simply unbelievable